Looking Ahead

Started by wakester2468, February 08, 2017, 12:27:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Trotsky

Quote from: BearLoverObviously getting a bye is our biggest concern, but finishing 3rd instead of 4th and thereby dodging Q would also be big.

It would also mean avoiding 1 in the SF, and with this logjam the 1 is likely the team that gets very hot late.

Of course, the ideal solution is to be that team.  :)

CU2007

Quote from: Trotsky
Quote from: BearLoverObviously getting a bye is our biggest concern, but finishing 3rd instead of 4th and thereby dodging Q would also be big.

It would also mean avoiding 1 in the SF, and with this logjam the 1 is likely the team that gets very hot late.

Of course, the ideal solution is to be that team.  :)


...and we come full circle to "Just win, baby"

BearLover

Quote from: Trotsky
Quote from: BearLoverObviously getting a bye is our biggest concern, but finishing 3rd instead of 4th and thereby dodging Q would also be big.

It would also mean avoiding 1 in the SF, and with this logjam the 1 is likely the team that gets very hot late.

Of course, the ideal solution is to be that team.  :)
Well, currently U looks more likely to finish first than H, and I definitely fear H more than any other ECAC team.  (I also don't believe in momentum in sports.)

Trotsky


jtwcornell91

Quote from: Jim HylaTime for.............

ECAC Playoff Possibilities Stuff

I PM'd jtw and hopefully he's got the time to put it up.

Please...........::cheer::

Have at it:

http://www.elynah.com/tbrw/tbrw.cgi?ecac.cgimain
http://www.elynah.com/tbrw/tbrw.cgi?ecac.nutshell

PM with bug reports, please!

Trotsky

Quote from: jtwcornell91Have at it

Case 00: Pessimism: Cornell 1-3 (only win v RPI) and all the rest of the results were decided as follows: split the league into top 5 bottom 7, top always beats bottom, in intragroup home always wins.  Result:

5. Cornell 27 pts (lose tiebreaker vs Q)


Case 01: Determinism: Case 00 but give Cornell the wins against Clarkson and Union so the top/bottom rules are universal

3. Cornell 31 pts (win tiebreaker vs SLU)


Case 02: Optimism: Case 00 plus Cornell sweep

2. Cornell 33 pts (win tiebreaker vs Union)


Case 03: Optimism and Screw Harvard: Case 02 plus SLU beats Harvard

1. Cornell 33 pts (win tiebreaker vs Union)

Jim Hyla

Quote from: Trotsky
Quote from: jtwcornell91Have at it

Case 00: Pessimism: Cornell 1-3 (only win v RPI) and all the rest of the results were decided as follows: split the league into top 5 bottom 7, top always beats bottom, in intragroup home always wins.  Result:

5. Cornell 27 pts (lose tiebreaker vs Q)


Case 01: Determinism: Case 00 but give Cornell the wins against Clarkson and Union so the top/bottom rules are universal

3. Cornell 31 pts (win tiebreaker vs SLU)


Case 02: Optimism: Case 00 plus Cornell sweep

2. Cornell 33 pts (win tiebreaker vs Union)


Case 03: Optimism and Screw Harvard: Case 02 plus SLU beats Harvard

1. Cornell 33 pts (win tiebreaker vs Union)

And you basically reaffirmed Playoff Status, Cornell.

So as they say, let's just win.
"Cornell Fans Made the Timbers Tremble", Boston Globe, March/1970
Cornell lawyers stopped the candy throwing. Jan/2005

marty

"When we came off, [Bitz] said, 'Thank God you scored that goal,'" Moulson said. "He would've killed me if I didn't."

RichH

Quote from: martyFrom USCHO:

http://www.uscho.com/2017/02/13/tripping-penalty-gets-st-lawrence-freshman-sam-kauppila-one-game-suspension-from-ecac-hockey/

Freshman forward, who has played in fewer than half their games, only 1 point on the season. Not an impactful loss for them.

Beeeej

Northeastern currently leads Boston College 2-1 in the 3rd of the Beanpot consy. Could have interesting PWR implications, though maybe not beyond taking BC out of their "tie" with us.

EDIT: Just like that, it's tied up.
Beeeej, Esq.

"Cornell isn't an organization.  It's a loose affiliation of independent fiefdoms united by a common hockey team."
   - Steve Worona

Al DeFlorio

Quote from: BeeeejNortheastern currently leads Boston College 2-1 in the 3rd of the Beanpot consy. Could have interesting PWR implications, though maybe not beyond taking BC out of their "tie" with us.
BC ties at 2; 6 min left
Al DeFlorio '65

Beeeej

Looks like Northeastern pulled it out, 4-2 final.
Beeeej, Esq.

"Cornell isn't an organization.  It's a loose affiliation of independent fiefdoms united by a common hockey team."
   - Steve Worona

GBR1234

What are the PWR implications of the Harvard v. BU game?

LGR14

Quote from: GBR1234What are the PWR implications of the Harvard v. BU game?

A Harvard win helps a little bit but probably not enough to move to 12th. A BU win knocks CU back to 14th.

Dafatone

Quote from: LGR14
Quote from: GBR1234What are the PWR implications of the Harvard v. BU game?

A Harvard win helps a little bit but probably not enough to move to 12th. A BU win knocks CU back to 14th.

Are you certain of that? It's the BC/Providence comparison that BC upsets to tie us.  We beat them with a decent chunk of RPI edge.  Not sure that'd flip.