Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by ganderson
Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: ganderson (---.cluster.yale.edu)
Date: March 05, 2005 06:35PM
So there's no Gametracker for any of the WCHA games, or for half the Hockey East, so if anyone happens to be trolling USCHO score threads, I'd love the updates.
And we're "routing" for Onion tonight right? (preferably in the 22nd OT
(trolling? Who talks like that?)
And we're "routing" for Onion tonight right? (preferably in the 22nd OT
(trolling? Who talks like that?)
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: Robb (---.169.137.235.ts46v-07.otnc1.ftwrth.tx.charter.co)
Date: March 05, 2005 06:54PM
only 22 overtimes? Cmon - dream a litte!
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: ganderson (---.cluster.yale.edu)
Date: March 05, 2005 07:03PM
With Quinnipiac's 5-1 score over AIC, (only 7 min left) they are close to tying up the#1 seed in their tournament. Good to see our soon to be ECAC bretheren tearing up their old conference.
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: ganderson (---.cluster.yale.edu)
Date: March 05, 2005 07:04PM
After showing Dartmouth up 2-0 over yale, Gametracker seems to have changed their minds, and now Yale is up 1-0 :S
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/05/2005 07:08PM by ganderson.
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: ganderson (---.cluster.yale.edu)
Date: March 05, 2005 07:09PM
Dartmouth ties it 1-1 against yale.
Brown up 1-0 over RIP
Brown up 1-0 over RIP
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: ganderson (---.cluster.yale.edu)
Date: March 05, 2005 07:17PM
RIP ties brown 1-1 halfway through 1st.
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: Avash (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: March 05, 2005 07:21PM
Meech scores. 2-1 Brown now.
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: DeltaOne81 (---.bos.east.verizon.net)
Date: March 05, 2005 07:25PM
BU 1, UNH 0
Minn 1, MTU 0
Minn 1, MTU 0
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: ganderson (---.cluster.yale.edu)
Date: March 05, 2005 07:26PM
Looks like they forgot to put their goalies in again tonight.
And in other conferences, NMU up 1-0 over LSSU, and BU up 1-0 over New Hampshire.
And in other conferences, NMU up 1-0 over LSSU, and BU up 1-0 over New Hampshire.
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: DeltaOne81 (---.bos.east.verizon.net)
Date: March 05, 2005 07:26PM
Make that 2-0 for BU on top of UNH
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: ganderson (---.cluster.yale.edu)
Date: March 05, 2005 07:41PM
ME over BC 1-0
Providence up 1-0 over UML
MSU up 1-0 over Notre Dame
Providence up 1-0 over UML
MSU up 1-0 over Notre Dame
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: ganderson (---.cluster.yale.edu)
Date: March 05, 2005 07:43PM
NMU now tied w/ LSSU at 1 each.
Is this more or less annoying than having one post with all the scores and updating it?
Is this more or less annoying than having one post with all the scores and updating it?
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/05/2005 07:44PM by ganderson.
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: kaaren (---.proxy.aol.com)
Date: March 05, 2005 07:46PM
Less annoying this way. Thanks for the updates.
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: ganderson (---.cluster.yale.edu)
Date: March 05, 2005 07:47PM
Michigan up 1-0 over Bowling Green.
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: ganderson (---.cluster.yale.edu)
Date: March 05, 2005 07:57PM
Yale up 2-1 over Dartmouth. Guess the Green got a little too comfortable after last night...
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: ganderson (---.cluster.yale.edu)
Date: March 05, 2005 07:59PM
NMU up 2-1 over LSSU
And closer to home, SLU(t) pulls ahead of Princeton 1-0
And closer to home, SLU(t) pulls ahead of Princeton 1-0
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: ganderson (---.cluster.yale.edu)
Date: March 05, 2005 08:01PM
They must have heard me taunting them...
Dartmouth ties Yale at 2 in the 2nd.
Dartmouth ties Yale at 2 in the 2nd.
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: ganderson (---.cluster.yale.edu)
Date: March 05, 2005 08:06PM
Providence up 2-0 over UML
Bowling green ties Michigan at 1 (1st)
Bowling green ties Michigan at 1 (1st)
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: ganderson (---.cluster.yale.edu)
Date: March 05, 2005 08:07PM
Providence 2-1 over UML
NMU 3-1 over LSSU
NMU 3-1 over LSSU
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: ganderson (---.cluster.yale.edu)
Date: March 05, 2005 08:12PM
NMU 3 - LSSU 2 (2nd)
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: DeltaOne81 (---.bos.east.verizon.net)
Date: March 05, 2005 08:19PM
Minn 3-0, I'm giving up on that for well. Oh well on the Minn from for the last 2 weekends.
3-0 BU
3-0 BU
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: DeltaOne81 (---.bos.east.verizon.net)
Date: March 05, 2005 08:20PM
Meanwhile, Yale up on Dartmouth 3-2
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: Avash (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: March 05, 2005 08:28PM
End of the second period:
Princeton 0 SLU 1
Clarkson 1 Union 0
Yale 3 Dartmouth 2 (shots on goal: DC 40 - YU 15)
Princeton 0 SLU 1
Clarkson 1 Union 0
Yale 3 Dartmouth 2 (shots on goal: DC 40 - YU 15)
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: ganderson (---.cluster.yale.edu)
Date: March 05, 2005 08:29PM
UNH goal, making it BU3-UNH1
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: ganderson (---.cluster.yale.edu)
Date: March 05, 2005 08:31PM
I can only imagine what the Dartmouth players are hearing in the locker room
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: ganderson (---.cluster.yale.edu)
Date: March 05, 2005 08:33PM
MSU 2 - Notre Dame 1
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: ganderson (---.cluster.yale.edu)
Date: March 05, 2005 08:39PM
Bowling Green 1 Michigan 2 (2nd)
Miami 1 tOSU 0
BU 3 UNH 2
Miami 1 tOSU 0
BU 3 UNH 2
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: ganderson (---.cluster.yale.edu)
Date: March 05, 2005 08:44PM
SLU 2 - Princeton 0
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: ganderson (---.cluster.yale.edu)
Date: March 05, 2005 08:52PM
RIP 3 - Brown 2 (GRRRRR....)
Michigan 3 - Bowling Green 1
Michigan 3 - Bowling Green 1
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: DeltaOne81 (---.bos.east.verizon.net)
Date: March 05, 2005 08:54PM
Now 3-3 at Brown
2-1 at SLU
2-1 at SLU
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: Jacob '06 (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: March 05, 2005 08:59PM
Yale 4- Dartmouth 2
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: JDeafv (---.howard01.md.comcast.net)
Date: March 05, 2005 08:59PM
Union ties it with 8 mins left in the 3rd.
Audio available on Clarkson web.
Audio available on Clarkson web.
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: ganderson (---.cluster.yale.edu)
Date: March 05, 2005 09:00PM
Yale 4- Darmouth 2
The shots however are 56-23 the other way. Damn Yacey is a sieve....
The shots however are 56-23 the other way. Damn Yacey is a sieve....
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: KP '06 (---.client.comcast.net)
Date: March 05, 2005 09:01PM
[Q]Jacob '06 Wrote:
Yale 4- Dartmouth 2[/q]
Shots 57-23 for the Green.
Yacey not having a good night, Gartner having a great one.
Edit: Beaten to the punch.
Yale 4- Dartmouth 2[/q]
Shots 57-23 for the Green.
Yacey not having a good night, Gartner having a great one.
Edit: Beaten to the punch.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/05/2005 09:02PM by KP '06.
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: ganderson (---.cluster.yale.edu)
Date: March 05, 2005 09:02PM
Union ties clarkson at 1
Princeton ties SLU at 2.
Welcome to hockey's Twilight Zone.
Princeton ties SLU at 2.
Welcome to hockey's Twilight Zone.
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: Jacob '06 (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: March 05, 2005 09:02PM
Dartmouth gets one back....4-3 yale
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: DeltaOne81 (---.bos.east.verizon.net)
Date: March 05, 2005 09:03PM
Princeton ties up SLU at 2 - SLU still dominating on the shots
1-0 Wisconsin (trying to stay ahead of Minn in the standings)
Dartmouth brings it back within 1 - 4-3 Yale
1-0 Wisconsin (trying to stay ahead of Minn in the standings)
Dartmouth brings it back within 1 - 4-3 Yale
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/05/2005 09:04PM by DeltaOne81.
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: judy (---.phil.east.verizon.net)
Date: March 05, 2005 09:05PM
so what time are Sunday games should anyone go to game 3? They all starting at 7?
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: ganderson (---.cluster.yale.edu)
Date: March 05, 2005 09:06PM
RIP and Brown tied at 3.
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: Jacob '06 (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: March 05, 2005 09:06PM
Dartmouth ties it up
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: ganderson (---.cluster.yale.edu)
Date: March 05, 2005 09:08PM
All 4 ECAC games tied late in the 3rd.
Also, Bowling green ties Michigan at 3
Also, Bowling green ties Michigan at 3
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: DeltaOne81 (---.bos.east.verizon.net)
Date: March 05, 2005 09:08PM
and SLU takes the lead with under 2 minutes to go
Yes, I believe all the Sunday games are 7 as well
Yes, I believe all the Sunday games are 7 as well
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: KP '06 (---.client.comcast.net)
Date: March 05, 2005 09:11PM
Dartmouth now with as many shots in the 3rd as Yale has all game long (24).
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: JDeafv (---.howard01.md.comcast.net)
Date: March 05, 2005 09:13PM
Icing on clarkson with 0.7 secs left in regulation ... OT here we come?
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: JDeafv (---.howard01.md.comcast.net)
Date: March 05, 2005 09:14PM
OT, again.
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: KP '06 (---.client.comcast.net)
Date: March 05, 2005 09:14PM
RPI-Brown and Clarkson-U going to OT. Keep tiring each other out!
Edit: And Dartmouth-Yale.
Edit: And Dartmouth-Yale.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/05/2005 09:15PM by KP '06.
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: ganderson (---.cluster.yale.edu)
Date: March 05, 2005 09:15PM
Providence and UML tied at 2.
Must be something in the air tonight.
Maine 2-0 over BC
Must be something in the air tonight.
Maine 2-0 over BC
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: DeltaOne81 (---.bos.east.verizon.net)
Date: March 05, 2005 09:16PM
Goal Maine 2-0 in the third
Wisc, UMD tied at 1, mid 2nd
still BU 3, UNH 2 - under 9 minutes left
SLU wins 4-2 - Princeton is done for the year
Dartmouth/Yale going to OT at 4 a piece
Brown/RPI net 3 each as they head to the extra session
Union/Clarkson knotted at one after regulation
< looking to explain the exciting variety of tie situations we have right now >
Wisc, UMD tied at 1, mid 2nd
still BU 3, UNH 2 - under 9 minutes left
SLU wins 4-2 - Princeton is done for the year
Dartmouth/Yale going to OT at 4 a piece
Brown/RPI net 3 each as they head to the extra session
Union/Clarkson knotted at one after regulation
< looking to explain the exciting variety of tie situations we have right now >
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/05/2005 09:16PM by DeltaOne81.
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: ganderson (---.cluster.yale.edu)
Date: March 05, 2005 09:17PM
SLU up 4-2
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: oceanst41 (---.housing.hawaii.edu)
Date: March 05, 2005 09:19PM
gotta love the ECAC - three games with 7 goals last night then three games with OT tonight
not to mention 56 shots by SLU and 63 by the green(before OT)!!
not to mention 56 shots by SLU and 63 by the green(before OT)!!
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: ganderson (---.cluster.yale.edu)
Date: March 05, 2005 09:20PM
Shots in DMouth - Yale is 64-24
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: ganderson (---.cluster.yale.edu)
Date: March 05, 2005 09:26PM
Michigan up 4-3 over Bowling Green end of the 2nd.
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: ganderson (---.cluster.yale.edu)
Date: March 05, 2005 09:31PM
Brown wins!!!
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: Jacob '06 (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: March 05, 2005 09:31PM
Yale wins early in OT
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: DeltaOne81 (---.bos.east.verizon.net)
Date: March 05, 2005 09:34PM
Yale wins
Brown wins
BU wins 3-2
Brown wins
BU wins 3-2
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: KP '06 (---.client.comcast.net)
Date: March 05, 2005 09:38PM
BC scores with :17 left in the 3rd, now tied with Maine 2-2.
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: ganderson (---.cluster.yale.edu)
Date: March 05, 2005 09:39PM
BC ties Maine and takes it into OT.
I don't think I'm enjoying this.
I don't think I'm enjoying this.
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: ganderson (---.cluster.yale.edu)
Date: March 05, 2005 09:42PM
Michigan up 5-3 over Bowling Green (3rd)
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: Trotsky (---.frdrmd.adelphia.net)
Date: March 05, 2005 09:42PM
Results so far:
First Round
#5 Dartmouth tied with #12 Yale, 7-2, 4-5 (ot), deciding game Sunday
#6 Brown defeats #11 RPI, 7-4, 4-3 (ot)
#7 St. Lawrence defeats #10 Princeton, 7-0, 4-2
#9 Clarkson leads #8 Union, 1-0 (ot), second game in overtime
First Round
#5 Dartmouth tied with #12 Yale, 7-2, 4-5 (ot), deciding game Sunday
#6 Brown defeats #11 RPI, 7-4, 4-3 (ot)
#7 St. Lawrence defeats #10 Princeton, 7-0, 4-2
#9 Clarkson leads #8 Union, 1-0 (ot), second game in overtime
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: French Rage (---.Stanford.EDU)
Date: March 05, 2005 09:45PM
Union wins, good.
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: French Rage (---.Stanford.EDU)
Date: March 05, 2005 09:45PM
First Union playoff win in 15 games.
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: Trotsky (---.frdrmd.adelphia.net)
Date: March 05, 2005 09:45PM
Make that:
First Round
#5 Dartmouth tied with #12 Yale, 7-2, 4-5 (ot), final game Sunday
#6 Brown defeats #11 RPI, 7-4, 4-3 (ot)
#7 St. Lawrence defeats #10 Princeton, 7-0, 4-2
#8 Union tied with #9 Clarkson 0-1 (ot), 2-1 (ot), final game Sunday
First Round
#5 Dartmouth tied with #12 Yale, 7-2, 4-5 (ot), final game Sunday
#6 Brown defeats #11 RPI, 7-4, 4-3 (ot)
#7 St. Lawrence defeats #10 Princeton, 7-0, 4-2
#8 Union tied with #9 Clarkson 0-1 (ot), 2-1 (ot), final game Sunday
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: DeltaOne81 (---.bos.east.verizon.net)
Date: March 05, 2005 09:50PM
Copying my post from USCHO:
Damn it, French. Why'd you have to go and pull up the audio?
I got on the audio and last night and the game ended a minute later. You do the same tonight and it ends. If Cornell fans could just keep their damn computers off the Clarkson feed, the games would never end and the teams would be too worn down to make it to Ithaca next week.
IAYF, IAYF
Meanwhile, we could still end up playing Yale, though I hope not for Dartmouth's sake.
Damn it, French. Why'd you have to go and pull up the audio?
I got on the audio and last night and the game ended a minute later. You do the same tonight and it ends. If Cornell fans could just keep their damn computers off the Clarkson feed, the games would never end and the teams would be too worn down to make it to Ithaca next week.
IAYF, IAYF
Meanwhile, we could still end up playing Yale, though I hope not for Dartmouth's sake.
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: Josh '99 (---.nyc.rr.com)
Date: March 05, 2005 09:54PM
Maine is freaking useless.
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: ganderson (---.cluster.yale.edu)
Date: March 05, 2005 09:54PM
2-2 final Maine BC
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: Trotsky (---.frdrmd.adelphia.net)
Date: March 05, 2005 09:55PM
BC ties Maine, final
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: TCHL8842 (---.resnet.cornell.edu)
Date: March 05, 2005 10:04PM
Delta, I don't know why you want Dartmouth to win. Who would you rather play next series Yale or (Union-Clarkson). I krnow I would definitely want Yale. The only reason why you would want Dartmouth to win is on the hope 3 Ivies will make the tourney, which they still have to get by Vermont and maybe more to make it.
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: Dart~Ben (66.240.10.---)
Date: March 05, 2005 10:06PM
BTW, not that this prediction was a good thing, but since you all have been ripping off my posts anyway...
[q]
Prediction time:
OT will end in 5 minutes. Dartmouth will control the play. It's just a matter of whether or not they'll get one by Gardner before Yale gets to 3 SOG for the period.[/q]
So of course, Yale scored on their 3rd SOG of OT, and while play was probably a little more even for those 2:30 minutes than I expected, it's probably fair to say that Dartmouth still controlled the play - the GWG was a half dump-in as both teams were changing lines. Yacey had a pretty bad night. From the 4 goals I saw that he let in, it was as weak as I've seen him play all year.
[q]
Prediction time:
OT will end in 5 minutes. Dartmouth will control the play. It's just a matter of whether or not they'll get one by Gardner before Yale gets to 3 SOG for the period.[/q]
So of course, Yale scored on their 3rd SOG of OT, and while play was probably a little more even for those 2:30 minutes than I expected, it's probably fair to say that Dartmouth still controlled the play - the GWG was a half dump-in as both teams were changing lines. Yacey had a pretty bad night. From the 4 goals I saw that he let in, it was as weak as I've seen him play all year.
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: Trotsky (---.frdrmd.adelphia.net)
Date: March 05, 2005 10:08PM
[Q]TCHL8842 Wrote:
Delta, I don't know why you want Dartmouth to win. Who would you rather play next series Yale or (Union-Clarkson). I krnow I would definitely want Yale.[/q]
Altnough Yale would be (presumably) easier, they would also be very bad for Cornell's RPI, wouldn't they?
Delta, I don't know why you want Dartmouth to win. Who would you rather play next series Yale or (Union-Clarkson). I krnow I would definitely want Yale.[/q]
Altnough Yale would be (presumably) easier, they would also be very bad for Cornell's RPI, wouldn't they?
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: RichH (---.stny.res.rr.com)
Date: March 05, 2005 10:11PM
[Q]Trotsky Wrote:
TCHL8842 Wrote:
Delta, I don't know why you want Dartmouth to win. Who would you rather play next series Yale or (Union-Clarkson). I krnow I would definitely want Yale.[/Q]
Altnough Yale would be (presumably) easier, they would also be very bad for Cornell's RPI, wouldn't they?
[/q]
Last time, and repeat after me. You can no longer hurt your RPI by beating a poor team in the playoffs. If we lose, we deserve the hit in RPI anyway.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/05/2005 10:12PM by RichH.
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: TCHL8842 (---.resnet.cornell.edu)
Date: March 05, 2005 10:12PM
negative RPI is removed in the playoffs so no, it is all dependent on how others teams do.
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: TCHL8842 (---.resnet.cornell.edu)
Date: March 05, 2005 10:18PM
Right now, we have dropped down to number 6 in the PWR. Michigan's win jumped them over Minnesota and us into 4. Even thought the rest of the games are not in yet, I am pretty confident that we are going to stay in this position. We are still in the #2 band, and at 6 we are more likely to be out east then 5. For a number one seed, we will need to win out, and get lucky. So number 2 seed is what I am rooting for, and hopefully then we get a good draw.
Edit: This was done with 3-2-1 bonus, else we are 5, since Miami(OH) is right on the bubble of being a TUC.
Edit: This was done with 3-2-1 bonus, else we are 5, since Miami(OH) is right on the bubble of being a TUC.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/05/2005 10:21PM by TCHL8842.
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: DeltaOne81 (---.bos.east.verizon.net)
Date: March 05, 2005 10:57PM
It works out pretty the same with bonsuses of 0/0/0, 3/2/1, or 5/3/1
The best new is that Minn trails Mich by 2 comparisons - mainly Minn vs. Mich and Minn vs. BU - both of which Minn loses. So Minn would have to take both those comparisons back to be a #1. And even if they did, which with their sucky play is less than like, we would still have to take the Mich (or another) one back to get stuck in Minnesota.
So we're in fairly good position now to end up east, but lets give it another week before I/we start trying to rattle off all the possibilities
Also cool news: with 0/0/0 and 3/2/1 bonus, we end up in a likely regional of BC/Cornell/BU/NMU in Worcester (not sure if swaps for other regions would change this at all, just did our regions)
And while playing Yale couldn't hurt our RPI, it would keep it the same, while beating another team would raise it.
However, I'm more concerned at this point about Dartmouth - I'd love to see 3 ECAC teams there - and they are twelfth at the moment. Sure, I'd take Yale, but if they can beat Dartmouth, they're on a role. I'm not too much more thrilled about a hot Yale vs. a tired Union/Clarkson. We better be able to beat any of them if all this caring about NCAA seeding means anything.
The best new is that Minn trails Mich by 2 comparisons - mainly Minn vs. Mich and Minn vs. BU - both of which Minn loses. So Minn would have to take both those comparisons back to be a #1. And even if they did, which with their sucky play is less than like, we would still have to take the Mich (or another) one back to get stuck in Minnesota.
So we're in fairly good position now to end up east, but lets give it another week before I/we start trying to rattle off all the possibilities
Also cool news: with 0/0/0 and 3/2/1 bonus, we end up in a likely regional of BC/Cornell/BU/NMU in Worcester (not sure if swaps for other regions would change this at all, just did our regions)
And while playing Yale couldn't hurt our RPI, it would keep it the same, while beating another team would raise it.
However, I'm more concerned at this point about Dartmouth - I'd love to see 3 ECAC teams there - and they are twelfth at the moment. Sure, I'd take Yale, but if they can beat Dartmouth, they're on a role. I'm not too much more thrilled about a hot Yale vs. a tired Union/Clarkson. We better be able to beat any of them if all this caring about NCAA seeding means anything.
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: adamw (209.71.42.---)
Date: March 05, 2005 11:02PM
Never mind 3 ECAC teams (not since 1998), but it's never happened that three Ivy League teams made the NCAAs in the same season. Root for Dartmouth.
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: Jim Hyla (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: March 05, 2005 11:17PM
[Q]adamw Wrote: Never mind 3 ECAC teams (not since 1998), but it's never happened that three Ivy League teams made the NCAAs in the same season. Root for Dartmouth.[/q]Disagree ,I'm rooting, or routing, for Yale and CLK. I'd like nothing better, well maybe something better ,than to beat that great Coach Taylor and have CLK rough up you know who.
___________________________
"Cornell Fans Made the Timbers Tremble", Boston Globe, March/1970
Cornell lawyers stopped the candy throwing. Jan/2005
"Cornell Fans Made the Timbers Tremble", Boston Globe, March/1970
Cornell lawyers stopped the candy throwing. Jan/2005
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: Avash (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: March 06, 2005 01:04AM
Not that it really matters, but the scores from the top 15 this week:
* Has won only 1 of its last 9 games.
Team (First Place) Record Pts Last Week 1 Colorado College (12) 25-6-3 556 2 W, L (Denver) 2 Cornell (21) 22-4-3 553 2 idle 3 Denver (4) 23-8-2 523 1 L, W (Colorado Collge) 4 Michigan (3) 24-7-3 488 4 W, W (Bowling Green) 5 Boston College 20-6-6 470 5 W, T (Maine) 6 Wisconsin* 21-10-3 339 6 T, L (Minnesota-Duluth) 7 New Hampshire 22-8-4 334 7 T, L (Boston University) 8 Ohio State 23-8-3 319 8 W, T (Miami) 9 Minnesota 22-12-1 274 12 W, W (Michigan Tech) 10 Boston University 20-11-3 212 9 T, W (New Hampshire) 11 Harvard 18-8-3 186 11 idle 12 Maine 18-10-6 171 14 L, T (Boston College) 13 Mass.-Lowell 19-9-4 117 10 W, L (Merrimack, Providence) 14 Northern Michigan 18-9-7 91 15 W, W (Lake Superior) 15 Dartmouth 17-10-2 55 NR W, L, ? (Yale)
* Has won only 1 of its last 9 games.
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 03/06/2005 01:05AM by Avash '05.
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: Pace (209.2.88.---)
Date: March 06, 2005 01:59AM
[Q]Jim Hyla Wrote:
adamw Wrote: Never mind 3 ECAC teams (not since 1998), but it's never happened that three Ivy League teams made the NCAAs in the same season. Root for Dartmouth.[/Q]
Disagree ,I'm rooting, or routing, for Yale and CLK. I'd like nothing better, well maybe something better ,than to beat that great Coach Taylor and have CLK rough up you know who.[/q]
Agreed. Absolutely rooting for Yale. I'd like to get a crappy team come here off a tough weekend. I'd like our guys to have as easy a time as possible and save their energy for the semis. Plus another shutout or two would be nice.
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: calgARI '07 (205.232.75.---)
Date: March 06, 2005 02:28AM
If I could choose any team, it would be Clarkson for sure. I'm tired of easy opponents and I don't think they're helping the team. Clarkson would battle hard and Cornell obviously has huge incentive to bring their very best against them. It would be far more beneficial in the long run for Cornell to play a Clarkson or Union than a Yale.
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: Trotsky (---.frdrmd.adelphia.net)
Date: March 06, 2005 08:47AM
The team also has a bone to pick with Clarkson.
But one thing about Yale coming would be that then Vermont would get an easier opponent as well in their QF. So which would you rather have?:
Cornell v Yale
Harvard v SLU
Colgate v Brown
Vermont v Clunion
or
Cornell v Clunion
Harvard v SLU
Colgate v Brown
Vermont v Dartmouth
Since there are positive/negative points for each, this is a case of reaching into the Coach's Bag O' Cliches: "we don't care who we play. All of our league opponents are dangerous, well-coached teams. We need to take care of our own business and not worry about watching the scoreboard, and the good Lord willing, things will work out."
But one thing about Yale coming would be that then Vermont would get an easier opponent as well in their QF. So which would you rather have?:
Cornell v Yale
Harvard v SLU
Colgate v Brown
Vermont v Clunion
or
Cornell v Clunion
Harvard v SLU
Colgate v Brown
Vermont v Dartmouth
Since there are positive/negative points for each, this is a case of reaching into the Coach's Bag O' Cliches: "we don't care who we play. All of our league opponents are dangerous, well-coached teams. We need to take care of our own business and not worry about watching the scoreboard, and the good Lord willing, things will work out."
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: Al DeFlorio (---.ne.client2.attbi.com)
Date: March 06, 2005 09:12AM
[Q]Trotsky Wrote:
The team also has a bone to pick with Clarkson.
But one thing about Yale coming would be that then Vermont would get an easier opponent as well in their QF. So which would you rather have?:
Cornell v Yale
Harvard v SLU
Colgate v Brown
Vermont v Clunion
or
Cornell v Clunion
Harvard v SLU
Colgate v Brown
Vermont v Dartmouth
Since there are positive/negative points for each, this is a case of reaching into the Coach's Bag O' Cliches: "we don't care who we play. All of our league opponents are dangerous, well-coached teams. We need to take care of our own business and not worry about watching the scoreboard, and the good Lord willing, things will work out."[/q]
I believe the two most dangerous teams for us are Harvard and Dartmouth, in that order. Anything that puts them out of the tournament is a good thing, IMHO. If it affects their NCAA bid chances, I don't care a whit. Winning in Albany is important. Seeing Dartmouth in the NCAAs pales in comparison.
The team also has a bone to pick with Clarkson.
But one thing about Yale coming would be that then Vermont would get an easier opponent as well in their QF. So which would you rather have?:
Cornell v Yale
Harvard v SLU
Colgate v Brown
Vermont v Clunion
or
Cornell v Clunion
Harvard v SLU
Colgate v Brown
Vermont v Dartmouth
Since there are positive/negative points for each, this is a case of reaching into the Coach's Bag O' Cliches: "we don't care who we play. All of our league opponents are dangerous, well-coached teams. We need to take care of our own business and not worry about watching the scoreboard, and the good Lord willing, things will work out."[/q]
I believe the two most dangerous teams for us are Harvard and Dartmouth, in that order. Anything that puts them out of the tournament is a good thing, IMHO. If it affects their NCAA bid chances, I don't care a whit. Winning in Albany is important. Seeing Dartmouth in the NCAAs pales in comparison.
___________________________
Al DeFlorio '65
Al DeFlorio '65
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: Trotsky (---.frdrmd.adelphia.net)
Date: March 06, 2005 10:48AM
Maybe a team that knocks out Dartmouth is by definition more dangerous than Dartmouth, in the short term (hot goalie, team coming together at the right time, sold their souls to Satan, blah blah blah...).
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: Al DeFlorio (---.ne.client2.attbi.com)
Date: March 06, 2005 11:40AM
[Q]Trotsky Wrote:
Maybe a team that knocks out Dartmouth is by definition more dangerous than Dartmouth, in the short term (hot goalie, team coming together at the right time, sold their souls to Satan, blah blah blah...).[/q]
Maybe, but certainly not "by definition."
In any case, I'd be happy to take that chance. Little doubt in my mind that Dartmouth's "more dangerous" than Yale.
Maybe a team that knocks out Dartmouth is by definition more dangerous than Dartmouth, in the short term (hot goalie, team coming together at the right time, sold their souls to Satan, blah blah blah...).[/q]
Maybe, but certainly not "by definition."
In any case, I'd be happy to take that chance. Little doubt in my mind that Dartmouth's "more dangerous" than Yale.
___________________________
Al DeFlorio '65
Al DeFlorio '65
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: ugarte (---.ny325.east.verizon.net)
Date: March 06, 2005 11:54AM
[Q]Trotsky Wrote:
Maybe a team that knocks out Dartmouth is by definition more dangerous than Dartmouth, in the short term (hot goalie, team coming together at the right time, sold their souls to Satan, blah blah blah...).[/q]I'm not a big believer in momentum. Even if Yale beats Dartmouth tonight, I would still rather face them next weekend than keep Dartmouth hanging around as a potential opponent in Albany.
Ari - the team practices at Lynah. They play to win. Once we are in the playoffs I want cupcake city for as long as possible. Go Yale.*
*One night only.
Maybe a team that knocks out Dartmouth is by definition more dangerous than Dartmouth, in the short term (hot goalie, team coming together at the right time, sold their souls to Satan, blah blah blah...).[/q]I'm not a big believer in momentum. Even if Yale beats Dartmouth tonight, I would still rather face them next weekend than keep Dartmouth hanging around as a potential opponent in Albany.
Ari - the team practices at Lynah. They play to win. Once we are in the playoffs I want cupcake city for as long as possible. Go Yale.*
*One night only.
___________________________
quality tweets | bluesky (twitter 2) | ALAB Series podcast | Other podcasts and writing
quality tweets | bluesky (twitter 2) | ALAB Series podcast | Other podcasts and writing
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: RichH (---.stny.res.rr.com)
Date: March 06, 2005 12:36PM
[Q]Trotsky Wrote:
But one thing about Yale coming would be that then Vermont would get an easier opponent as well in their QF. So which would you rather have?:
Cornell v Yale
Harvard v SLU
Colgate v Brown
Vermont v Clunion
or
Cornell v Clunion
Harvard v SLU
Colgate v Brown
Vermont v Dartmouth
[/q]
Actually, should Yale win, all teams would have different-than-expected opponents. Vermont gets the highest seed to emerge from this weekend:
Yale win:
Cornell vs. Yale
Harvard vs. Clunion
Colgate vs. SLU
Vermont vs. Brown
Dartmouth win:
Cornell vs. Clunion
Harvard vs. SLU
Colgate vs. Brown
Vermont vs. Dartmouth
Harvard has always had trouble with Clarkson. I believe that I read that this was the first year the Crimson have swept the Knights since the 1980s. On the other hand, I really believe that SLU has its game together. They made Cornell dig deep last weekend, rolled Colgate, and just laid 104 shots on Princeton this weekend. The Saints could be poised to do what Clarkson did in 2004.
But one thing about Yale coming would be that then Vermont would get an easier opponent as well in their QF. So which would you rather have?:
Cornell v Yale
Harvard v SLU
Colgate v Brown
Vermont v Clunion
or
Cornell v Clunion
Harvard v SLU
Colgate v Brown
Vermont v Dartmouth
[/q]
Actually, should Yale win, all teams would have different-than-expected opponents. Vermont gets the highest seed to emerge from this weekend:
Yale win:
Cornell vs. Yale
Harvard vs. Clunion
Colgate vs. SLU
Vermont vs. Brown
Dartmouth win:
Cornell vs. Clunion
Harvard vs. SLU
Colgate vs. Brown
Vermont vs. Dartmouth
Harvard has always had trouble with Clarkson. I believe that I read that this was the first year the Crimson have swept the Knights since the 1980s. On the other hand, I really believe that SLU has its game together. They made Cornell dig deep last weekend, rolled Colgate, and just laid 104 shots on Princeton this weekend. The Saints could be poised to do what Clarkson did in 2004.
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: Trotsky (---.frdrmd.adelphia.net)
Date: March 06, 2005 12:42PM
[Q]RichH Wrote:
Actually, should Yale win, all teams would have different-than-expected opponents.
You're right of course. Brain fart.[/q]
Actually, should Yale win, all teams would have different-than-expected opponents.
You're right of course. Brain fart.[/q]
Re: Scores 3/5 (Sat.)
Posted by: calgARI '07 (205.232.75.---)
Date: March 06, 2005 02:35PM
SLU is really coming on and I think they have a decent shot at beating Harvard and an even better shot if they play Colgate.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.