Sunday, May 12th, 2024
 
 
 
Updates automatically
Twitter Link
CHN iOS App
 
NCAA
1967 1970

ECAC
1967 1968 1969 1970 1973 1980 1986 1996 1997 2003 2005 2010

IVY
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1977 1978 1983 1984 1985 1996 1997 2002 2003 2004 2005 2012 2014

Cleary Jell-O Mold
2002 2003 2005

Ned Harkness Cup
2003 2005 2008 2013
 
Brendon
Iles
Pokulok
Schafer
Syphilis

INCH Power rankings(on ESPN.com)

Posted by Squith 
INCH Power rankings(on ESPN.com)
Posted by: Squith (204.182.58.---)
Date: February 28, 2005 06:54PM

[insidecollegehockey.com]

CU at number one.. the 4x4 is ESPNs NCAA bracketology
 
Re: INCH Power rankings(on ESPN.com)
Posted by: aznxjz (128.84.19.---)
Date: February 28, 2005 07:00PM

they have harvard as a 2 seed...
 
Re: INCH Power rankings(on ESPN.com)
Posted by: Josh '99 (---.nyc.rr.com)
Date: February 28, 2005 07:14PM

Harvard is #8 in the PWR, unweighted or 3-2-1 weighted. A #2 seed for them seems reasonable at the moment. (Meanwhile, with their strong weekend, Dartmouth has jumped up into a tie for 9th, and Colgate has dropped off the bubble altogether for the time being.)
 
Re: INCH Power rankings(on ESPN.com)
Posted by: TCHL8842 (---.resnet.cornell.edu)
Date: February 28, 2005 07:43PM

Did anyone notice the Worchester Bracket on the 4x4, it is almost like the Beanpot minus NU. The final could get a huge turnout, if BC plays BU for the chance for Frozen Four berth. Just thought that bracket was interesting with all those Boston teams in it.
 
Re: INCH Power rankings(on ESPN.com)
Posted by: billhoward (---.union01.nj.comcast.net)
Date: February 28, 2005 09:38PM

Hmmm, and who would that be beating out Hyphen-Sieve for all- East first team:

>>> [Harvard ranked #10:] Hard to believe it's true, but Dov Grumet-Morris's .948 save percentage and 1.58 goals-against average will only be good enough to get second-team All-ECACHL. [insidecollegehockey.com]
 
Re: INCH Power rankings(on ESPN.com)
Posted by: ben03 (---.rochester.res.rr.com)
Date: February 28, 2005 10:00PM

i think you know the answer to that question bill ...

 
___________________________
Let's GO Red!!!
 
Re: INCH Power rankings(on ESPN.com)
Posted by: Josh '99 (---.nyc.rr.com)
Date: February 28, 2005 10:51PM

Let's wait it until we hear that from some official channel before we start bragging about it, eh?
 
Re: INCH Power rankings(on ESPN.com)
Posted by: ugarte (---.ny325.east.verizon.net)
Date: February 28, 2005 11:48PM

[Q]TCHL8842 Wrote:

Did anyone notice the Worchester Bracket on the 4x4, it is almost like the Beanpot minus NU. The final could get a huge turnout, if BC plays BU for the chance for Frozen Four berth. Just thought that bracket was interesting with all those Boston teams in it.[/q]So then I guess Harvard is out in the first round...



 
 
Re: INCH Power rankings(on ESPN.com)
Posted by: DeltaOne81 (---.raytheon.com)
Date: March 01, 2005 09:41AM

[Q]ugarte Wrote:
So then I guess Harvard is out in the first round...[/q]
This is the NCAAs, what's new about that?
 
Re: INCH Power rankings(on ESPN.com)
Posted by: Steve M (---.fluor.com)
Date: March 01, 2005 09:45AM

For all the abuse the Inch site takes, I think they have a better sense for how the NCAA will assign teams to regionals than USCHO. twitch
 
Re: INCH Power rankings(on ESPN.com)
Posted by: DeltaOne81 (---.raytheon.com)
Date: March 01, 2005 09:50AM

[Q]Steve M Wrote:

For all the abuse the Inch site takes, I think they have a better sense for how the NCAA will assign teams to regionals than USCHO. [/q]
INCH is predicting the way they think it will end, not based on currently rankings. USCHO is doing "if the season ended today", and its hard to argue with their results. Some seedings, like us in Minnesota, aren't pretty, but it *is* how the committee works.
 
Re: INCH Power rankings(on ESPN.com)
Posted by: Steve M (---.fluor.com)
Date: March 01, 2005 10:07AM

I know that INCH is predicting a season end and USCHO is predicting them as they stand today. INCH, however, is keeping a lot of teams close to their campuses. The odds of that happening are very low if the committee puts a priority on competitive equity (natural or serpentine brackets, 1d vs. 2a etc.) to the exclusion of attendance concerns, as USCHO's Bracketology articles have done. I'm probably giving INCH more credit than they deserve, though, since you can't compare their predicted brackets to any current PWR standings, and USCHO has a much better track record the last 2 years.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/01/2005 02:59PM by Steve M.
 

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login