Women 2013-14

[Jim Hyla]

This is my first look at the new women's box score. Check it out, it's wonderful. Will the men do the same?

[marty]

This is my first look at the new women's box score. Check it out, it's wonderful. Will the men do the same?

Not sure what the question is here but if you mean beat up on Clarkson we can hope. The number 12 ECAC  preseason pick Knights are now 5-1-1.

[Trotsky]

This is my first look at the new women's box score. Check it out, it's wonderful. Will the men do the same?

Not sure what the question is here but if you mean beat up on Clarkson we can hope. The number 12 ECAC  preseason pick Knights are now 5-1-1.

He means will we have great box scores (exhaustive, clean, useful) for the men, too.  He's right -- that box score is excellent.

[Jim Hyla]

This is my first look at the new women's box score. Check it out, it's wonderful. Will the men do the same?

Not sure what the question is here but if you mean beat up on Clarkson we can hope. The number 12 ECAC  preseason pick Knights are now 5-1-1.

He means will we have great box scores (exhaustive, clean, useful) for the men, too.  He's right -- that box score is excellent.

You got it!

[Weder]

This is my first look at the new women's box score. Check it out, it's wonderful. Will the men do the same?

Not sure what the question is here but if you mean beat up on Clarkson we can hope. The number 12 ECAC  preseason pick Knights are now 5-1-1.

He means will we have great box scores (exhaustive, clean, useful) for the men, too.  He's right -- that box score is excellent.

You got it!

Are you supposed to credit assists on an own goal? I can't find anything that prohibits it in the NCAA scoring rules, but I thought that no assists were to be listed in that case.

[Jim Hyla]

Women win 6-4

[David Harding]

This is my first look at the new women's box score. Check it out, it's wonderful. Will the men do the same?

Not sure what the question is here but if you mean beat up on Clarkson we can hope. The number 12 ECAC  preseason pick Knights are now 5-1-1.

He means will we have great box scores (exhaustive, clean, useful) for the men, too.  He's right -- that box score is excellent.

You got it!

The format is a little different and it's a black, white, and grey PDF file instead of a web page, but the men's box score from last night seems to me to have pretty close to the same information content which I claim makes it useful.  
http://cornellbigred.com/documents/2013/10/25/102513_uno_box_1.pdf?id=5587

[Jim Hyla]

This is my first look at the new women's box score. Check it out, it's wonderful. Will the men do the same?

Not sure what the question is here but if you mean beat up on Clarkson we can hope. The number 12 ECAC  preseason pick Knights are now 5-1-1.

He means will we have great box scores (exhaustive, clean, useful) for the men, too.  He's right -- that box score is excellent.

You got it!

The format is a little different and it's a black, white, and grey PDF file instead of a web page, but the men's box score from last night seems to me to have pretty close to the same information content which I claim makes it useful.  
http://cornellbigred.com/documents/2013/10/25/102513_uno_box_1.pdf?id=5587

I wouldn't, and I didn't, claim that the usual box score isn't useful. The difference is that the women's page has beauty and ease of reading. The men's page is strictly utilitarian, the info is there but it doesn't capture your interest to stay and look, like the women's does. The new format looks more like a page that Jobs would design, as opposed to the Gates men's site. And you can't find a Play-by-Play on the men's.

[Trotsky]

I wouldn't, and I didn't, claim that the usual box score isn't useful. The difference is that the women's page has beauty and ease of reading. The men's page is strictly utilitarian, the info is there but it doesn't capture your interest to stay and look, like the women's does. The new format looks more like a page that Jobs would design, as opposed to the Gates men's site. And you can't find a Play-by-Play on the men's.

Personally, I prefer this style.  ;-)

Less is usually more.  The women's box score linked above is very clean and manages to display a lot of information without feeling cluttered or moving the eye around too much.  This guy would approve.

[ACM]

I wouldn't, and I didn't, claim that the usual box score isn't useful. The difference is that the women's page has beauty and ease of reading. The men's page is strictly utilitarian, the info is there but it doesn't capture your interest to stay and look, like the women's does. The new format looks more like a page that Jobs would design, as opposed to the Gates men's site. And you can't find a Play-by-Play on the men's.

Personally, I prefer this style.  ;-)

Less is usually more.  The women's box score linked above is very clean and manages to display a lot of information without feeling cluttered or moving the eye around too much.  This guy would approve.

Box scores that don't include individual penalty information are useless.

[Trotsky]

Box scores that don't include individual penalty information are useless.

Yes, who can forget the PIM totals that determined the outcomes of our national championship games?

[ACM]

Box scores that don't include individual penalty information are useless.

Yes, who can forget the PIM totals that determined the outcomes of our national championship games?

Adequate for your purposes, perhaps. Not mine.

[Trotsky]

Box scores that don't include individual penalty information are useless.

Yes, who can forget the PIM totals that determined the outcomes of our national championship games?

Adequate for your purposes, perhaps. Not mine.

Ah, but your purposes also require the winning raffle number...

[imafrshmn]

Will you geezers lay off each other? We've got a hockey game about to begin!

[Jim Hyla]

Emily Fulton is ECAC POTW.