ELynah Forum

I look at it from a different perspective. He faces so few shots because are defence blocks the majority of the crappy ones. Our defence, like any other defence, does get beat, and does give up some high quality scoring opportunities. For the most part the shots he faces are of a higher caliber. Although he sees fewer shots, the saves he has to make have to be higher in quality. His numbers don't get padded by lots of long shots from the outside like a HE goalies. I don't think that we should have to defend him. He has the highest save percentage in the country. Thus, he stops a higher percentage of higher quality shots than ANYONE IN THE COUNTRY.

Jeffrey "Beeeej" Anbinder '94 wrote:

QuoteI was taking an enormous, stinky dump this afternoon, and I happened to think about Cornell hockey.  That definitely warrants a post on this forum.

Beeeej

Didn't your mother ever tell you not to eat sh[]t?

Age, I like the idea of a Cleary Spitoon.

like me. ::laugh::

Thanks for the comments!!!

yeah, the way i see it...

how 'bout wireless?

As far as I am concerned, if they can provide a digital audio feed for away games, then they should be able to provide a video feed.

Me too.

I think that may cost a person their job. Definitely a huge mistake.

Still, one captain in street clothes, and the other on personal recognizance.   ::nut::

What is the answer to the Field Hockey Question? It has Hockey in the name, so in a sense, they are a specific kind of hockey player. What we consider hockey players are actually ice hockey players. So I would say yes, they are hockey players. BTW, BRA, please don't tell people how to handle their polls, it is gross. ::help::

You have to analyze the sums for all the top 15 and others receiving votes to even slightly have an idea of what number of which votes we received. I am not about to even try. It is nearly impossible.

Does anyone know how all the results are changing our overall standing? ::help::