Cornell vs. UNH scores and updates- spoilers inside

[jy3]

so i am bored waiting for lecture to start so i figured i would start this off :-)

let's go RED! ::nut::



Post Edited (04-10-03 09:54)

[Scott Goldsmith]

Palahicky I believe.

[Scott Goldsmith]

They called the goal back.

[Denison]

Scott,

How much time in the period & why was goal called back

[dsr11]

Any score yet?  I'm stuck at work....

[Niles Donegan]

UNH 1, Cornell 0.  End of first period.  Cornell's goal was disallowed.

[Chris 02]

After a long delay, they decided that Palahicky's stick was too high.  Replays showed it was really close.  The rule is 4ft.  Not sure how they determine that from a replay.

[John ILR \'02]

They said that Palahichy high sticked the goal hence the call back. He hacked it out od the air but contact with the puck looked to be below tittie level - if thats 4 ft, its damn close and I don't know how they could overturn conclusively, but they did.

[ZooeyDog]

An absolutely horrible, horrible, HORRIBLE use of instant replay. The delay was about 5 minutes (it seemed far longer), and ESPN2's "sideline reporter" reported that it was "chaos in the replay booth." The rule is that if the tape is inconclusive, the on-ice call stands (the on-ice call was a goal); you tell me: if it takes 5 minutes to look at what amounts to two camera angles over and over and over and over, how can you then say the replay was conclusive?

A TERRIBLE call....

Harumph,

ZD

[jy3]

yeah just saw it on replay - it was damn close. i think that they should have gone with the original ref call on the ice, whichever that was ::screwy::

[Rob]

I didn't see it, but the UH announcers doing the audio were shocked that the goal was disallowed, and these guys are completely biased in favor of UH.

[jy3]

damn i was hoping that it was obvious after hearing on the radio in teh car that it was disallowed. this is makes me mad
::pissed::

[Denison]

UNH 2 Cornell 0

[Dan]

3-0 UNH.  Ugh

[Denison]

unh 3 Cornell 0



What is happening?