First USCHO PWR of the year are up and bracketology (is that better?)

[ansky629]

And right now ECAC hockey is looking at 2 teams in the top 16, both tied at 12th, Princeton and Cornell are also in there, but it's not looking too pretty for us unless we win the conference tourney.  But then I guess we already knew that.  

First PWR on USCHO

Bracketology

[jtwcornell91]

They've been on

http://www.collegehockeynews.com/ratings/ncaapwcr.php

and

http://slack.net/~whelan/tbrw/tbrw.cgi?pwr

since December.

Also, you can put in hypothetical results and see how things change at

http://slack.net/~whelan/tbrw/tbrw.cgi?rankings.diy

[Trotsky]

Never go up against an astrophysicist when math is on the line.

[Josh '99]

[quote Trotsky]Never go up against an astrophysicist when math is on the line.[/quote]But it wasn't math on the line, nobody's debating the numbers.  Just the semantics of whether USCHO's PWR was really the "first of the year".

Never go up against a lawyer when semantics are on the line.  ::uptosomething::

[RichH]

[quote Josh '99][quote Trotsky]Never go up against an astrophysicist when math is on the line.[/quote]But it wasn't math on the line, nobody's debating the numbers.  Just the semantics of whether USCHO's PWR was really the "first of the year".

Never go up against a lawyer when semantics are on the line.  ::uptosomething::[/quote]

...and that's almost twice as many planes.

[Josh '99]

[quote RichH][quote Josh '99][quote Trotsky]Never go up against an astrophysicist when math is on the line.[/quote]But it wasn't math on the line, nobody's debating the numbers.  Just the semantics of whether USCHO's PWR was really the "first of the year".

Never go up against a lawyer when semantics are on the line.  ::uptosomething::[/quote]

...and that's almost twice as many planes.

[/quote]Heh.  Fair enough.