Sunday, May 5th, 2024
 
 
 
Updates automatically
Twitter Link
CHN iOS App
 
NCAA
1967 1970

ECAC
1967 1968 1969 1970 1973 1980 1986 1996 1997 2003 2005 2010

IVY
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1977 1978 1983 1984 1985 1996 1997 2002 2003 2004 2005 2012 2014

Cleary Spittoon
2002 2003 2005

Ned Harkness Cup
2003 2005 2008 2013
 
Brendon
Iles
Pokulok
Schafer
Syphilis

Harvard vs NM, NM wins Shootout 3-2

Posted by Killer 
Harvard vs NM, NM wins Shootout 3-2
Posted by: Killer (---.c3-0.nat-ubr6.sbo-nat.ma.cable.rcn.co)
Date: December 22, 2004 07:55PM

Just heard that with 7:00 left in the game it's 0-0.

Edit 1: Regulation just ended. Still zip.

Edit 2: Going to a shootout.

Edit 3: 1st NM shot hit crossbar. 1st H shot hit post. Arrgghh!

Edit 4: 2-2 after 4 shots

Edit 5: 2-2 after 5 shots

Edit 6: 3-2 NM on 6th shot
Edited 6 time(s). Last edit at 12/22/2004 08:24PM by Killer.
 
Re: Harvard vs Northern Michigan
Posted by: atb9 (---.nycap.rr.com)
Date: December 22, 2004 07:58PM

thanks for the heads up!

 
___________________________
24 is the devil
 
Re: Harvard vs Northern Michigan
Posted by: Killer (---.c3-0.nat-ubr6.sbo-nat.ma.cable.rcn.co)
Date: December 22, 2004 08:03PM

I just put it on the radio a few minutes ago. Sounds like a lot of action, but no goals. Harvard dodged a pair of 2-on-1 breaks moments ago. I think I heard them say that the SOG stat was something like 35-31 NM.

1:15 to go.
 
Re: Harvard vs NM, NM wins Shootout 3-2
Posted by: atb9 (---.nycap.rr.com)
Date: December 22, 2004 08:49PM

Man, shootouts stink...if the team you're rooting for loses :-( At least it goes into the books as a tie but they probably won't get a shot at Minnesota now

 
___________________________
24 is the devil
 
Re: Harvard vs NM, NM wins Shootout 3-2
Posted by: Killer (---.c3-0.nat-ubr6.sbo-nat.ma.cable.rcn.co)
Date: December 22, 2004 09:07PM

Yeah, the announcers sounded pretty bummed that they'll probably play Merrimack tomorrow.
 
Re: Harvard vs NM, NM wins Shootout 3-2
Posted by: Al DeFlorio (---.ne.client2.attbi.com)
Date: December 22, 2004 10:26PM

According to the USCHO recap, Harvard had 15 players on antibiotics in the past week with some kind of respiratory illness. Tough game to lose.

 
___________________________
Al DeFlorio '65
 
Re: Harvard vs NM, NM wins Shootout 3-2
Posted by: A-19 (---.echryh01.nj.comcast.net)
Date: December 22, 2004 11:19PM

Al,

per uscho recap: "Harvard (9-3-2) was limited in practice this week by illness. Donato described as many as 15 players on antibiotics for a respiratory ailment that swept the team, but refused to use that as an out."

Sounds like a bad pizza hut trip. maybe that flu will cycle back to cambridge in early january, which would be great as long as i don't catch it.

-mike
 
Re: Harvard vs NM, NM wins Shootout 3-2
Posted by: Tom14850 (---.client.comcast.net)
Date: December 22, 2004 11:23PM

And Minnesota wins the late game, so Harvard goes all the way to Minnesota to play another Boston team. That kinda sucks.
 
Re: Harvard vs NM, NM wins Shootout 3-2
Posted by: Al DeFlorio (---.ne.client2.attbi.com)
Date: December 22, 2004 11:36PM

[Q]Tom14850 Wrote:

And Minnesota wins the late game, so Harvard goes all the way to Minnesota to play another Boston team. That kinda sucks.[/q]
Right. Try telling Harvard when they face-off tomorrow against Merrimack that they didn't really lose tonight's game. yark

 
___________________________
Al DeFlorio '65
 
Re: Harvard vs NM, NM wins Shootout 3-2
Posted by: Josh '99 (---.bc.yu.edu)
Date: December 23, 2004 04:21PM

[Q]A-19 Wrote:
Sounds like a bad pizza hut trip. maybe that flu will cycle back to cambridge in early january, which would be great as long as i don't catch it.[/q]
If you need to get the flu in order for us to win at Harvard in January, well, I'm willing to make that sacrifice. B-]
 
Re: Harvard vs NM, NM wins Shootout 3-2
Posted by: French Rage (---.wdc2-4-8-136-225.wdc2.dsl-verizon.net)
Date: December 23, 2004 05:57PM

[Q]jmh30 Wrote:

A-19 Wrote:
Sounds like a bad pizza hut trip. maybe that flu will cycle back to cambridge in early january, which would be great as long as i don't catch it.[/Q]
If you need to get the flu in order for us to win at Harvard in January, well, I'm willing to make that sacrifice. [/q]

I agree wholeheartedly. Mike, you need to get the flu and then give it to the Harvard team BY ANY MEANS POSSIBLE!
 
Re: Harvard vs NM, NM wins Shootout 3-2
Posted by: Will (---.dyn.optonline.net)
Date: December 23, 2004 06:20PM

[Q]French Rage Wrote:

Mike, you need to get the flu and then give it to the Harvard team BY ANY MEANS POSSIBLE![/q]

I'm pretty sure he means "by any means necessary", but yeah Mike, you need to take one for the team (literally) here. :-D

 
___________________________
Is next year here yet?
 
Merrimack beats 'em, 6-4
Posted by: Al DeFlorio (---.ne.client2.attbi.com)
Date: December 23, 2004 08:20PM

Playing their back-up sieve, Harvard loses to Merrimack, 6-4. Sic transit gloria...top ten ranking, too.

 
___________________________
Al DeFlorio '65
 
Re: Merrimack beats 'em, 6-4
Posted by: billhoward (---.union01.nj.comcast.net)
Date: December 23, 2004 11:50PM

Harvard outshot Merrimack 40-19 in the consolation but gave up four power play goals on five penalties. The other goalie, Justin Tobe, played for Harvard. Note the Cantabs came from 6-2 down to score twice in the last 2-1/2 minutes for the final 6-4 score. That's tenacity.

Of course that still a loss, too.
 
Re: Harvard vs NM, NM wins Shootout 3-2
Posted by: RedAR (---.nrockv01.md.comcast.net)
Date: December 24, 2004 12:58AM

Interesting that Donato seemed to have taken an out of conference game fairly lightly. Yes, it's a consolation game, but isn't it still possible that Harvard will sit on the bubble come the NCAAs?

I understand, giving your safety sieve some game experience is important, but still... To me, it also indicates that Donato, and therefore the Harvard team, showed very little respect for Merrimack, and ended up with a L.

To contrast, Schafer seems to take all regular season games fairly seriously, and almost always uses the strongest line-up in game situations. To be fair, in the past, there were times when I questioned such a decision by him.
 
Re: Harvard vs NM, NM wins Shootout 3-2
Posted by: KenP (---.abrfc.noaa.gov)
Date: December 24, 2004 07:24AM

Since he has a better pulse on the team's physical and mental health, I'm willing to give Teddy the benefit of the doubt here. If 15 players are on antibiotics it may have been more important to rest unhealthy kids than risk injury trying to win this one game.

I wouldn't write off Harvard based on their 4th place result. Will they be gone from the top 10? Yes. Will they be back? Barring injuries, I wouldn't be surprised.
 
Re: Harvard vs NM, NM wins Shootout 3-2
Posted by: billhoward (---.union01.nj.comcast.net)
Date: December 24, 2004 09:08AM

Half the Harvard team was sick. Maybe in Minnesota it was dairy food allergies?

Don't know how much you can blame the backup goalie (who the Crimson said has played well in earlier games when he played) when the team allows 4PPGs in 5 opportunities.

On the other hand, that is useful game experience. I wonder if Cornell will go to the No. 2 to play a game in January - February against someone we can assuredly beat, like a, say ... um, who can we assuredly beat? Yale? Princeton? Union?
 

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login