NCAA regionals 2011

[BigRedHockeyFan]

CC putting on quite a show.

BC forgot to play defense.

[Chris '03]

CC putting on quite a show.

BC forgot to play defense.

If Yale had remembered last year, they would have been in the Frozen Four. Is John Muse the only goalie to give up 7+ goals twice in the NCAA tournament? Probably the first to give up 7 and win.

[billhoward]

Anyone else think ESPNU should have thought twice about their slogan, "Never Graduate"?

Like the seat belt campaign, "Belt Your Kids." Child-protection do-gooders came out of the renewable-growth woodwork.

Because child protection is something we should all fight against...

Was anyone tempted in high school to wear a Drug Awareness Week T-shirt? It looks so different on a HS ROTC student and the kid with the dreadlocks and sandals.

[upprdeck]

the on ice call in the michigan game was no goal and they over ruled it on some vague film that really never showed the puck?

[Rosey]

the on ice call in the michigan game was no goal and they over ruled it on some vague film that really never showed the puck?

Ah... that explains it: I thought I saw a ref pointing at the goal in the intermission replay I saw, so I thought the on-ice call was *for* a goal. According to a story on USCHO, the call was *no* goal and then they ruled it a goal 10 minutes later. Now I am less confused. :-)

[Rosey]

RPI/NoDak scoreless at 5 minutes into the first period. Go puckman. :-)

[Rosey]

Urp. 1-0 NoDak at 5:25, after a lengthy delay for an injured NoDak player.

[Chris 02]

1-0 NoDak after one period.

[Scersk '97]

This is turning into a rough game, and most of the hits have been relatively clean.

[Rosey]

Bad play by the RPI goalie compounded by a ham-handed attempt to clear the front of the net by RPI D-man. 2-0 NoDak.

[Scersk '97]

And it's also starting to remind me a lot of our game vs. NoDak in 1997.  RPI is fighting hard, but NoDak is just a bit too much for them to handle.

[Rosey]

3-0 NoDak on a toe drag deke around the RPI D-man. Nice move. "Talent".

[Jim Hyla]

the on ice call in the michigan game was no goal and they over ruled it on some vague film that really never showed the puck?

Ah... that explains it: I thought I saw a ref pointing at the goal in the intermission replay I saw, so I thought the on-ice call was *for* a goal. According to a story on USCHO, the call was *no* goal and then they ruled it a goal 10 minutes later. Now I am less confused. :-)

Don't just read USCHO:-}, CHN shows a screen shot of the best video that I saw last night. The replay of this showed white between the puck and the goal line. Putting that together with the overhead, the puck was over.

[Rosey]

the on ice call in the michigan game was no goal and they over ruled it on some vague film that really never showed the puck?

Ah... that explains it: I thought I saw a ref pointing at the goal in the intermission replay I saw, so I thought the on-ice call was *for* a goal. According to a story on USCHO, the call was *no* goal and then they ruled it a goal 10 minutes later. Now I am less confused. :-)

Don't just read USCHO:-}, CHN shows a screen shot of the best video that I saw last night. The replay of this showed white between the puck and the goal line. Putting that together with the overhead, the puck was over.

I wasn't using USCHO to determine whether the puck actually went over or not: I don't have any opinion regarding that because I didn't see it in person or on film and I don't trust lossy video encodings. I was simply pointing out that what I thought was the case—that the on-ice call was for a goal—was actually wrong: the on-ice call was *no* goal, which the news reporters on ESPN3 didn't make clear.

On another note, now 4-0 NoDak. Looks like 2/3 EZAC teams are going down in the first round.

[billhoward]

Good luck, Yale. Boola.