Clarkson 3 vs. Cornell 3 1/20/17

[Hooking]

Weak teams talk about bad hops and bad luck. Strong teams talk about effort and game plans.

[Dafatone]

Weak teams talk about bad hops and bad luck. Strong teams talk about effort and game plans.

Meanwhile, hockey teams tend not to talk about game plans, because you generally try not to make those sorts of things too public.

[Hooking]

Ever notice that the attitude of a team is reflected in the attitude of its fans? This same phenomenon is found in the attitude of holders of public office and attitude of their fans.

[billhoward]

Ever notice that the attitude of a team is reflected in the attitude of its fans? This same phenomenon is found in the attitude of holders of public office and attitude of their fans.

We need a Women's March on Lynah, then.

[Al DeFlorio]

Ever notice that the attitude of a team is reflected in the attitude of its fans?

Truth is, I never noticed this.  And I certainly don't notice it in this year's Cornell hockey team.  What I do notice is a very negative attitude on the part of you.

[BearLover]

Ever notice that the attitude of a team is reflected in the attitude of its fans?

Truth is, I never noticed this.  And I certainly don't notice it in this year's Cornell hockey team.  What I do notice is a very negative attitude on the part of you.

I've noticed a positive team attitude and a positive fan attitude?

[Hooking]

Have you not noticed references to bad breaks, bad luck, road trips, etc. on this site to explain some close ones (losses)? I did not make these excuses but I surely read them. Is there some unwritten rule against hypothesizing about changes in play and strategy? I watched Cornell play a lot of "dump and run" hockey in the 60's. I watched them win a lot of games too.

[BearLover]

Zero discipline on this team.

[Al DeFlorio]

Have you not noticed references to bad breaks, bad luck, road trips, etc. on this site to explain some close ones (losses)? I did not make these excuses but I surely read them. Is there some unwritten rule against hypothesizing about changes in play and strategy? I watched Cornell play a lot of "dump and run" hockey in the 60's. I watched them win a lot of games too.

So did I.  But I don't whine when the team is 12-4-2.

[BearLover]

Great win, but the number of penalties coming in the offensive zone/off the faceoff/after the play is over is going to cost this team at some point.

[marty]

Ever notice that the attitude of a team is reflected in the attitude of its fans?

Truth is, I never noticed this.  And I certainly don't notice it in this year's Cornell hockey team.  What I do notice is a very negative attitude on the part of you.

I'm not sure how one would measure"team attitude" . Sounds like a dissertation topic.

Fan attitude means what?

% of game that those in section A stand? Creativity of cheers? Blah blah blah....

What i notice is that the boo bears have had a bad couple of weeks. Since they are posting less can we assume they are without an Internet connection?

[ugarte]

Great win, but the number of penalties coming in the offensive zone/off the faceoff/after the play is over is going to cost this team at some point.

I was only listening but without even seeing it the Kaldis retaliation penalty was terrible.

Refresh my recollection: are these guys going to miss a game?

[andyw2100]

Refresh my recollection: are these guys going to miss a game?

No. They were not disqualifications.

[ugarte]

Refresh my recollection: are these guys going to miss a game?

No. They were not disqualifications.

thx

while i've got you here, can you tell me why bearlover and i were discussing this in the clarkson thread?

[andyw2100]

Refresh my recollection: are these guys going to miss a game?

No. They were not disqualifications.

thx

while i've got you here, can you tell me why bearlover and i were discussing this in the clarkson thread?

I noticed that too, but I rolled with it!