Tuesday, May 14th, 2024
 
 
 
Updates automatically
Twitter Link
CHN iOS App
 
NCAA
1967 1970

ECAC
1967 1968 1969 1970 1973 1980 1986 1996 1997 2003 2005 2010

IVY
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1977 1978 1983 1984 1985 1996 1997 2002 2003 2004 2005 2012 2014

Cleary Jell-O Mold
2002 2003 2005

Ned Harkness Cup
2003 2005 2008 2013
 
Brendon
Iles
Pokulok
Schafer
Syphilis

How good are the Patriots?

Posted by Red Man 
Page: Previous1 2 
Current Page: 2 of 2
Re: How good are the Patriots?
Posted by: Nate 04 (---.raytheon.com)
Date: February 07, 2005 01:35PM

[Q]Red Man Wrote:

Birds = 2nd best team in the NFL. [/q]

Tell us something, that us non-Patriots fans didn't already know:-D. The real question is how much time was left on the clock before you stopped being nervous that the Eagles were going to pull it out? I'm guessing it was about 13 seconds at the earliest.

11 years and counting that the Bills have not lost a Superbowl!!
 
Diamonds in the rough
Posted by: jtwcornell91 (---.no.no.cox.net)
Date: February 07, 2005 01:44PM

Of course, a lot of that was reputation anyway. Going into the Everblades, Cornell and NoDak had the best records in the country, and despite assumptions to the contrary, we had played a much tougher schedule.


 
___________________________
JTW

Enjoy the latest hockey geek tools at [www.elynah.com]
 
Re: How good are the Patriots?
Posted by: Avash (---.psych.cornell.edu)
Date: February 07, 2005 03:23PM

[Q]Nate 04 Wrote:

I think this game also showed the Ken Jennings effect. [/q]

I miss him. When's the Tournament of Champions?! nut
 
Re: How good are the Patriots?
Posted by: CUlater 89 (---.nyc.rr.com)
Date: February 07, 2005 11:52PM

[Q]Nate 04 Wrote:

I think this game also showed the Ken Jennings effect. It's a big deal to have been in the championship situation before (Jennings just got so comfortable on Jeapordy, and everyone else was so nervous no one could beat him for a long time). I thought McNabb looked really tight at times when he just couldn't get his passes anywhere near the reciever. And no doubt they really were lost at the end of the game (I think he thought it was still the 3rd quarter...). The Eagles showed they are a great team. The Pats showed they are better than great and that having the experience of being in the Superbowl really benefitted them.[/q]

I didn't think McNabb was nervous (I was at the game a few rows up behind the Eagle bench); in fact, I thought he played as he often has over the last few years. I've followed him closely for the last three years, since he was the QB on my fantasy team, and he's had plenty of games where he makes some great plays and throws but also throws it into the ground or floats it or just puts the receiver in a bad position. Going into the game, I thought he needed to play at an MVP level for the Eagles to win, and had he, they likely would have won. The thing that bothered me was the inability of the Eagles to get him the opportunity to run, on designed plays. Credit the Pats for making sure that didn't happen.
 
Page: Previous1 2 
Current Page: 2 of 2

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login