Tuesday, May 14th, 2024
 
 
 
Updates automatically
Twitter Link
CHN iOS App
 
NCAA
1967 1970

ECAC
1967 1968 1969 1970 1973 1980 1986 1996 1997 2003 2005 2010

IVY
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1977 1978 1983 1984 1985 1996 1997 2002 2003 2004 2005 2012 2014

Cleary Jell-O Mold
2002 2003 2005

Ned Harkness Cup
2003 2005 2008 2013
 
Brendon
Iles
Pokulok
Schafer
Syphilis

Conference Strengths

Posted by Scersk '97 
Conference Strengths
Posted by: Scersk '97 (---.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net)
Date: December 18, 2005 02:52AM

On inspecting KRACH for a bit, the average* KRACH rating shows:

WCHA ~ CCHA > HE ~ ECAC

and median:

CCHA ~ WCHA ~ HE >> ECAC

by KRACH rank, it's:

CCHA > WCHA > HE > ECAC

and by KRACH median rank, it's:

CCHA > WCHA > HE > ECAC

The telling problem is that, while the bottoms of the four leagues are pretty equal in rating (Michigan Tech 43.78 ~ Princeton 42.42), the split happens higher in the ECAC than in the other leagues. The big jump is between the 5th and 6th ranked teams in the ECAC rather than the jump between 5/6 in the WCHA and Hockey (L)East and 9/10 in the CCHA. This of course, accounts for the wild difference between averages and medians.

This makes empirical sense. The ECAC holds the advantage over HE, inter-conference, which holds the advantage over the WCHA, which leads the "Big 4" winning percentage race barely over the CCHA. The WCHA, HE, and the ECAC are two-part conferences this year and the tops of those conferences are competitive with the tops of the other conferences. The CCHA is competitive top to bottom. (SLU had their trouble with BG last weekend.)

Needless to say, had Vermont stayed in the ECAC this year, the league would have been very strong indeed. As it is, we're pretty strong. There are 5 strong teams in the ECAC, 6 in HE, 5 in the WCHA, and 9 in the CCHA. Wisconsin, Miami, and Michigan are a step above the rest right now, but that probably won't last long. I think that, should Cornell actually pull it together for the 2nd half, relative parity between leagues and teams is a good omen for us.

(* I know average KRACH rating is a funny number, since KRACH is about ratios and such, but I don't feel like doing the math. Disregard the rating talk if you like; however, KRACH looks pretty smooth and linear between 58th and 4th, so I think the ranking analysis is valid.)

Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 12/18/2005 03:11AM by Scersk '97.
 
Re: Conference Strengths
Posted by: jtwcornell91 (---.rgv.res.rr.com)
Date: December 18, 2005 11:36AM

What you probably want to do to compare conferences is calculate the overall expected winning percentage if every team in the ECAC played every team in HE the same number of times. I used to have a script that did that, but I'm too busy packing up and moving back to New Orleans to look for/kick-start it today.


 
___________________________
JTW

Enjoy the latest hockey geek tools at [www.elynah.com]
 
Re: Conference Strengths
Posted by: DeltaOne81 (---.mtholyoke.edu)
Date: December 18, 2005 12:04PM

Glad to hear it JTW :-)
 

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login