Cornell vs Yale 03/08

[BearLover]

Re: Yale being awful this* year.

I'm not sure if it was Tim or Grady that said this, but iirc they said that 3 of the top 6 points players were out with injuries last night.

According to the roster on CHN, all six of Yale's highest scorers played Saturday.

[abmarks]

Re: Yale being awful this* year.

I'm not sure if it was Tim or Grady that said this, but iirc they said that 3 of the top 6 points players were out with injuries last night.

According to the roster on CHN, all six of Yale's highest scorers played Saturday.

Correct.  Realized this morning that the 3 of 6 mention was from the Lax game vs. Penn State earlier in the day.

[VIEWfromK]

Since Yale had already lost their timeout when they lost the second challenge, if the third review was not a challenge but rather something the refs were reviewing on their own, then had the review not resulted in the major penalty, Yale would not have been hit with a minor penalty. If, in fact, the third review was also a challenge, then Yale was risking a minor penalty.

I really wish that a team could no longer challenge something after they lose one or else the minor penalty potential should exist from the outset instead of just losing your timeout.  Those stakes aren't high enough to make you have to pick your spots.  I don't think Yale would have changed their challenges the other night with their season on the line.  The replay was pretty clear on the first goal and I saw the major with my own eyes as it happened.  I just think that the challenge consequences should be higher.

[andyw2100]

Since Yale had already lost their timeout when they lost the second challenge, if the third review was not a challenge but rather something the refs were reviewing on their own, then had the review not resulted in the major penalty, Yale would not have been hit with a minor penalty. If, in fact, the third review was also a challenge, then Yale was risking a minor penalty.

I really wish that a team could no longer challenge something after they lose one or else the minor penalty potential should exist from the outset instead of just losing your timeout.  Those stakes aren't high enough to make you have to pick your spots.  I don't think Yale would have changed their challenges the other night with their season on the line.  The replay was pretty clear on the first goal and I saw the major with my own eyes as it happened.  I just think that the challenge consequences should be higher.

I also was worried about the major as it happened. Immediately checked both refs, and was relieved. Was also relieved when it looked like play was about to start again without Yale challenging. The bench waited a while before getting a ref over, and I really thought they weren't going to challenge.

[VIEWfromK]

Since Yale had already lost their timeout when they lost the second challenge, if the third review was not a challenge but rather something the refs were reviewing on their own, then had the review not resulted in the major penalty, Yale would not have been hit with a minor penalty. If, in fact, the third review was also a challenge, then Yale was risking a minor penalty.

I really wish that a team could no longer challenge something after they lose one or else the minor penalty potential should exist from the outset instead of just losing your timeout.  Those stakes aren't high enough to make you have to pick your spots.  I don't think Yale would have changed their challenges the other night with their season on the line.  The replay was pretty clear on the first goal and I saw the major with my own eyes as it happened.  I just think that the challenge consequences should be higher.

I also was worried about the major as it happened. Immediately checked both refs, and was relieved. Was also relieved when it looked like play was about to start again without Yale challenging. The bench waited a while before getting a ref over, and I really thought they weren't going to challenge.

Or couldn't challenge!  I thought they had conveniently convinced the refs to check but sounds like they could legally challenge if they were willing to risk a minor.  I definitely don't know the rules.

[upprdeck]

is he out for the first Colgate now?

[VIEWfromK]

is he out for the first Colgate now?

He didn't get a DQ

[upprdeck]

So why did he have to leave the ice then and have Desantis sit in the box?

[Give My Regards]

So why did he have to leave the ice then and have Desantis sit in the box?

Game misconduct.  He was done for that game but it doesn't carry over.

[RichH]

So why did he have to leave the ice then and have Desantis sit in the box?

Game misconduct.  He was done for that game but it doesn't carry over.

Right.

Game Misconduct = out for rest of that game
Game Disqualification = out for rest of game + next game

My question: do those both count as +10 minutes to that player's PIM stat?

[upprdeck]

ok. I wondered. I didn't hear it when it was announced

But then I didn't see/hear the 50/50 winner either.

[VIEWfromK]

So why did he have to leave the ice then and have Desantis sit in the box?

Game misconduct.  He was done for that game but it doesn't carry over.

Right.

Game Misconduct = out for rest of that game
Game Disqualification = out for rest of game + next game

My question: do those both count as +10 minutes to that player's PIM stat?

15 PIM for Mack
Nothing for time served for Desantis

[jtwcornell91]

ok. I wondered. I didn't hear it when it was announced

I heard it, but then I was listening closely for it once I saw Desantis go into the box.

[Jeff Hopkins '82]

Some light racism in this thread

Where?  "Safe travels" is a common wish, no?

I had no idea what he was talking about either.