2020-02-08: Cornell 4 Colgate 1
Posted by Trotsky
2020-02-08: Cornell 4 Colgate 1
Posted by: Trotsky (---.washdc.fios.verizon.net)
Date: February 08, 2020 06:54PM
Once more into the breach.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/08/2020 09:37PM by Trotsky.
Re: 2020-02-08: Cornell at Colgate
Posted by: ugarte (---.dyn.optonline.net)
Date: February 08, 2020 09:32PM
Glad nobody got DQ'd for tomorrow but I have a feeling it's going to be chippy.
Dominant win over a team we should dominate.
Dominant win over a team we should dominate.
___________________________
quality tweets | bluesky (twitter 2) | ALAB Series podcast | Other podcasts and writing
quality tweets | bluesky (twitter 2) | ALAB Series podcast | Other podcasts and writing
Re: 2020-02-08: Cornell 4 Colgate 1
Posted by: Trotsky (---.washdc.fios.verizon.net)
Date: February 08, 2020 09:37PM
Colgate with 8 shots in the game. Galajda with 0 saves in the first.
Re: 2020-02-08: Cornell 4 Colgate 1
Posted by: Jeff Hopkins '82 (---.44.98.30.res-cmts.sm.ptd.net)
Date: February 08, 2020 09:39PM
Trotsky
Colgate with 8 shots in the game. Galajda with 0 saves in the first.
According to CHN, 9 shots, but still impressive.
Re: 2020-02-08: Cornell 4 Colgate 1
Posted by: ugarte (---.dyn.optonline.net)
Date: February 08, 2020 09:42PM
that would be better if Colgate didn't scoreTrotsky
Galajda with 0 saves in the first.
___________________________
quality tweets | bluesky (twitter 2) | ALAB Series podcast | Other podcasts and writing
quality tweets | bluesky (twitter 2) | ALAB Series podcast | Other podcasts and writing
Re: 2020-02-08: Cornell 4 Colgate 1
Posted by: upprdeck (38.77.26.---)
Date: February 08, 2020 11:41PM
there barely even carried the puck into the offensive end.. a few high lob passes and a couple times on the PP.. not much else.
Re: 2020-02-08: Cornell 4 Colgate 1
Posted by: scoop85 (---.hvc.res.rr.com)
Date: February 08, 2020 11:48PM
upprdeck
there barely even carried the puck into the offensive end.. a few high lob passes and a couple times on the PP.. not much else.
Looked a lot like our women against Dartmouth today.
Certainly our best overall performance in weeks. If we play again tomorrow like that I’ll feel like we’ve righted the ship which has been listing a bit.
Re: 2020-02-08: Cornell 4 Colgate 1
Posted by: Trotsky (---.washdc.fios.verizon.net)
Date: February 09, 2020 05:06AM
Well, er, yes.ugarte
that would be better if Colgate didn't scoreTrotsky
Galajda with 0 saves in the first.
Re: 2020-02-08: Cornell 4 Colgate 1
Posted by: Jim Hyla (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: February 09, 2020 09:10AM
CBR: Barron Strikes Twice in #2 Men's Hockey's Suffocating 4-1 Win at Colgate
"The Big Red yields just nine shots on goal for the first time since 2009"
Sun: No. 2 Men’s Hockey Smothers Colgate in 1st Game of Home-and-Home, Outscores Raiders 4-1
Colgate: Route 13 Rivalry Renewed
CHN: Roundup: Leonard Puts on a Show in UMass' Sweep UML Keeps Pace; Cornell, Clarkson Steady Atop ECAC
"The Big Red yields just nine shots on goal for the first time since 2009"
Sun: No. 2 Men’s Hockey Smothers Colgate in 1st Game of Home-and-Home, Outscores Raiders 4-1
Colgate: Route 13 Rivalry Renewed
CHN: Roundup: Leonard Puts on a Show in UMass' Sweep UML Keeps Pace; Cornell, Clarkson Steady Atop ECAC
___________________________
"Cornell Fans Made the Timbers Tremble", Boston Globe, March/1970
Cornell lawyers stopped the candy throwing. Jan/2005
"Cornell Fans Made the Timbers Tremble", Boston Globe, March/1970
Cornell lawyers stopped the candy throwing. Jan/2005
Re: 2020-02-08: Cornell 4 Colgate 1
Posted by: upprdeck (38.77.26.---)
Date: February 09, 2020 10:53AM
would love to see what angle the refs had to take away the goal in the 3rd with an offsides.. On the ESPN feed you cant see the puck when the cornell player crosses the line and the next time you see the puck its on the blue line and the player is a ft or so over.. No idea if he went over and pulled it back to the blue line.
I cant believe that ESPN has an app in the browser mode with no slo mo or rewind functions.
I cant believe that ESPN has an app in the browser mode with no slo mo or rewind functions.
Re: 2020-02-08: Cornell 4 Colgate 1
Posted by: scoop85 (---.hvc.res.rr.com)
Date: February 09, 2020 12:09PM
upprdeck
would love to see what angle the refs had to take away the goal in the 3rd with an offsides.. On the ESPN feed you cant see the puck when the cornell player crosses the line and the next time you see the puck its on the blue line and the player is a ft or so over.. No idea if he went over and pulled it back to the blue line.
I cant believe that ESPN has an app in the browser mode with no slo mo or rewind functions.
I replayed that play, and I thought (at full speed) it was likely offside.
Re: 2020-02-08: Cornell 4 Colgate 1
Posted by: upprdeck (38.77.26.---)
Date: February 09, 2020 01:01PM
likely yup.. evidence no. slow it down and you still cant see the puck at the pt he crosses the line from the ESPN main feed. They might have another feed from the other side but we never saw it
in the NHL, a couple weeks ago a goalie made a save, and the glove was on the line.. You could see he glove pocket move well behind the line but as the puck could not be seen it was ruled a save, where as logically you knew it went over the line.
in the NHL, a couple weeks ago a goalie made a save, and the glove was on the line.. You could see he glove pocket move well behind the line but as the puck could not be seen it was ruled a save, where as logically you knew it went over the line.
Re: 2020-02-08: Cornell 4 Colgate 1
Posted by: ice (---.phlapa.fios.verizon.net)
Date: February 09, 2020 01:11PM
Go here:
[www.youtube.com]
Click on the settings icon in the lower right hand corner of the video window and lower the speed to 0.25.
It looked like a good goal to me.
[www.youtube.com]
Click on the settings icon in the lower right hand corner of the video window and lower the speed to 0.25.
It looked like a good goal to me.
Re: 2020-02-08: Cornell 4 Colgate 1
Posted by: Scersk '97 (32.210.48.---)
Date: February 09, 2020 02:08PM
ice
Go here:
[www.youtube.com]
Click on the settings icon in the lower right hand corner of the video window and lower the speed to 0.25.
It looked like a good goal to me.
I very much wanted Lee-hay's goal to count, but I'm going to guess that Barron was drawing the puck across his body within the width of the blue line. Thus, since the entire puck did not enter the zone before Bauld did, the play was offsides. We certainly can't see it from that camera angle; I hope the refs had something better than that with which to make their decision.
Still:
(1) Why is Barron making that move right on the blue line? Details!
(2) Bauld seems to be looking straight at the puck while he's moving into the zone. That makes me wonder. Once again, I hope the refs had a better angle.
(3) The non-goal yet illustrates, once again, my point that I think Leahy brings significant offense to the team when compared against Cairns. He seems to have a very good concept of the "possible" on shots instead of constantly going for the "ideal." I don't think I've seen him nail it into a block in any of his rare appearances this season.
Re: 2020-02-08: Cornell 4 Colgate 1
Posted by: ice (---.phlapa.fios.verizon.net)
Date: February 09, 2020 02:17PM
Scersk '97
...since the entire puck did not enter the zone before Bauld did, the play was offsides...
Ok. I misunderstood the rule book. Thanks.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.