CU at Union

[unionhockeynews]

I also have postgame pressers with Schafer as well as Bardreau/Ferlin: click here

[Johnny 5]

"I thought we were playing the Russian Red Army from back in the 70s..."

All I can say is, "na zdorovie"!

Ferlin looked like the Ferlin of old, Bardreau is back (!!!) and Espo was his usual, dependable self.
Plus, no stupid penalties!

Looking forward to tonight, for a change.

::banana::

[upprdeck]

more interesting is what happens if you commit a major of some type that would be a DQ does that also get ignored?

[css228]

"I thought we were playing the Russian Red Army from back in the 70s..."

All I can say is, "na zdorovie"!

Ferlin looked like the Ferlin of old, Bardreau is back (!!!) and Espo was his usual, dependable self.
Plus, no stupid penalties!

Looking forward to tonight, for a change.

::banana::

Well McCarron did take that one in the offensive zone when we had a powerplay.

[Johnny 5]

"I thought we were playing the Russian Red Army from back in the 70s..."

All I can say is, "na zdorovie"!

Ferlin looked like the Ferlin of old, Bardreau is back (!!!) and Espo was his usual, dependable self.
Plus, no stupid penalties!

Looking forward to tonight, for a change.

::banana::

Well McCarron did take that one in the offensive zone when we had a powerplay.

Ooops!
Well, at least he didn't get a DQ for it!!

Maybe I missed it because I was watching the Union video feed on my laptop.
It made Redcast look like high-def.
The vid was blurry & red tinted, and the audio was indecipherable.
I finally used the WHCU audio.
What a bargain for $8.95!!

::rock::

[TimV]

The vid was blurry & red tinted, and the audio was indecipherable.

That's funny... I was AT the game and noticed the same thing:  everything was red tinted and the audio was indecipherable.::woot::

[css228]

"I thought we were playing the Russian Red Army from back in the 70s..."

All I can say is, "na zdorovie"!

Ferlin looked like the Ferlin of old, Bardreau is back (!!!) and Espo was his usual, dependable self.
Plus, no stupid penalties!

Looking forward to tonight, for a change.

::banana::

Well McCarron did take that one in the offensive zone when we had a powerplay.

Ooops!
Well, at least he didn't get a DQ for it!!

Maybe I missed it because I was watching the Union video feed on my laptop.
It made Redcast look like high-def.
The vid was blurry & red tinted, and the audio was indecipherable.
I finally used the WHCU audio.
What a bargain for $8.95!!

::rock::

Yeah, it was that power play during the 2nd that we were on for about a minute and dominating. Took a tripping I believe.

[Jim Hyla]

For those who want it, the game is being rebroadcast on TWC S2 & TWC S3, 1026 & 1027 in Syracuse, Sunday at 11:30 AM. I haven't seen it listed on their Sports On Demand. It might only go to Cap District.

[ACM]

Also, on the off chance that Jason ever visits here, and for our edification, can somebody who knows (Arthur, I assume) please confirm the following situation.

...

1. Here is a link to the rule book: NCAA Publications site. This will give you an opportunity to become as frustrated with the (poor) organization and (lack of) style that makes figuring out the rules so difficult. Maybe Age can add the link to the forum sidebar.

2. The Secretary / Rules Editor of the NCAA Men's and Women's Ice Hockey Rules Committee is Steve Piotrowski, spiotrowski@ccha.com. I'm sure he would be glad to give his interpretation of the specific situation you cited. I looked in the obvious places, but couldn't find anything.

[Jim Hyla]

As long as we're talking rules, here is a link to a USCHO article on a change in recruiting rules.

[marty]

As long as we're talking rules, here is a link to a USCHO article on a change in recruiting rules.

Limits on electronic communication such as email and text messages were removed as long as the messages are private.

Stalking allowed as long as it is done in private.::whistle::

[profudge]

Quote from Adam's rule changes article I find interesting:  

A potentially interesting side effect to that rule is that it also pertains to a signed offer of admission or financial aid. This would allow Ivy League schools, and others that don't use Letters of Intent, to also treat those recruits like their own student-athletes. The ramification may be that Ivy League players who signed an offer of admission or financial aid, will be "hands off" to other teams, they same way those who have signed NLIs currently are. Officials are still examining the ramifications.

The changes are set to go into effect August 1, 2013.

[Jim Hyla]

Quote from Adam's rule changes article I find interesting:  

A potentially interesting side effect to that rule is that it also pertains to a signed offer of admission or financial aid. This would allow Ivy League schools, and others that don't use Letters of Intent, to also treat those recruits like their own student-athletes. The ramification may be that Ivy League players who signed an offer of admission or financial aid, will be "hands off" to other teams, they same way those who have signed NLIs currently are. Officials are still examining the ramifications.

The changes are set to go into effect August 1, 2013.

I never thought that signed offers of admission or financial aid were binding. schools could treat them like their own student athletes, mean they could come and watch games, etc., but I would surmise that a potential student could just drop out and go to another school.  That is unless the Ivy League is really going to change the document that is signed.