Monday, May 20th, 2024
 
 
 
Updates automatically
Twitter Link
CHN iOS App
 
NCAA
1967 1970

ECAC
1967 1968 1969 1970 1973 1980 1986 1996 1997 2003 2005 2010

IVY
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1977 1978 1983 1984 1985 1996 1997 2002 2003 2004 2005 2012 2014

Cleary Jell-O Mold
2002 2003 2005

Ned Harkness Cup
2003 2005 2008 2013
 
Brendon
Iles
Pokulok
Schafer
Syphilis

The race for first

Posted by atb9 
The race for first
Posted by: atb9 (---.nycap.rr.com)
Date: February 20, 2004 11:31PM

We have five teams with in 3 points for first place! Is this a great race, or what? In the five years that I've been following Cornell hockey, it seems like the race is always for the middle positions--a huge log jam in the middle but not at the top. Is this one of the best races we've seen in recent history? Greg, I'm looking for some sort of historical references or atleast a link... ;-)



 
___________________________
24 is the devil
 
Re: The race for first
Posted by: rhovorka (---.stny.rr.com)
Date: February 21, 2004 12:05AM

'95-'96 was a fantastic horse race. There were 5 teams that just wouldn't lose down the stretch. UVM, Clarkson, SLU, Cornell, and Colgate. And the last weekend was CU/CU @ CU/SLU. Cornell lost to Clarkson in OT on Friday to snap a 10-game unbeaten streak in a great "unstoppable force" vs. "immovable object" game. The final game of the season at SLU was an incredible finish as Cornell came back from being 4-2 down in the 3rd to win 5-4. Captain Brad Chartrand scored the winner with under 5:00 remaining. It clinched the home-ice series vs. #5 Colgate, who tied both their games.

Final standings: [www.hockey.cornell.edu]

5 teams reached 30 points. There have only been four 30-point seasons in the last 3 years combined: [members.cox.net]

Looking at that chart, '91 looked interesting, as 6 points seperated 1st and 6th.

2002, however was the ultimate free-for-all (except for Cornell finally attaining the #1 seed). 4 points seperated 3rd (23) from 11th place (19). Imagine being 2 wins (potentially, given tie-breakers) from home-ice, but not even making the playoffs. Sorry, Union.
 
Re: The race for first
Posted by: jtwcornell91 (---.no.no.cox.net)
Date: February 21, 2004 01:37AM


Rich H '96 wrote:

'95-'96 was a fantastic horse race.
Which I got to cover for KCSB 91.9 FM (UC Santa Barbara college radio):
[www.amurgsval.org]

 
Re: The race for first
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.dc.dc.cox.net)
Date: February 21, 2004 08:15AM

For the broad historical view of the ECAC, here are the standings for all seasons: [members.cox.net]

I haven't done a systematic analysis of dispersion (yet), but here are some fun anecdotal observations:

In '91, the top 5 teams were separated by .091. Contrast this with 2002, in which Cornell finished ahead of #2 Clarkson by .204!

The 17-team pre-HE ECAC featured many seasons with 4 team clusters at the top, but none with 5+ except '83, when the top 7 teams were separated by .112.

This is the separation between this season's top 5:

.000 Brown
.000 Colgate
.026 Cornell
.079 RPI
.079 Dartmouth

My award for the most competive season goes to '95, however. There was a separation of .364 for the entire conference, and just .227 separated 3rd from last.

The best measure of a horse race would be to assess the standings immediately prior to, say, the final weekend, and I don't have the data to do that.



Post Edited (02-21-04 08:24)
 

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login