Regionals and NCAA Selection
Posted by Josh '99
Regionals and NCAA Selection
Posted by: Josh '99 (207.10.33.---)
Date: June 27, 2002 03:13PM
[www1.ncaa.org]
Regionals for 2002-03 will be in Worcester, Providence, Ann Arbor, Minneapolis.
TUC will be re-defined to RPI >= 0.500 from win% >= 0.500.
RPI will be 25-50-25 instead of 35-50-15.
L16 will be eliminated as a selection criterion.
Sorry if some of this is repeat information, I'm just summarizing the linked article. The elimination of L16 caught me by surprise; had there been any speculation about that before?
Regionals for 2002-03 will be in Worcester, Providence, Ann Arbor, Minneapolis.
TUC will be re-defined to RPI >= 0.500 from win% >= 0.500.
RPI will be 25-50-25 instead of 35-50-15.
L16 will be eliminated as a selection criterion.
Sorry if some of this is repeat information, I'm just summarizing the linked article. The elimination of L16 caught me by surprise; had there been any speculation about that before?
___________________________
"They do all kind of just blend together into one giant dildo."
-Ben Rocky 04
"They do all kind of just blend together into one giant dildo."
-Ben Rocky 04
Re: Regionals and NCAA Selection
Posted by: Al DeFlorio (---)
Date: June 27, 2002 04:49PM
I suspect dropping the L16 is an attempt to lessen the effect of a Mercyhurst playing (and perhaps winning) its last 16 games against weak MAAC opponents. Should a 16-0 Mercyhurst record against MAAC teams give them an advantage over a Hockey East or CCHA school that finishes out something like 14-2?
Last 16
Posted by: jtwcornell91 (---)
Date: June 27, 2002 06:04PM
Right, last 16 was the one selection criterion which was completely ignorant of strength of schedule, so rather than try to adjust it for SOS, they just dropped it (in the process also making RPI more important).
Re: Regionals and NCAA Selection
Posted by: Greg Berge (---)
Date: June 27, 2002 08:13PM
So, the upshot is schedule strength is now far more important than before.
The followig teams qualified as TUC this year but would not have with this criteria:
+ Harvard
+ Dartmouth
+ Sacred Heart
+ Holy Cross
See a pattern?
The followig teams qualified as TUC this year but would not have with this criteria:
+ Harvard
+ Dartmouth
+ Sacred Heart
+ Holy Cross
See a pattern?
Re: Regionals and NCAA Selection
Posted by: ursusminor (---)
Date: June 28, 2002 04:21AM
Wouldn't Harvard still have been a TUC because they won the ECAC championship?
Re: Last 16
Posted by: Josh '99 (207.10.33.---)
Date: June 28, 2002 07:59AM
John T. Whelan '91 wrote:
Seems like if you want to interpret it this way, its intent is to prevent teams from the ECAC, MAAC, and CHA from getting at-large bids. Out of curiosity, if anyone can calculate this without too much trouble, would we have gotten one last year without L16 as a criterion?
Right, last 16 was the one selection criterion which was completely ignorant of strength of schedule, so rather than try to adjust it for SOS, they just dropped it (in the process also making RPI more important).
Recalculation
Posted by: jtwcornell91 (---)
Date: June 28, 2002 08:20AM
I was planning to do a re-calculation of last year's PWCs with the new selection criteria, but it won't be for at least a week, since I have to do little things like move all my stuff to New Orleans in the meantime.
Re: Regionals and NCAA Selection
Posted by: jtwcornell91 (---)
Date: June 28, 2002 08:22AM
ursaminor wrote:
Yes, assuming they haven't changed that rule.
Wouldn't Harvard would still have been a TUC because they won the ECAC championship?
Re: Regionals and NCAA Selection
Posted by: Greg Berge (---)
Date: June 28, 2002 08:04PM
I even thought about amending that after I reread it but figured (1) wasn't sure and (2) ah, save the keystrokes...
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.