Cornell 0 Quinnipiac 0

[scoop85]

[quote TimV]Have we ever started out unscored upon after the first week in the league?[/quote]

Have we ever scored one goal in two games and come away with three points?

[Larry72]

Starting off the season with two shutouts appears to be a first from what I can tell in looking at the archives.  The closest Cornell has ever come was back in the 1967-68 season:

11/25/67  7-0 over Loyola-Montreal (All non-conference games counted back then!)
11/29/67  8-1 over RPI
12/02/67  4-0 over Guelph

BTW, note the date when the season actually started.  Back then...hockey couldn't start till after the last football game. Fortunately that practice ended around 1983.

[Trotsky]

[quote scoop85][quote TimV]Have we ever started out unscored upon after the first week in the league?[/quote]

Have we ever scored one goal in two games and come away with three points?[/quote]

No.  However, in consecutive games in 2005 they beat SLU and Colgate 1-0.

They have only scored 1 goal over consecutive league games 8 times (6 times under Schafer).  Fun fact: in consecutive games in 1973 they lost 9-0 to BU and 10-1 to UNH.

[Trotsky]

[quote Larry72]Starting off the season with two shutouts appears to be a first from what I can tell in looking at the archives.[/quote]

In 1908 Cornell shut out their opponents in all 4 games. **]

In 1940, after two games they had given up 33 goals (9 to Colgate, 24 to BC).

[David Harding]

When penalties are not in effect and not visible on the clock and one minor penalty is assessed to one player of each team at the same stoppage of play, these penalties shall be served without substitution.


When penalties are not in effect and not visible on the clock and one minor penalty is assessed to one player of each team, with an additional penalty or penalties (minor or major) assessed at the same stoppage of play, immediate substitutions on ice shall be made for an equal number of coincidental minor penalties (penalties assessed during the same stoppage of play) to each team so penalized. The penalized players substituted for shall take their places on the penalty bench and shall not leave the penalty bench until the first stoppage of play after the expiration of their respective penalties. Penalties of the players for which substitutions have been made shall not be taken into account for the purpose of the delayed penalty rule (see 4-8-a).

When penalties are in effect and visible on the clock and coincidental minor penalties are imposed against players of both teams, immediate substitutions on ice shall be made for an equal number of coincidental minor penalties to each team so penalized. The penalized players substituted for shall take their places on the penalty bench and shall not leave the penalty bench until the first stoppage of play after the expiration of their respective penalties. Penalties of the players for which substitutions have been made shall not be taken into account for the purpose of the delayed penalty rule (see 4-8-a).

Any other penalties assessed at the same stoppage of play as minor penalties covered in this rule shall be served in the manner prescribed elsewhere in these rules and shall not affect the application of this rule.

[ACM]

Let me try to translate into English the section of the rule book that David Harding posted ...

There is one, and only one, situation in which coincidental penalties affect on-ice manpower, and that is when both of the following conditions are in effect:
 - no penalties on the clock at the time the coincidental penalties are called (i.e., both teams at full and equal strength)
 - one, and only one, minor penalty called on each team.

In all other situations, the on-ice manpower is not affected by coincidental penalties.

[Killer]

[quote Trotsky][quote scoop85][quote TimV]Have we ever started out unscored upon after the first week in the league?[/quote]

Have we ever scored one goal in two games and come away with three points?[/quote]

No.  However, in consecutive games in 2005 they beat SLU and Colgate 1-0.

They have only scored 1 goal over consecutive league games 8 times (6 times under Schafer).  Fun fact: in consecutive games in 1973 they lost 9-0 to beat BU 1-0 and lost 10-1 to UNH.[/quote]

I fixed the titanic error in your post.

[ursusminor]

[quote Killer][quote Trotsky][quote scoop85][quote TimV]Have we ever started out unscored upon after the first week in the league?[/quote]

Have we ever scored one goal in two games and come away with three points?[/quote]

No.  However, in consecutive games in 2005 they beat SLU and Colgate 1-0.

They have only scored 1 goal over consecutive league games 8 times (6 times under Schafer).  Fun fact: in consecutive games in 1973 they lost 9-0 to beat BU 1-0 and lost 10-1 to UNH.[/quote]

I fixed the titanic error in your post.[/quote]

Wasn't that a decloe error?

[Killer]

**][quote ursusminor][quote Killer][quote Trotsky][quote scoop85][quote TimV]Have we ever started out unscored upon after the first week in the league?[/quote]

Have we ever scored one goal in two games and come away with three points?[/quote]

No.  However, in consecutive games in 2005 they beat SLU and Colgate 1-0.

They have only scored 1 goal over consecutive league games 8 times (6 times under Schafer).  Fun fact: in consecutive games in 1973 they lost 9-0 to beat BU 1-0 and lost 10-1 to UNH.[/quote]

I fixed the titanic error in your post.[/quote]

Wasn't that a decloe error?[/quote]

Absolutely, but even when I tried it in French, it didn't translate to anything that made sense, so...