USCHO Front Page Article on Murray

DeltaOne81 · January 17, 2003, 12:28:39 AM

Did we not have a discussion on the root of Hahvahd hatred back around the Hahvahd game time? And was the not consensus generally that we hate them because they win too much and bc they had like a 10 year winning streak against us?

Greg Berge · January 17, 2003, 12:34:28 AM

Well, the ten year drought didn't help any... :-(

rhovorka · January 17, 2003, 02:13:51 AM

Look...the Red Sox-Yankees thing doesn't work, because those two teams both have very passionate fans. Harvard does not. And each team has beat the other in the playoffs recently. (Although 2002 was the first time HU got over on CU in the postseason since 1994, while CU knocked out HU in 2001, 2000, 1997, and 1996.) Anyway, it's a poor analogy. BU-UNH is probably a better comparison to NYY-BOS. Or Minnesota-North Dakota.

jeh25 · January 17, 2003, 08:05:52 AM

5. Bill Cleary.

4. The Beer Can Incident

3. The Damn Chicken Thing

2. 10 year losing streak and going home with stinky fish

1. 2002 ECAC Tourney

Al DeFlorio · January 17, 2003, 08:42:05 AM

Um...check the year on the last one, John.

CowbellGuy · January 17, 2003, 09:12:32 AM

Greg wrote:

QuoteTo return this thread to its ostensible topic, does anybody know who the Harvard player is that Doug is dry-humping in that picture?

Aaron Kim

Al DeFlorio · January 17, 2003, 09:37:42 AM

CowbellGuy wrote:

QuoteGreg wrote:
QuoteTo return this thread to its ostensible topic, does anybody know who the Harvard player is that Doug is dry-humping in that picture?
Aaron Kim

Couldn't have picked a more appropriate victim.

Mo Kelly · January 17, 2003, 10:21:08 AM

"These days". . .Mo, let's open our eyes to reality here bud. . .you've been "around" eLynah for at best a few weeks and in that period logged a massive 20 posts. Fact is, since you started posting here you've instigated nothing but trouble. I realize your intentions are genuine but you method SUCKS! This is not a forum where people start sh#t like your 12:39 post. If you want to contribute to this board by all means, all are welcome (whether you agree with their view or not). Again, just in case you missed that. . .ALL OPINIONS ARE WELCOME! Leave the third grade crap at home and act you age.

Actually Ben the funny thing is I am only in second grade, so I guess I'm acting more than my age. I have been told I'm mature for my age before though. And in full disclosure- I've been around eLynah for more than a few weeks. I posted when I was in first grade and kindergarten under the name Mo Kelly (w/out the ') but forgot what my password was this year.

I do believe my intentions are genuine - I just tend to get a little upset when people rip on our players or bash my unbridled enthusiasm for the Big Red. Yes maybe I wear rose colored glasses but its better than having a 2 by 4 stuck up my a$$. (sorry couldn't resist)

I hope we can agree that we are all fans, and that's the common bond that should supercede all.

See you at the Frozen Four-
I remain,
Mo

jtwcornell91 · January 17, 2003, 10:22:58 AM

Maybe the lessons on the dangers of angering the Woofing Gods come later in the semester...

Ogletorp · January 17, 2003, 11:02:35 AM

It may seem that I agree with Mo a lot and yet disagree sometimes but I notice his sarcasm and see his intentions. I do remember Mo from last year posting about Steve Baby and his glowlights (not really sure what the meaning of that is) and Undy's potential, so Ben you don't have a justification there. Mo seems to be in it for the team while others think he is just trying to cause trouble. You probably need to look past his attitude (or imatureness as people have said) and try to understand that he is a true believer.
As for you Mo, I also will see you at the Frozen Four!

Best,
Ogie

p.s. I on the other hand have just started posting this year after reading for several years. Just am so excited about this year that thought it was the time to give my thoughts.

DeltaOne81 · January 17, 2003, 01:13:01 PM

Honestly Mo, your intentions may be good, but your persistence and choice of words have lead to more negitivity on eLynah than I've seen in a long time. Keep in mind that sarcasm doesn't carry very well on the internet - there's no "tone of voice" - so a jokingly sarcastic sentence can just as easily be read seriously.

Just please be more careful, and maybe consider using ;-), :-P, ::nut:: , when you're kidding around.

Also, it's one thing to say to Age, et al... "I think you're being overcritical for these reasons..."

It's another thing to pick a fight on a thread where Age hasn't said a damn thing.

I think we're all willing to give you the benefit of the doubt, but please be careful and cool it just a tad.

-Fred