Cornell at Colgate on T.V.?

does anyone know if the game at Colgate will be televised? If so on what channel?

[Q]Chris Wrote:

does anyone know if the game at Colgate will be televised? If so on what channel?[/q]
[cornellbigred.collegesports.com]

[Q]Friday's game will be televised, airing to a local audience on Time Warner Sports, channel 26. Mark Larson will have the call, with analysis from Dan Liedka.[/Q]

... stupid Time Warner ...

So really, how much trouble could some one get in for webcasting the television feed?

If you webcast the TV feed, I promise I won't tell a soul.

yes on the college tv channel, its number 175 in Florida O

[Q]pfm10 Wrote: So really, how much trouble could some one get in for webcasting the television feed?
[/q]

Fascinating question: As a practical matter, first time, correction, first time you get caught, not much.

If you streamed the whole show, let's see, you are increasing Time-Warner's viewing audience and eyeballs watching the commercials.

Posting just the clip of the winning goal, that would probably annoy them, but OTOH, if TW hasn't posted it on the TW site, you could argue it had no value to TW, so what are they losing out on. If the clip just started off with a credit "From Time Warner Cable of the Finger Lakes," you could probably get away with posting it for 2-3 days at least before someone saw it and complained. Maybe you could treat it like those creche scenes at town hall in small towns: technically illegal but only once somebody complains.

Maybe post the clip on a rogue server in the Ukraine and just post a reference to it here.

Hollywood and TV types are paranoid about new media because these supposedly creative types don't know or do diddly about how future technology will benefit them. Remember the VCR and then the DVD player were to be the death of Hollywood twice over and alas we haven't had that misfortune. In fact, they can get a majority of their revenue from places other than the silver screen.

Not that piracy isn't a huge issue. Hollywood/TV people aren't worried about us swapping this, not as Crackdown Priority One, at least. It's the widespread duplication of movies by the thousands, sometimes as soon as, sometimes *before* the film hits the movie theaters. And a lot of that is inside jobs. Remember the flap a couple years back where the Oscar screeners were going to be sent out on VHS not DVD so the quality of the rips would be lower? (There also was in incredibly stupid piece in the NY Times Arts section last month in which the guest author argued that that filming the movie in the theater for later pirated distribution, including heads in the way and audience noises, is a new art form. Right.)

Hollywood's problem is Hollywood people pay the amount - nothing - for entertainment that the rest of us which we paid.

Changing the subject slightly: Cornell could provide incredibly higher video quality if it was streamed in almost but not real time, meaning if you gave the game a 5- or 10-minute head start to buffer over the annoying glitches and stops. I guess you would work backwards from game's end, say 9:15 for a 7:00 start, and start watching at say 7:15. You would still have the low-res live feed for the people who want to see it truly live (remotely).

CSTV could do that with its archives and sell it to Akimbo, which has a $200 device that's sort of a streaming TiVo. Or you could just do it directly to youir PC as MovieLink does now (MovieLink: Incredible concept, almost no movies there worth watching.)