Cornell Women Hockey

Started by Cop at Lynah, January 17, 2020, 06:01:14 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Beeeej

Beeeej, Esq.

"Cornell isn't an organization.  It's a loose affiliation of independent fiefdoms united by a common hockey team."
   - Steve Worona

Jim Hyla

"Cornell Fans Made the Timbers Tremble", Boston Globe, March/1970
Cornell lawyers stopped the candy throwing. Jan/2005

Jim Hyla

Quote from: BeeeejUgh.

NCAA selection show tonight at 9pm EDT, live-streamed:

https://www.ncaa.com/sports/icehockey-women/nc?utm_campaign=inline-article

Suspect:

Mercyhurst at #1 Cornell
Clarkson at #2 Wisconsin
Princeton at #3 Northeastern
Ohio State at #4 Minnesota

We'll see at 9.

edit: I used USCHO PWR.
"Cornell Fans Made the Timbers Tremble", Boston Globe, March/1970
Cornell lawyers stopped the candy throwing. Jan/2005

Jeff Hopkins '82

Quote from: Jim Hyla
Quote from: BeeeejUgh.

NCAA selection show tonight at 9pm EDT, live-streamed:

https://www.ncaa.com/sports/icehockey-women/nc?utm_campaign=inline-article

Suspect:

Mercyhurst at #1 Cornell
Clarkson at #2 Wisconsin
Princeton at #3 Northeastern
Ohio State at #4 Minnesota

We'll see at 9.

edit: I used USCHO PWR.

Those guesses seem right to me.

djk26

You called it exactly, Jim.  LGR.
David Klesh ILR '02

blackwidow

Quote from: Jeff Hopkins '82
Quote from: Jim Hyla
Quote from: BeeeejUgh.

NCAA selection show tonight at 9pm EDT, live-streamed:

https://www.ncaa.com/sports/icehockey-women/nc?utm_campaign=inline-article

Suspect:

Mercyhurst at #1 Cornell
Clarkson at #2 Wisconsin
Princeton at #3 Northeastern
Ohio State at #4 Minnesota

We'll see at 9.

edit: I used USCHO PWR.

Those guesses seem right to me.

Does today's OT loss count as a loss or a tie?

Jeff Hopkins '82

Quote from: blackwidow
Quote from: Jeff Hopkins '82
Quote from: Jim Hyla
Quote from: BeeeejUgh.

NCAA selection show tonight at 9pm EDT, live-streamed:

https://www.ncaa.com/sports/icehockey-women/nc?utm_campaign=inline-article

Suspect:

Mercyhurst at #1 Cornell
Clarkson at #2 Wisconsin
Princeton at #3 Northeastern
Ohio State at #4 Minnesota

We'll see at 9.

edit: I used USCHO PWR.

Those guesses seem right to me.

Does today's OT loss count as a loss or a tie?

Loss.  

5 on 5 OT losses are a loss.  3 on 3 or shoot out results are ties.

Jim Hyla

Quote from: blackwidow
Quote from: Jeff Hopkins '82
Quote from: Jim Hyla
Quote from: BeeeejUgh.

NCAA selection show tonight at 9pm EDT, live-streamed:

https://www.ncaa.com/sports/icehockey-women/nc?utm_campaign=inline-article

Suspect:

Mercyhurst at #1 Cornell
Clarkson at #2 Wisconsin
Princeton at #3 Northeastern
Ohio State at #4 Minnesota

We'll see at 9.

edit: I used USCHO PWR.

Those guesses seem right to me.

Does today's OT loss count as a loss or a tie?

Loss, if the OT tie rule was in effect, they would have played an initial 5 minute OT immediately, like all regular season games, then a 20 minute OT. But no ties in postseason.
"Cornell Fans Made the Timbers Tremble", Boston Globe, March/1970
Cornell lawyers stopped the candy throwing. Jan/2005

Jim Hyla

Our game is at 2 Saturday 3/14 @ Lynah.

Edit: let's hope that we can watch it there.
"Cornell Fans Made the Timbers Tremble", Boston Globe, March/1970
Cornell lawyers stopped the candy throwing. Jan/2005

blackwidow

Thank you all for quick responses.
I drove from pton for the game.  Im feeling pain not just for the loss but the pain the athletes must be feeling. In a way, I don't like Cornell being ranked no 1 or undefeated going into tournaments.

Swampy

Quote from: blackwidowThank you all for quick responses.
I drove from pton for the game.  Im feeling pain not just for the loss but the pain the athletes must be feeling. In a way, I don't like Cornell being ranked no 1 or undefeated going into tournaments.

After the embarrassing loss to Quinnipiac, Coach Schafer seems to have righted the ship of the men's hockey team. Heading into the nationals, I'm hoping Coach Derraugh and the women's team can use the pain of Saturday's loss to bring the team back to the level it's capable of playing.

Swampy

I also have some other questions. This Sun article gives the brackets. Note that three Big Ten teams and three ECAC teams are in the eight-team field.

For the semifinals and Finals the bracket diagram also gives the location of and names the TV network broadcasting the semifinal and final games. The games are all at BU's Agganis Arena and, in all three cases, the broadcaster is the Big Ten Network.

Now maybe I can understand this for top bracket, which includes an OSU v Minnesota match up, so its semifinal will include (at least and at most) one B1G team. But the bottom bracket includes only one B1G team, Wisconsin, and two ECAC teams, Clarkson and Princeton, who could possibly meet in the semifinal and then advance to the championship game, where one of them might play Cornell.

So how does the Big Ten Network get exclusive rights to televise these games? Boston is not exactly Big-Ten territory. And would a Big Ten audience tune in to watch an all-ECAC semifinal and final?

And what about the fans of the other teams? ECAC fans have subscribed to ESPN+, but it looks as if HEA did not televise its women's championship, nor did the CHA televise its. Nonetheless, it's highly unlikely that fans from any of these leagues subscribe to the Big Ten Network. Fox Sports does carry BTN shows, but what if an ECAC cord-cutter only shelled out for ESPN+ and has no cable sports package that allows access to Fox Sports?

In just seems odd that a conference-based network from a different region would have the broadcasting rights while a national, conference-independent network like ESPN+ -- or even a regional, conference-independent network like NESN -- does not.

Can any of you explain this?

scoop85

Quote from: SwampyI also have some other questions. This Sun article gives the brackets. Note that three Big Ten teams and three ECAC teams are in the eight-team field.

For the semifinals and Finals the bracket diagram also gives the location of and names the TV network broadcasting the semifinal and final games. The games are all at BU's Agganis Arena and, in all three cases, the broadcaster is the Big Ten Network.

Now maybe I can understand this for top bracket, which includes an OSU v Minnesota match up, so its semifinal will include (at least and at most) one B1G team. But the bottom bracket includes only one B1G team, Wisconsin, and two ECAC teams, Clarkson and Princeton, who could possibly meet in the semifinal and then advance to the championship game, where one of them might play Cornell.

So how does the Big Ten Network get exclusive rights to televise these games? Boston is not exactly Big-Ten territory. And would a Big Ten audience tune in to watch an all-ECAC semifinal and final?

And what about the fans of the other teams? ECAC fans have subscribed to ESPN+, but it looks as if HEA did not televise its women's championship, nor did the CHA televise its. Nonetheless, it's highly unlikely that fans from any of these leagues subscribe to the Big Ten Network. Fox Sports does carry BTN shows, but what if an ECAC cord-cutter only shelled out for ESPN+ and has no cable sports package that allows access to Fox Sports?

In just seems odd that a conference-based network from a different region would have the broadcasting rights while a national, conference-independent network like ESPN+ -- or even a regional, conference-independent network like NESN -- does not.

Can any of you explain this?

Can't explain it except to say (1) BTN had the games last year and, probably more importantly (2) Wisco and Minny have been dominant teams for years, so BTN figured that at least one if not both of those schools will be in the Frozen Four and it was therefore worth securing the rights.

marty

Quote from: SwampyI also have some other questions. This Sun article gives the brackets. Note that three Big Ten teams and three ECAC teams are in the eight-team field.

For the semifinals and Finals the bracket diagram also gives the location of and names the TV network broadcasting the semifinal and final games. The games are all at BU's Agganis Arena and, in all three cases, the broadcaster is the Big Ten Network.

Now maybe I can understand this for top bracket, which includes an OSU v Minnesota match up, so its semifinal will include (at least and at most) one B1G team. But the bottom bracket includes only one B1G team, Wisconsin, and two ECAC teams, Clarkson and Princeton, who could possibly meet in the semifinal and then advance to the championship game, where one of them might play Cornell.

So how does the Big Ten Network get exclusive rights to televise these games? Boston is not exactly Big-Ten territory. And would a Big Ten audience tune in to watch an all-ECAC semifinal and final?

And what about the fans of the other teams? ECAC fans have subscribed to ESPN+, but it looks as if HEA did not televise its women's championship, nor did the CHA televise its. Nonetheless, it's highly unlikely that fans from any of these leagues subscribe to the Big Ten Network. Fox Sports does carry BTN shows, but what if an ECAC cord-cutter only shelled out for ESPN+ and has no cable sports package that allows access to Fox Sports?

In just seems odd that a conference-based network from a different region would have the broadcasting rights while a national, conference-independent network like ESPN+ -- or even a regional, conference-independent network like NESN -- does not.

Can any of you explain this?

There isn't a B1G League in women's hockey,  or am I mistaken?

In which case it might be that we're lucky they picked up the broadcast.  And unlucky that Spectrum doesn't include that channel except for perhaps on their "Gold" package screw job. Or again,  am I mistaken?
"When we came off, [Bitz] said, 'Thank God you scored that goal,'" Moulson said. "He would've killed me if I didn't."

upprdeck

get the fubo stream free 7 day trial