Saturday, May 18th, 2024
 
 
 
Updates automatically
Twitter Link
CHN iOS App
 
NCAA
1967 1970

ECAC
1967 1968 1969 1970 1973 1980 1986 1996 1997 2003 2005 2010

IVY
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1977 1978 1983 1984 1985 1996 1997 2002 2003 2004 2005 2012 2014

Cleary Jell-O Mold
2002 2003 2005

Ned Harkness Cup
2003 2005 2008 2013
 
Brendon
Iles
Pokulok
Schafer
Syphilis

2005 TBRW Predictions

Posted by Greg Berge 
2005 TBRW Predictions
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.frdrmd.adelphia.net)
Date: September 04, 2004 01:07PM

TBRW Predictions: [www.tbrw.info]

01 Cornell
02 Colgate
03 Harvard
04 Dartmouth
05 Clarkson
06 RPI
07 Brown
08 Union
09 St. Lawrence
10 Yale
11 Vermont
12 Princeton
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/04/2004 01:08PM by Greg Berge.
 
Re: 2005 TBRW Predictions
Posted by: Will (---.cable.mindspring.com)
Date: September 04, 2004 11:49PM

Hey Greg, for the 2006 predictions, how will Quinnipiac be figured into the standings? For that matter, how will games against Vermont be considered?

 
___________________________
Is next year here yet?
 
Re: 2005 TBRW Predictions
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.frdrmd.adelphia.net)
Date: September 05, 2004 09:09AM

Games against UVM will count the same as they do now -- they're convenient data points (comparison against like opponent under like circumstances).

I'll be thinking of creatively self-serving methods for dealing with QU throughout the season. Among the ways I am currently considering:
+ Just put them last.
+ Start them last in RS, Prev3, and Prv10; then add the other factors.
+ Ignore them; rank the other 11 teams and consider QU to be an unknown floater.
 
Re: 2005 TBRW Predictions
Posted by: ursusminor (---.ipt.aol.com)
Date: September 05, 2004 05:41PM

Why not just put them one position above Union because we all know that "Q" is always followed by "U". rolleyes
 
Re: 2005 TBRW Predictions
Posted by: jy3 (---.buff.east.verizon.net)
Date: September 07, 2004 05:06PM

[Q]ursaminor Wrote:

Why not just put them one position above Union because we all know that "Q" is always followed by "U". [/q]


laugh

any way we can compare them to the ecac schools at the end of this season thru the schedule like the computer rankings try to do? would that help at all? help

 
___________________________
LGR!!!!!!!!!!
jy3 '00
 
Re: 2005 TBRW Predictions
Posted by: KeithK (---.external.lmco.com)
Date: September 07, 2004 06:26PM

Sure, we can compare Q against the ECAC schools using computer rankings at the end of this upcoming season. But while KRACH will tell you how Q compares to Princeton this year, it won't say anything about how Q will compare for the 05-06 season. Certainly it gives an indication, but you have to factor in other effects (graduation, incoming freshmen, etc.) that don't show up in the rankings.

I'd probably choose to take the simplest route and ignore Q for next year's predictions. But Greg will do what Greg decides to do for TBRW?.
 

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login