cu- lowell

[Trotsky]

The delayed penalty/goal thing has been the rule for a number of years now http://wcha.com/pdf/2010rulechanges.pdf

IMO this, along with ending the two-line pass and forcing icing team players to remain on the ice, is one of the best rule changes we've had.

[Beeeej]

The delayed penalty/goal thing has been the rule for a number of years now http://wcha.com/pdf/2010rulechanges.pdf

That's certainly "relatively recent" compared to the length of Cornell hockey fandom for most people on this board.

[marty]

I've decided to do my version of "Fifty Shades of Red" and self flagellate by watching the replay of Saturday's game on ESPN.  

With regard to the too many men on the ice call against UML during the UML penalty kill, I get that the only penalty that can be called on a video review is a major.  I don't understand why in this particular situation the rule cannot be changed to allow a penalty.  It would seem pretty reasonable to allow a review to determine that there were too many men.

With regard to the minor for interference on MacCarron becoming a major on video review.  How many majors for interference are called?  I don't ever remember seeing one. :-(

On the other hand, I'm also planning to watch the third period of the PSU-Union game to raise my spirits a bit.

[CowbellGuy]

They really should be proud. Especially with the injuries they had, this was a team that got it together and provided one of the most fun seasons in quite a while

+1 [god, i wish the ELF still had that feature]

I dunno. Do you people think you can behave yourselves this time?

[French Rage]

They really should be proud. Especially with the injuries they had, this was a team that got it together and provided one of the most fun seasons in quite a while

+1 [god, i wish the ELF still had that feature]

I dunno. Do you people think you can behave yourselves this time?

Have we ever been able to?