Friday, May 3rd, 2024
 
 
 
Updates automatically
Twitter Link
CHN iOS App
 
NCAA
1967 1970

ECAC
1967 1968 1969 1970 1973 1980 1986 1996 1997 2003 2005 2010

IVY
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1977 1978 1983 1984 1985 1996 1997 2002 2003 2004 2005 2012 2014

Cleary Jell-O Mold
2002 2003 2005

Ned Harkness Cup
2003 2005 2008 2013
 
Brendon
Iles
Pokulok
Schafer
Syphilis

2005-06 ECAC Traveling Partnerships

Posted by Greg Berge 
2005-06 ECAC Traveling Partnerships
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.cust-rtr.swbell.net)
Date: November 04, 2004 09:57AM

[www.nhregister.com]

Brown-Quinnipiac
Yale-Brown
Harvard-Dartmouth
Cornell-Colgate
Princeton-Yale
SLU-Clarkson

OK, wait a minute, that makes no sense.... ;-)
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/04/2004 09:57AM by Greg Berge.
 
Re: 2005-06 ECAC Traveling Partnerships
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.cust-rtr.swbell.net)
Date: November 04, 2004 10:01AM

I assume they meant:

Cornell-Colgate
RPI-Union
SLU-Clarkson
Dartmouth-Harvard
Princeton-Quinnipiac
Brown-Yale
 
Re: 2005-06 ECAC Traveling Partnerships
Posted by: Josh '99 (---.yw.yu.edu)
Date: November 04, 2004 10:14AM

Really? Since they had Brown paired with Q as the first listing, I figured they were going for:

Cornell-Colgate
Harvard-Dartmouth
Brown-Quinnipiac
Yale-Princeton
RPI-Union
Clarkson-SLU

Edit: Which would seem to make sense given that Hamden is (if only marginally) closer to Providence than New Haven is. Also breaks up fewer existing partnerships.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/04/2004 10:16AM by jmh30.
 
Re: 2005-06 ECAC Traveling Partnerships
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.cust-rtr.swbell.net)
Date: November 04, 2004 10:17AM

According to the USCHO thread, it is in fact Brown-Yale; Harvard-Dartmouth; Quinnipiac-Princeton. People are already complaining that it makes no sense.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/04/2004 10:18AM by Greg Berge.
 
Re: 2005-06 ECAC Traveling Partnerships
Posted by: Josh '99 (---.yw.yu.edu)
Date: November 04, 2004 10:19AM

[Q]Greg Berge Wrote:

According to the USCHO thread, it is in fact Brown-Yale; Harvard-Dartmouth; Quinnipiac-Princeton. People are already complaining that it makes no sense.[/q]Well, it DOES make no sense. nut
 
Re: 2005-06 ECAC Traveling Partnerships
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.cust-rtr.swbell.net)
Date: November 04, 2004 10:20AM

Here's the section of the article:

(snip)

There’s a chance Quinnipiac could play all of its games at Ingalls.

The ECAC announced the Bobcats will join with Princeton as league travel partners. Yale, which has been paired with Princeton for more than a decade, will partner with Brown while Harvard and Dartmouth will match up starting next season.

McDonald said the school is close to securing the Hartford Civic Center for its inaugural ECAC home game against Harvard on Nov. 4, 2005. The Bobcats may also use the same venue to play host to Dartmouth the following evening.

If construction goes according to plan, Quinnipiac’s new 3,500-seat hockey arena is scheduled to open in January 2007 with a game against — who else — Yale
 
Re: 2005-06 ECAC Traveling Partnerships
Posted by: Will (---.cable.mindspring.com)
Date: November 04, 2004 10:25AM

The obvious problem is that you either get two moderate-sized pairs (Brown-Yale and Q-Princeton) or one really close pair and one really far pair (Yale-Q and Brown-Princeton). There's no good solution, and I don't think any solution particularly makes sense. Then again, in the latter plan, it actually gives Princeton a sporting chance to do well in the conference. :-D

 
___________________________
Is next year here yet?
 
Re: 2005-06 ECAC Traveling Partnerships
Posted by: Al DeFlorio (---.ne.client2.attbi.com)
Date: November 04, 2004 10:39AM

[Q]jmh30 Wrote:

Greg Berge Wrote:

According to the USCHO thread, it is in fact Brown-Yale; Harvard-Dartmouth; Quinnipiac-Princeton. People are already complaining that it makes no sense.[/Q]
Well, it DOES make no sense. [/q]
Choosing Quinnipiac made no sense in the first place.



 
___________________________
Al DeFlorio '65
 
Re: 2005-06 ECAC Traveling Partnerships
Posted by: DeltaOne81 (---.raytheon.com)
Date: November 04, 2004 11:48AM

I think they decided to return to the old days of Yale-Brown, so long as they were returning to the old days of Harvard-Dartmouth. The difference is travel times between Hamden and New Haven is trivial. In fact, actually travel time wise, New Haven is probably close to both, since its on 95... from Hamden you're gonna have to go down to New Haven to get on 95 to head north to Brown, or south to Princeton. So travel-wise it was a wash.
 
Re: 2005-06 ECAC Traveling Partnerships
Posted by: jeh25 (---.epsy.uconn.edu)
Date: November 04, 2004 11:56AM

[Q]jmh30 Wrote:

Really? Since they had Brown paired with Q as the first listing, I figured they were going for:

Cornell-Colgate
Harvard-Dartmouth
Brown-Quinnipiac
Yale-Princeton
RPI-Union
Clarkson-SLU

Edit: Which would seem to make sense given that Hamden is (if only marginally) closer to Providence than New Haven is. Also breaks up fewer existing partnerships.



Edited 1 times. Last edit at 11/04/04 10:16AM by jmh30.[/q]

Actually, Hamden is farther from Providence travelwise... by about 10 minutes.





 
___________________________
Cornell '98 '00; Yale 01-03; UConn 03-07; Brown 07-09; Penn State faculty 09-
Work is no longer an excuse to live near an ECACHL team... :(
 
Re: 2005-06 ECAC Traveling Partnerships
Posted by: DeltaOne81 (---.raytheon.com)
Date: November 04, 2004 11:58AM

[Q]jeh25 Wrote:

jmh30 Wrote:

Actually, Hamden is farther from Providence travelwise... by about 10 minutes.[/q]

The Connecticut contingent (well, me formerly, at least) strikes again ;-)
 
Re: 2005-06 ECAC Traveling Partnerships
Posted by: Josh '99 (---.yw.yu.edu)
Date: November 04, 2004 12:41PM

Alright, I'll certainly cede to the Connecticut folks on the travel time issue. The map I looked at made Hamden look (again, at best, marginally) closer to Providence, but that was pure as-the-crow-flies distance. If what you guys are saying is right, then this does make the most sense. (As opposed to, say, Yale-Quinnipiac and Brown-Princeton).
 
Re: 2005-06 ECAC Traveling Partnerships
Posted by: ursusminor (---.nrl.navy.mil)
Date: November 04, 2004 02:13PM

Having Yale and Quinnipiac in different pairings also allows for the possibility of QU using Yale's rink when they are on the road.
 
Re: 2005-06 ECAC Traveling Partnerships
Posted by: A-19 (---.harvard.edu)
Date: November 04, 2004 03:40PM

well, the harvard weekend certainly got a bit more interesting
 
Re: 2005-06 ECAC Traveling Partnerships
Posted by: nyc94 (66.147.178.---)
Date: November 04, 2004 03:54PM

[Q]A-19 Wrote:

well, the harvard weekend certainly got a bit more interesting[/q]

And time consuming - for me anyway.

 
Re: 2005-06 ECAC Traveling Partnerships
Posted by: jeh25 (---.ri.ri.cox.net)
Date: November 04, 2004 05:34PM

[Q]ursaminor Wrote:

Having Yale and Quinnipiac in different pairings also allows for the possibility of QU using Yale's rink when they are on the road.[/q]

I assume the Yale women normally use Ingalls when the men are travelling.



 
___________________________
Cornell '98 '00; Yale 01-03; UConn 03-07; Brown 07-09; Penn State faculty 09-
Work is no longer an excuse to live near an ECACHL team... :(
 
Re: 2005-06 ECAC Traveling Partnerships
Posted by: KeithK (---.external.lmco.com)
Date: November 04, 2004 07:05PM

[q]I assume the Yale women normally use Ingalls when the men are travelling. [/q]Depends on when their games are. Judging by this year, the Yale women already play their Saturday games at 4pm (looks like a standard ECAC thing) and have a couple of Sunday games. I can imagine a deal where the Yale women play Saturday/Sunday for a year or two, with Yale presumably getting payment or a part of the gate. Or else the opposite.
 
Re: 2005-06 ECAC Traveling Partnerships
Posted by: JDeafv (---.howard01.md.comcast.net)
Date: November 04, 2004 11:21PM

This makes no sense - the current system would split up 3 of the current partners, the following system would only split up 2.

Why not:
Cornell-Colgate (duh)
RPI-Union (duh)
SLU-Clarkson (duh)
Brown-Harvard (convenient for Southwest cheap tickets and only 1 hour apart)
Dartmouth-Yale
Princeton-Quinnipiac

The Dartmouth-Yale pair is only marginally farther than Dartmouth-Brown, and it keeps Harvard-Brown together.


 
Re: 2005-06 ECAC Traveling Partnerships
Posted by: billhoward (65.169.92.---)
Date: November 05, 2004 12:16AM

[Q]JDeafv Wrote:

This makes no sense - the current system would split up 3 of the current partners, the following system would only split up 2.

Why not:
Cornell-Colgate (duh)
RPI-Union (duh)
SLU-Clarkson (duh)
Brown-Harvard (convenient for Southwest cheap tickets and only 1 hour apart)
Dartmouth-Yale
Princeton-Quinnipiac

The Dartmouth-Yale pair is only marginally farther than Dartmouth-Brown, and it keeps Harvard-Brown together.


[/q]

Isn't the Ivy basketball pairing Harvard-Dartmouth and Yale-Brown already?
 
Re: 2005-06 ECAC Traveling Partnerships
Posted by: KeithK (---.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net)
Date: November 05, 2004 01:22AM

[q]Isn't the Ivy basketball pairing Harvard-Dartmouth and Yale-Brown already? [/q]Yes.
 
Re: 2005-06 ECAC Traveling Partnerships
Posted by: jtwcornell91 (---.ne.client2.attbi.com)
Date: November 05, 2004 01:23AM

Personally, I was hoping for a Princeton-Dartmouth travel partnership. :-P

 
___________________________
JTW

Enjoy the latest hockey geek tools at [www.elynah.com]
 

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login