Monday, May 13th, 2024
 
 
 
Updates automatically
Twitter Link
CHN iOS App
 
NCAA
1967 1970

ECAC
1967 1968 1969 1970 1973 1980 1986 1996 1997 2003 2005 2010

IVY
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1977 1978 1983 1984 1985 1996 1997 2002 2003 2004 2005 2012 2014

Cleary Bedpan
2002 2003 2005

Ned Harkness Cup
2003 2005 2008 2013
 
Brendon
Iles
Pokulok
Schafer
Syphilis

SLU @ UVM Final

Posted by Scersk '97 
SLU @ UVM Final
Posted by: Scersk '97 (---.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net)
Date: December 17, 2005 09:12PM

SLU 2
Vermont 1

Hockey Least! Hockey Least!
 
Re: SLU @ UVM Final
Posted by: Josh '99 (---.nyc.res.rr.com)
Date: December 18, 2005 01:52AM

So, as I was saying. Vemont? Not that good.
 
Re: SLU @ UVM Final
Posted by: abmarks (---.bos.east.verizon.net)
Date: December 18, 2005 02:08AM

[Q]jmh30 Wrote:

So, as I was saying. Vemont? Not that good.[/q]

Or maybe St. Lawrence will be the real deal. They've only split with Wisconsin, beat Miami and now VT, which go 1,2,3 in the poll. Yep they dropped one to RIT, but I'll look past that...
 
Re: SLU @ UVM Final
Posted by: evilnaturedrobot (---.dyn.optonline.net)
Date: December 18, 2005 02:30AM

I believe they tied miami (on the road though.)
 
Re: SLU @ UVM Final
Posted by: Scersk '97 (---.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net)
Date: December 18, 2005 02:55AM

I was thinking...

Vermont : Colgate :: Hockey East : ECAC(HL), according to KRACH, but this year it certainly looks like top of HE = top of ECAC(HL), which is certainly better than usual. Overall, it certainly seems like:

CCHA > WCHA > ECAC > HE, where the differences are very small. I think that's good for us.

**********

Which turns out not to be born out by any facts:

[elf.elynah.com]
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12/18/2005 02:59AM by Scersk '97.
 
Re: SLU @ UVM Final
Posted by: Pete Godenschwager (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: December 18, 2005 10:53AM

[Q]Yep they dropped one to RIT, but I'll look past that...[/Q]

Especially since they outshot RIT by something like 60-15 in that one
 
Re: SLU @ UVM Final
Posted by: DeltaOne81 (---.mtholyoke.edu)
Date: December 18, 2005 12:03PM

[Q]jmh30 Wrote:

So, as I was saying. Vemont? Not that good.[/q]

Well, that may be a bit strong. They're good. They'd probably be competing for top 4 in the ECAC again. But I agree that having them so high is the polls is just conference bias. If the same team were in the ECAC they'd be 10-15 like the rest of us.
 
Re: SLU @ UVM Final
Posted by: SLU65 (---.rochester.res.rr.com)
Date: December 18, 2005 06:00PM

This is a VERY exciting SLU squad. Equal to, if not better than ,the Ron Mason led teams of the early 60's and even the teams of the late !980's.

With the return of their #1 defensemen and goalie you should see an improvement in goals allowed . Pesony GA is high, in part, due to frosh defenders.

Their freshman defenseman Generous is as good as it gets and freshman DeVirgilio makes moves that belie his first year status

Marsh led teams are historically stronger post Xmas. Assuming that they avoid the injury bug - 6 players have been out at one time - this team is a NCAA contender.

Unfortunately they have a tendency to do well against the biggies (UVM, Miami, Wisconsin) and tend to slump a bit when they face few shots - e.g., RIT where the true count was in excess of 70 SOGs vs 15 for Tech.
 

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login