gate 4 - Q 3 OT Final

Jacob '06 · February 24, 2008, 01:45:19 PM

[quote Jim Hyla]Q on PP second goal[/quote]

Did they ever say what the penalty was for? I thought for sure the penalty was on Q for a hook/trip and so did the broadcasters and then it happened to be a penalty on Colgate.

daredevilcu · February 24, 2008, 01:46:46 PM

Unsportsmanlike conduct, probably diving. He got hooked, but then he made absolutely no effort to get up until he slammed into the boards 50 feet later. Definitely embellishing trying to get a call.

Jacob '06 · February 24, 2008, 01:53:09 PM

[quote daredevilcu]Unsportsmanlike conduct, probably diving. He got hooked, but then he made absolutely no effort to get up until he slammed into the boards 50 feet later. Definitely embellishing trying to get a call.[/quote]

It was also definitely a hook/trip by the Q player. I disagree with the call.

Jim Hyla · February 24, 2008, 01:55:01 PM

[quote Jacob '06][quote daredevilcu]Unsportsmanlike conduct, probably diving. He got hooked, but then he made absolutely no effort to get up until he slammed into the boards 50 feet later. Definitely embellishing trying to get a call.[/quote]

It was also definitely a hook/trip by the Q player. I disagree with the call.[/quote]

They did call diving, according to Q announcers.

Jim Hyla · February 24, 2008, 01:55:40 PM

gate goal to tie it 2-2.

daredevilcu · February 24, 2008, 01:57:24 PM

[quote Jacob '06][quote daredevilcu]Unsportsmanlike conduct, probably diving. He got hooked, but then he made absolutely no effort to get up until he slammed into the boards 50 feet later. Definitely embellishing trying to get a call.[/quote]

It was also definitely a hook/trip by the Q player. I disagree with the call.[/quote]

Would've been a good call to send both players to the box.

Al DeFlorio · February 24, 2008, 02:11:44 PM

[quote daredevilcu][quote Jacob '06][quote daredevilcu]Unsportsmanlike conduct, probably diving. He got hooked, but then he made absolutely no effort to get up until he slammed into the boards 50 feet later. Definitely embellishing trying to get a call.[/quote]

It was also definitely a hook/trip by the Q player. I disagree with the call.[/quote]

Would've been a good call to send both players to the box.[/quote]
Right. Exactly the situation where what appear to be two contradictory calls actually make sense.

daredevilcu · February 24, 2008, 02:19:54 PM

Colgate goal waved off, man in the crease. Replay shows that it's a good call.

Also, lol at the Q-Pac band. Who plays Final Countdown in a tie game with 17 minutes left in the 3rd?

Rita · February 24, 2008, 02:22:25 PM

Colgate just scored to make it 3-2. About 16 minutes left. Go 'Gate!

Jim Hyla · February 24, 2008, 02:22:46 PM

gate goal, hold on.

Trotsky · February 24, 2008, 02:23:14 PM

Burton converts on Leitch giveaway. 3-2 Raiders.

Jim Hyla · February 24, 2008, 02:28:09 PM

another Q PP goal 3-3

Jim Hyla · February 24, 2008, 02:47:29 PM

So what's the tiebreaker for 3 teams tied? Is it still record against eac other. In which case a Q tie doesn't help us much.

edit: I'm wrong the wins against Q puts us ahead of them, since they only tied Union once, and have losses otherwise.

calgARI '07 · February 24, 2008, 02:57:39 PM

[quote Jim Hyla]So what's the tiebreaker for 3 teams tied? Is it still record against eac other. In which case a Q tie doesn't help us much.

edit: I'm wrong the wins against Q puts us ahead of them, since they only tied Union once, and have losses otherwise.[/quote]

Well isn't just overall wins the first tie-breaker which Cornell has on both Quinnipiac and Union.

Trotsky · February 24, 2008, 02:58:41 PM

[quote Jim Hyla]So what's the tiebreaker for 3 teams tied? Is it still record against eac other. In which case a Q tie doesn't help us much.

edit: I'm wrong the wins against Q puts us ahead of them, since they only tied Union once, and have losses otherwise.[/quote]A 3-way would go:

Union
Cornell
Q