RPI 1 at Cornell 0

Started by Trotsky, March 13, 2009, 05:08:48 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Rita

Damn.

RPI scores. 2:36 left in the 3rd period.

Opps, 2:46. We need those extra 10 seconds.

Rosey

RPI scores.

2004 all over again... ugh.
[ homepage ]

billhoward

Oh, jeez, there goes Scrivens' shutout.

Rosey

Scrivens should be looking at the bench from the inside right now... good god.
[ homepage ]

Rita

Empty net.

Time out Cornell, 28 seconds left.

LGR!!

billhoward


Rosey

I didn't know it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows.
[ homepage ]

scoop85

So, I have to get up to answer the door, only to come back to hear the RPI score.  Oy! ::worry::

Trotsky


scoop85

[quote billhoward]Oh, jeez, there goes Scrivens' shutout.[/quote]

Uh, I think that would have only been a concern if we actually had a lead at the time ::cry::

billhoward

[quote Kyle Rose]I didn't know it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows.[/quote]
"Twins, Max. Twins." -- Annie Hall

upperdeck

it wasnt a bad effort, just no goals. you have to get one PP goal out of all the puck control we had on it and how many times are we standing in front of the net to get tackled or miss the shot.  we had about 3x as many quality chance and nothing to show for it.

Jordan 04

[quote scoop85][quote billhoward]Oh, jeez, there goes Scrivens' shutout.[/quote]

Uh, I think that would have only been a concern if we actually had a lead at the time ::cry::[/quote]

I would think it a much bigger concern since we didn't have a lead at the time.

oceanst41

I am blown away with how many late game let downs there have been in the second half. Just because we could see this coming after two periods doesn't make it right. ::bang::

Well we'll see what this team is made of tomorrow. I don't know what the PWR implications of this are, but I'm guessing they have nothing to fall back on right now, at least nothing very sturdy.

scoop85

[quote Jordan 04][quote scoop85][quote billhoward]Oh, jeez, there goes Scrivens' shutout.[/quote]

Uh, I think that would have only been a concern if we actually had a lead at the time ::cry::[/quote]

I would think it a much bigger concern since we didn't have a lead at the time.[/quote]

Yeah, that didn't come out right.  What I meant was whether Scrivens' got a shutout was the least of my concerns, although of course if he had his shutout we'd at least still be playing.