Monday, May 20th, 2024
 
 
 
Updates automatically
Twitter Link
CHN iOS App
 
NCAA
1967 1970

ECAC
1967 1968 1969 1970 1973 1980 1986 1996 1997 2003 2005 2010

IVY
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1977 1978 1983 1984 1985 1996 1997 2002 2003 2004 2005 2012 2014

Cleary Bedpan
2002 2003 2005

Ned Harkness Cup
2003 2005 2008 2013
 
Brendon
Iles
Pokulok
Schafer
Syphilis

[LAX] Cornell vs Navy NCAA QF Game thread

Posted by Greg Berge 
[LAX] Cornell vs Navy NCAA QF Game thread
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.dc.dc.cox.net)
Date: May 23, 2004 12:20PM

Scoreless after 1 quarter. Cornell is playing a great slowdown game, and has had the best 2 chances of the game. Navy is very athletic.

Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/23/2004 12:20PM by Greg Berge.
 
Re: [LAX] Cornell vs Navy NCAA QF Game thread
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.dc.dc.cox.net)
Date: May 23, 2004 12:32PM

1-1 7:30 to go in first half, Greenhalgh with a gorgeous goal.
 
Re: [LAX] Cornell vs Navy NCAA QF Game thread
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.dc.dc.cox.net)
Date: May 23, 2004 12:32PM

COLLINS, 2-1! 6:52 to go in first half.
 
Cornell 2 - Navy 1 6:50 2nd
Posted by: CowbellGuy (Moderator)
Date: May 23, 2004 12:33PM

2-1 Cornell - Collins!

 
___________________________
"[Hugh] Jessiman turned out to be a huge specimen of something alright." --Puck Daddy
 
Re: [LAX] Cornell vs Navy NCAA QF Game thread
Posted by: Jamison Smith (66.9.198.---)
Date: May 23, 2004 12:33PM

Sorry if this is a repeated message.

Free internet broadcast of the CU/Navy quarterfinal:

[www.wnav.com]
 
Re: [LAX] Cornell vs Navy NCAA QF Game thread
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.dc.dc.cox.net)
Date: May 23, 2004 12:34PM

2-2. game opening up.
 
Cornell 2 - Navy 2 6:13 2nd
Posted by: CowbellGuy (Moderator)
Date: May 23, 2004 12:34PM

Dingman

 
___________________________
"[Hugh] Jessiman turned out to be a huge specimen of something alright." --Puck Daddy
 
Re: [LAX] Cornell vs Navy NCAA QF Game thread
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.dc.dc.cox.net)
Date: May 23, 2004 12:35PM

Comcast Sportsnet Baltimore coverage is very good.

3-2, Navy.
 
Cornell 2 - Navy 3 5:28 2nd
Posted by: CowbellGuy (Moderator)
Date: May 23, 2004 12:35PM

Cornell 2 - Navy 3 5:28 2nd

 
___________________________
"[Hugh] Jessiman turned out to be a huge specimen of something alright." --Puck Daddy
 
Cornell 3 - Navy 2 End of 2nd
Posted by: CowbellGuy (Moderator)
Date: May 23, 2004 12:42PM

McMonagle is standing on his head. Making some crazyass saves.

 
___________________________
"[Hugh] Jessiman turned out to be a huge specimen of something alright." --Puck Daddy
 
Re: [LAX] Cornell vs Navy NCAA QF Game thread
Posted by: schifty schfive (---.lndnnh.adelphia.net)
Date: May 23, 2004 12:42PM

is there an audio on the internet, if yes, where?
 
Re: [LAX] Cornell vs Navy NCAA QF Game thread
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.dc.dc.cox.net)
Date: May 23, 2004 12:42PM

Great saves down the stretch by McMonogle, 3-2 Navy at the half.
 
Re: [LAX] Cornell vs Navy NCAA QF Game thread
Posted by: Kyle Rose (---.krose.org)
Date: May 23, 2004 12:49PM

It's good to see fox sports did a little better than yesterday's bargain-basement bitrate for today's games. I thought I was watching i2sports. :-)

Kyle

banana
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/23/2004 12:49PM by krose.
 
Re: [LAX] Cornell vs Navy NCAA QF Game thread
Posted by: Killer (---.c3-0.nat-ubr6.sbo-nat.ma.cable.rcn.co)
Date: May 23, 2004 12:55PM

I just found it through Navy's site:

[www.wnav.com]
 
Re: [LAX] Cornell vs Navy NCAA - hate TV scoreboard overlay
Posted by: billhoward (---.union01.nj.comcast.net)
Date: May 23, 2004 12:57PM

[Q]krose Wrote:

It's good to see fox sports did a little better than yesterday's bargain-basement bitrate for today's games. I thought I was watching i2sports. .[/q]

The size of the scoreboard in the upper left corner of the screen is driving me nuts. It says NCAA twice plus the score and time. During the action at the north end of the field, it typically obscures the goal cage. I bet the NCAA in its wisdom requires the word "NCAA" at all times to help brand its self-importance. There's got to be a better way. Let's see if we can find out who the production company is and let them know what a crummy job they're doing.
 
Re: [LAX] Cornell vs Navy NCAA QF Game thread
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.dc.dc.cox.net)
Date: May 23, 2004 12:59PM

Game on, second half. McMonagle has 11 saves, Russell (Navy) has 6.
 
Re: [LAX] Cornell vs Navy NCAA QF Game thread
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.dc.dc.cox.net)
Date: May 23, 2004 01:00PM

4-2, Navy. Man up goal from inside.
 
Re: [LAX] Cornell vs Navy NCAA QF Game thread
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.dc.dc.cox.net)
Date: May 23, 2004 01:08PM

4-3, and naturally we score off a huge open ice (er, grass) hit. :-)


Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/23/2004 01:09PM by Greg Berge.
 
Re: [LAX] Cornell vs Navy NCAA QF Game thread
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.dc.dc.cox.net)
Date: May 23, 2004 01:22PM

4-3 Navy through 3 quarters.
 
Re: [LAX] Cornell vs Navy NCAA QF Game thread
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.dc.dc.cox.net)
Date: May 23, 2004 01:32PM

Navy 5-3 on a great effort, 9:28 in regulation. McConagle still looks great, but we need some goals.
 
Re: [LAX] Cornell vs Navy NCAA QF Game thread
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.dc.dc.cox.net)
Date: May 23, 2004 01:34PM

5-4!!!! Nice bounce shot. 7:24 to go in regulation.
 
Re: [LAX] Cornell vs Navy NCAA QF Game thread
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.dc.dc.cox.net)
Date: May 23, 2004 01:36PM

6-4 one man effort for Navy. 7:17 to go.
 
Re: [LAX] Cornell vs Navy NCAA QF Game thread
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.dc.dc.cox.net)
Date: May 23, 2004 01:36PM

Cornell timeout, 7:03 remaining, 6-4 Navy.
 
Re: [LAX] Cornell vs Navy NCAA QF Game thread
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.dc.dc.cox.net)
Date: May 23, 2004 01:44PM

6-5, COLLINS!!!!!! 1:55 to go.
 
Re: [LAX] Cornell vs Navy NCAA QF Game thread
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.dc.dc.cox.net)
Date: May 23, 2004 01:55PM

6-5 final.
 
Re: [LAX] Cornell vs Navy NCAA QF Game thread
Posted by: Al DeFlorio (---.ne.client2.attbi.com)
Date: May 23, 2004 01:57PM

Cornell had the chances. Too many turnovers. Faceoffs killed us on possession time.

Kessenich's comment about not turning players like Redd, Greenhalgh, and Collins loose earlier to try to get some scores on the board was very insightful.

Terrific effort. They certainly showed they belonged with the "big guys." An amazing season overall. Tough to come so close and see it slip away.

 
___________________________
Al DeFlorio '65
 
Re: [LAX] Cornell vs Navy NCAA QF Game thread
Posted by: billhoward (---.union01.nj.comcast.net)
Date: May 23, 2004 08:01PM

As with the hockey team, this was not a team destined to go all the way. A final four berth would have been an amazing cap to the season and Cornell fell one goal short of that. Who would have thought, going in, that if you held Navy to six goals, you wouldn't win.

Got to hand it to Princeton. They made the comeback Saturday that Cornell almost did Sunday.

And fantastic that three of the four quarterfinal games were won by one goal.

Did I see it right that only about 4,000 saw the south regional quarterfinals?
 
Re: [LAX] Cornell vs Navy NCAA QF Game thread
Posted by: KeithK (---.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net)
Date: May 23, 2004 09:46PM

Rules clarification (still trying to pick up the details of lacrosse). Cornell got called for some kind of violation on the clear a couple of times in the second half. I didn't see any obvious reason for the calls and the announcer didn't really explain. Can anyone help me out here? Time limit to get across midfield maybe?
 
Re: [LAX] Cornell vs Navy NCAA QF Game thread
Posted by: Greenberg '97 (---.dyn.optonline.net)
Date: May 23, 2004 09:58PM

[Q]KeithK Wrote:

Rules clarification (still trying to pick up the details of lacrosse). Cornell got called for some kind of violation on the clear a couple of times in the second half. I didn't see any obvious reason for the calls and the announcer didn't really explain. Can anyone help me out here? Time limit to get across midfield maybe?[/q]

Yeah... I believe you have 10 seconds to clear the midfield line, and then another 10 seconds to get it into the box.

There were also a couple of interesting dead-ball calls in the second game. At one time, Syracuse won the ball when Georgetown failed to clear midfield in time, then lost the ball when they took too much time to set up. And earlier in the game, Georgetown got a delay of game penalty for being within 5 yards of the Syracuse player.

Comments from the game:

Much better turnout by Syracuse fans than Cornell fans -- probably because their townies are bigger fans than ours. Luckily, we both get credit for the 11,000+ attendance, even though much of that didn't get there until 3.

The scoreboard failure was a bit embarrassing. Couple that with the fact that the concession stands hand nothing left but water and gum by the second game, and you wonder if Cornell was really prepared to host such an event.

Also, it was general admission throughout the stadium, but the side you chose at the beginning was where you had to stay the whole day. At least they stamped our hands so we could eat lunch in Collegetown during the break.
 
Re: [LAX] Cornell vs Navy NCAA QF Game thread
Posted by: peterg (---.danicacomputing.com)
Date: May 24, 2004 08:17AM

There were less than 3000 in Virginia according to posts elsewhere.

Given how many local folks walked in yesterday, I suspect that the crowd here was closer to 13000.

BTW, the concessions were a mess yesterday. Not enough of anything. Hard to imagine they didn't anticipate a decent crowd. Concession problems and the scoreboard going dark for the entire second half of the Georgetown-Syracuse game didn't make CU look very good as hosts.
 
Re: [LAX] Cornell vs Navy NCAA QF Game thread
Posted by: Kyle Rose (---.cmbrmaks.akamai.com)
Date: May 24, 2004 02:28PM

Biggest problem to my eyes was the sheer number of turnovers. In the 4th quarter alone, Cornell must have turned over the ball at least three times, and as it seems possessions in lacrosse are much longer than in hockey, a turnover is a huge deal. :-P

Navy seemed like a much better team overall: their possessions were longer, they relied less on the skill of their goalie and more on team defense, faceoffs, and forcing turnovers. This isn't to say Cornell's isn't a skilled team, but they just don't have the depth Navy has. (Lack of depth is a criticism I've also levelled at the hockey team, FWIW.)

Next year.

Cheers,
Kyle

banana
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/24/2004 02:29PM by krose.
 
Sports Center Highlights
Posted by: Steve Marciniec '85 (---.fluor.com)
Date: May 24, 2004 02:56PM

ESPN had a brief segment on the #21 tribute and a few highlights from the QF game vs. Navy.
 
NESN delayed broadcast tonight, May 24
Posted by: Al DeFlorio (---.ne.client2.attbi.com)
Date: May 24, 2004 03:55PM

Anyone who missed the game yesterday can see a delayed broadcast on NESN tonight, May 24, at 9pm EDT.

With all the credit deservedly given McMonagle, it shouldn't be forgotten that Navy's Russell made at least three big-time stops in the first quarter, or Cornell could have jumped out to an early two-or-three-goal lead, perhaps changing the complexion of the rest of the game.

 
___________________________
Al DeFlorio '65
 

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login