Sunday, May 19th, 2024
 
 
 
Updates automatically
Twitter Link
CHN iOS App
 
NCAA
1967 1970

ECAC
1967 1968 1969 1970 1973 1980 1986 1996 1997 2003 2005 2010

IVY
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1977 1978 1983 1984 1985 1996 1997 2002 2003 2004 2005 2012 2014

Cleary Bedpan
2002 2003 2005

Ned Harkness Cup
2003 2005 2008 2013
 
Brendon
Iles
Pokulok
Schafer
Syphilis

Cornell 67, Vermont ? 59

Posted by Swampy 
Cornell 67, Vermont ? 59
Posted by: Swampy (---.nyc.biz.rr.com)
Date: November 28, 2009 11:47PM

Whew,

The way ESPN describes it, this sounds like a lucky win. Those Vermont players must be pretty good. At least we had Morris Blakely, and we could have used Justin Milo at MSG tonight too. screwy
 
Re: Cornell 67, Vermont ? 59
Posted by: phillysportsfan (---.hsd1.nj.comcast.net)
Date: November 29, 2009 02:09AM

It was not really a lucky win, Vermont got off to a strong start and Donahue made the necessary defensive adjustments to shut them down. We finally stopped missing lay ups and Wire played a huge part with 13 rebounds since Coury got in foul trouble and Peck fouled somebody every time they put him in. Peck looks like he has a lot of potential, probably one of the more athletic guys on the team and he is not afraid to drive into the lane but he has to learn to be more disciplined.

I hope your being sarcastic about Blakely being on Cornell, because that AP story was probably one of the worst every done, look at all the mistakes.

PHILADELPHIA -- Marqus Blakely (not on Cornell) scored 21 points and grabbed seven rebounds to help Cornell defeat Vermont 67-59 on Saturday.

Trailing 32-30 at halftime, Cornell (4-2) pulled ahead 36-34 on Ryan Wittman's jump shot with 17:32 to play in the Legends Classic.

Maurice Joseph made two free throws to tie the game on the Catamounts' next possession with 16:57 left.

But the Big Red (2-4) went on a 15-6 run to take a 51-42 lead on a tip-in by Mark Coury with 11:27 to play. Cornell increased their lead to as many as 15 points, 59-45 on a free throw by Jeff Foote with 8:36 remaining.

Cornell shot 44.4 percent from the field (20 of 45), while Vermont was 29.4 percent from 3-point range (5 of 17).

Foote, Louis Dale and Wittman (on Cornell not Vermont) scored 12 points apiece for the Catamounts. Chris Wroblewski and Geoff Reeves (on Cornell not Vermont) added 11 points each and Adam Wire had 13 rebounds for Vermont.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/29/2009 02:16AM by phillysportsfan.
 
Re: Cornell 67, Vermont ? 59
Posted by: mnagowski (---.bflony.fios.verizon.net)
Date: November 29, 2009 04:37PM

Big Red ekes outs a 61-54 victory over Drexel. We were down 54-52 with less than two minutes to play.

 
___________________________
The moniker formally know as metaezra.
[www.metaezra.com]
 
Re: Cornell 67, Vermont ? 59
Posted by: Luke 05 (---.tx.res.rr.com)
Date: November 29, 2009 08:40PM

Alabama upsets #15 Michigan. Helps our RPI...
 
Re: Cornell 67, Vermont ? 59
Posted by: Swampy (---.ri.ri.cox.net)
Date: November 30, 2009 01:05AM

phillysportsfan
I hope your being sarcastic about Blakely being on Cornell, because that AP story was probably one of the worst every done, look at all the mistakes.

Yes, it was a joke, son. You're supposed to laugh. laugh (The report posted on ESPN, which I suppose was the AP report, had the players on the two teams reversed. Hence, the smiley.
 
Re: Cornell 67, Vermont ? 59
Posted by: phillysportsfan (---.cable.mindspring.com)
Date: November 30, 2009 02:04AM

Swampy
phillysportsfan
I hope your being sarcastic about Blakely being on Cornell, because that AP story was probably one of the worst every done, look at all the mistakes.

Yes, it was a joke, son. You're supposed to laugh. laugh (The report posted on ESPN, which I suppose was the AP report, had the players on the two teams reversed. Hence, the smiley.

Yeah I figured you were kidding but it was hard to tell.
 
Re: Cornell 67, Vermont ? 59
Posted by: Josh '99 (---.nyc.res.rr.com)
Date: December 01, 2009 08:18AM

mnagowski
Big Red ekes outs a 61-54 victory over Drexel. We were down 54-52 with less than two minutes to play.
So if we won all three games, does that mean we won the tournament?
 
Re: Cornell 67, Vermont ? 59
Posted by: phillysportsfan (---.cable.mindspring.com)
Date: December 01, 2009 10:32AM

I guess you could say we won the subregional tournament but the whole tournament was a joke, we should have been playing in Atlantic City.
 
Re: Cornell 67, Vermont ? 59
Posted by: ugarte (---.z75-46-65.customer.algx.net)
Date: December 01, 2009 02:21PM

phillysportsfan
I guess you could say we won the subregional tournament but the whole tournament was a joke, we should have been playing in Atlantic City.
You can't think of it that way. I don't know this for sure, but I think the tournament was designed to get every team 4 exempt out-of-conference games, not to get a "winner" in a traditional sense. Four high(ish) profile teams were preselected to host an opening round game and draw fans to AC. The rest of the teams were in it for something other than "winning a tournament."

We beat teams from the A10, MAC, America East and CAA to go with an earlier win against the SEC. That's not bad, even if the team doesn't get a banner of dubious value to go with the 4-0 record. Also, Michigan State, Florida, maybe both and possibly Rutgers would have beaten us if we did go to AC, so I have no regrets.

 
 
Re: Cornell 67, Vermont ? 59
Posted by: phillysportsfan (---.cable.mindspring.com)
Date: December 01, 2009 03:01PM

Yeah you are right it was a chance to get 4 exempt out of conference games but the whole idea of auto advancing teams regardless of whether they win is a joke. The funny part about it was that if the hockey game at MSG was not going on that weekend probably could have gotten more Cornell fans to go to AC than UMass since I would bet there are many more Cornell alumni around Philly than UMass alumni.
 
Re: Cornell 67, Vermont ? 59
Posted by: Jordan 04 (155.72.24.---)
Date: December 01, 2009 04:24PM

phillysportsfan
We should have been playing in Atlantic City.

Hopefully that is a seldom-repeated phrase on eLynah over the next few years.
 

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login