No. 1 Section @ Pepsi

[Felix Rodriguez]

I just called Ticket Master (I HATE ticket master BTW,  nothing like paying a user fee for the assiest service you can find ANYWHERE).

They said all of the lower deck is sold out. I find that a little hard to believe given that the arena is bigger than Lake Placid and Harvard / Yale / Dartmouth don't bring that many fans.

Plus they didn't let me choose my section. I call bullshit, and I'll buy them at the door.

[ugarte]

The lower deck might be 'sold out' in the sense of "reserved for the schools and not yet returned."  But I am going to buy at the door also.

[jason]

If Cornell makes it to Albany, obviously they'll be the highest seed. Does that put them in the first game or second game on Friday? (And why Fri-Sat? Sat-Sun would be so much easier to get to.)

[kingpin248]

First game Friday - 3:30 pm.



Post Edited (03-13-03 15:18)

[cbuckser]

The #1 seed plays the early game (3:30 EST).

http://hockey.ecac.com/Page_for_Men/releases/Special_Releases/2002-03/ECAC_TV_Package_Continues_With_RPI_at_Cornell

[judy]

Finish by Sat so NCAA seeding can be annnounced Sunday afternoon....?

[Beeeej]

Those guys at the ECAC really need to get their feces together, because I got my information from another page on their site - http://hockey.ecac.com/Page_for_Men/championship/quickfacts - that it made sense to get the information from at the time, and it claims the #2 vs. #3 game is the early one.

Luckily, I remember which people I've told already, so I can tell them the correct information.

And perhaps not surprisingly, the ECAC website doesn't have any "Contact Us" link, at least not one I can readily find.

Edit:  The page at http://hockey.ecac.com/Page_for_Men/aboutecac/aboutecac.html does have an e-mail link, and I've fired one away.

Beeeej



Post Edited (03-16-03 19:41)

[David Harding 72]

[q]Luckily, I remember which people I've told already, so I can tell them the correct information.[/q]

Is there any reason to trust one ECAC page over another?

[Beeeej]

No, but when USCHO, NESN, YES, and Cornell agree with the more recent ECAC page, it's a pretty strong sign.  It's just very irresponsible of the ECAC not to correct the old page (or to leave it up and prominently linked) in the first place).

Beeeej