Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by littleredfan
Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: littleredfan (---.resnet.cornell.edu)
Date: February 16, 2002 06:34PM
lets get some game updates here as soon as the game starts up!!! LETS GO RED!!! lets nail those elephant-walkers!!
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: Graham '02 (---.twcny.rr.com)
Date: February 16, 2002 07:02PM
Conschafter is apparently not in net for Vermont tonight.
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: Brunke (216.133.202.---)
Date: February 16, 2002 07:03PM
why does yahoo have the oldies channel on and not the game? HELPPPPPPP
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: Will '01 (---.nyc.rr.com)
Date: February 16, 2002 07:04PM
HELP!!!!
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: Graham '02 (---.twcny.rr.com)
Date: February 16, 2002 07:09PM
Cornell goal, Matt McRae. 1-0
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: KeithK (---.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net)
Date: February 16, 2002 07:09PM
Power play goal puts Cornell up 1-0.
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: Al DeFlorio (---.ne.mediaone.net)
Date: February 16, 2002 07:11PM
1-0 on a CU PP.
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: Brunke (216.133.202.---)
Date: February 16, 2002 07:20PM
2-0 kozier from murray. now also on PP lets get more
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: jy3 (---.twcny.rr.com)
Date: February 16, 2002 07:23PM
3-0 cornell mid first
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: Graham '02 (---.twcny.rr.com)
Date: February 16, 2002 07:24PM
Wieckowski goal, 3-0 Red!!
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: Brunke (216.133.202.---)
Date: February 16, 2002 07:24PM
3-0
I love this GAME
I love this GAME
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.dial.spiritone.com)
Date: February 16, 2002 07:28PM
Goals so far:
4:00 Matt McRae 7 (unassisted) powerplay
9:37 Kozier 5 (Murray)
13:23 Wieckowski 9 (Varteressian, Mark McRae)
4:00 Matt McRae 7 (unassisted) powerplay
9:37 Kozier 5 (Murray)
13:23 Wieckowski 9 (Varteressian, Mark McRae)
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.dial.spiritone.com)
Date: February 16, 2002 07:54PM
Matt McRae from Charlie Cook; 4-0 Cornell.
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: jnachod (---.resnet.cornell.edu)
Date: February 16, 2002 08:03PM
now 5-0! Wow! What are the people gonna think at the other arenas when they announce the scores during intermission?
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: Graham '02 (---.twcny.rr.com)
Date: February 16, 2002 08:04PM
Mark McRae on the powerplay. 5-0 Red.
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: Graham '02 (---.twcny.rr.com)
Date: February 16, 2002 08:05PM
Vermont changes sieves.
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.dial.spiritone.com)
Date: February 16, 2002 08:05PM
4 point night for the twins, so far.
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.dial.spiritone.com)
Date: February 16, 2002 08:15PM
Graham wrote:
He is now.
Conschafter is apparently not in net for Vermont tonight.
He is now.
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: Al DeFlorio (---.ne.mediaone.net)
Date: February 16, 2002 08:25PM
Harvard sucking again, 3-0, at SLU.
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: Chris '02 (---.twcny.rr.com)
Date: February 16, 2002 08:26PM
Cornell 5-1 after two periods
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.dial.spiritone.com)
Date: February 16, 2002 08:27PM
Thus far:
27 Cornell winning
21 Clarkson tied
20 Harvard losing
20 Colgate winning
20 Dartmouth losing
27 Cornell winning
21 Clarkson tied
20 Harvard losing
20 Colgate winning
20 Dartmouth losing
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.dial.spiritone.com)
Date: February 16, 2002 08:47PM
Brown takes the lead at Clarkson (on a short hander), 1-0.
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.dial.spiritone.com)
Date: February 16, 2002 08:55PM
Clarkson and Harvard now each losing by 2.
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.dial.spiritone.com)
Date: February 16, 2002 09:02PM
UVM gets another goal on a 5x3. It's 5-2 with about 6 minutes to go.
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.dial.spiritone.com)
Date: February 16, 2002 09:24PM
Cornell wins 5-2. The McRae bros get Grady's first two stars, Murray the #3.
Great game; now back home to face two north country teams looking for revenge.
Great game; now back home to face two north country teams looking for revenge.
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: Ben Doyle 03 (---.twcny.rr.com)
Date: February 16, 2002 09:25PM
Dave's new numbers should look something like this:
W/L: 9-2, GAA: 1.54, Save %: .930
W/L: 9-2, GAA: 1.54, Save %: .930
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: Jim Hyla (---.twcny.rr.com)
Date: February 16, 2002 09:34PM
Brown wins! CU ties for first at worst, I believe. Then tie breakers. But who cares we are going to win.
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: Jim Hyla (---.twcny.rr.com)
Date: February 16, 2002 09:40PM
Harvard- St. L tie.
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.dial.spiritone.com)
Date: February 16, 2002 09:41PM
> CU ties for first at worst, I believe.
Not quite yet. Standings are:
29 Cornell
22 Dartmouth
with 4 games (8 points) to go.
Not quite yet. Standings are:
29 Cornell
22 Dartmouth
with 4 games (8 points) to go.
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: Jim Hyla (---.twcny.rr.com)
Date: February 16, 2002 09:48PM
Thanks.
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: KeithK (---.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net)
Date: February 16, 2002 09:52PM
We still haven't eliminated Dartmouth, Clarkson or Harvard and have clinched no worse than 3rd since Dartmouth and Clarkson play to close out the season. One point guarantees 2nd while a win Friday wins the RS title. So come on Red! Destroy SLU on Friday and bring home the (first piece of) hardware!
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: ugarte (63.94.240.---)
Date: February 16, 2002 09:55PM
So, I can't find current scores, but someone correct me if wrong:
Cornell beat Vermont;
Dartmouth beat 'Gate;
Brown beat Clarkson;
SLU tied Harvard;
I don't have scores for the Union/RPI games against Princeton/Yale what happened there. (Just to be nice, we should pretend that it matters.)
Cornell beat Vermont;
Dartmouth beat 'Gate;
Brown beat Clarkson;
SLU tied Harvard;
I don't have scores for the Union/RPI games against Princeton/Yale what happened there. (Just to be nice, we should pretend that it matters.)
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: KeithK (---.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net)
Date: February 16, 2002 09:56PM
Cornell 5, Vermont 2
Harvard 3, St. Lawrence 3 (Three thrid period goals by the Crimson to tie.)
Dartmouth 4, Colgate 3 (Green score with 16 ticks left)
Brown 2, Clarkson 0
RPI 5, Yale 2
Princeton 4, Union 2 (I think)
Harvard 3, St. Lawrence 3 (Three thrid period goals by the Crimson to tie.)
Dartmouth 4, Colgate 3 (Green score with 16 ticks left)
Brown 2, Clarkson 0
RPI 5, Yale 2
Princeton 4, Union 2 (I think)
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: ugarte (63.94.240.---)
Date: February 16, 2002 10:01PM
Harvard and Dartmouth suck.
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: Dart~Ben (---.dartmouth.edu)
Date: February 16, 2002 10:25PM
If we suck, then what does that make you after going 0-2 against us?
Congrats on blowing out UVM at the Gut, something I wish Dartmouth could claim on its resume - unfortunatly that was right when Boucher was playing his worst games of the year, letting in 3 really easy goals to lead Dartmouth to a 3-2 loss.
Congrats on blowing out UVM at the Gut, something I wish Dartmouth could claim on its resume - unfortunatly that was right when Boucher was playing his worst games of the year, letting in 3 really easy goals to lead Dartmouth to a 3-2 loss.
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: Al DeFlorio (---.ne.mediaone.net)
Date: February 16, 2002 10:52PM
I think that makes us seven points ahead of you, Ben.
Nice to see you visit here. Got a hunch there'll be a rematch in LP.
Nice to see you visit here. Got a hunch there'll be a rematch in LP.
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: ugarte (63.94.240.---)
Date: February 16, 2002 11:02PM
That's WHY you suck!
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: Ben Doyle 03 (---.twcny.rr.com)
Date: February 17, 2002 03:10AM
ditto
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: Melissa '01 (---.nycap.rr.com)
Date: February 17, 2002 08:02PM
ok. anyone else who went to the games this week-end, please correct me if i am wrong (and i often am), but have you ever seen a team look so deflated/ depressed after winning? maybe (likely) they were just worn out after a long hockey week-end but the fact that the team looked so sullen coming off the ice unsettled (and disappointed) me. anyone know of any reason in particular for this? Losing to Dartmouth (especially in OT) sucked but another loss was more or less due before the end of the season. it doesn't change the fact that overall the team has played well this season. hope that they can put it behind them and concentrate on the upcoming visit by the north country duo.
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: tml5 (---.twcny.rr.com)
Date: February 17, 2002 08:11PM
I think they were upset with losing the Dartmouth game. Based on the huge lead in the first it sounds like the team didn't let it get them down. Losing can do two things: provide motivation or break a team's spirit. I doubt that Cornell, ranked in the top 10, would be broken by a single loss, so I suspect the team as a whole was dejected over the loss and will be super-motivated down the stretch.
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: Christine Quinn '94 (---.bur.adelphia.net)
Date: February 17, 2002 08:18PM
From the Burlington Free Press:
"I think we lost our focus when we got 4-0 or 5-0 or whatever it was," said Schafer. "We don't get up 5-0 very often."
Don't confuse depression with boredom.
"I think we lost our focus when we got 4-0 or 5-0 or whatever it was," said Schafer. "We don't get up 5-0 very often."
Don't confuse depression with boredom.
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: Keith K (---.lmco.com)
Date: February 17, 2002 08:24PM
Also, I can't imagine the team would get really excited about beating up on the doormat of the league. Vermont was a team we absolutely should have beaten, no excuses allowed. So splitting the weekend with a loss in Dartmouth doesn't feel like that much of an accomplishment. (Though in the part of my brain that believes in a finite number of losses that need to be allocated among your games, I wish we had beaten Dartmouth and lost to Vermont...)
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: Jordan 04 (---.resnet.cornell.edu)
Date: February 17, 2002 08:39PM
Well, I think they just realized that they had taken care of business last night, as they should have against Vermont, but there was probably some still some disappointment over not winning "the" game.
There were still some smiles among the group, but after the Saturday game maybe they react to the weekend as a whole, rather than the game of the night. And the weekend, as a whole, was a little disappointing obviously.
A win over #12 just isn't going to be enough to you get you juiced after losing to the #2 team that is constantly knawing at you.
There were still some smiles among the group, but after the Saturday game maybe they react to the weekend as a whole, rather than the game of the night. And the weekend, as a whole, was a little disappointing obviously.
A win over #12 just isn't going to be enough to you get you juiced after losing to the #2 team that is constantly knawing at you.
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: Melissa '01 (---.nycap.rr.com)
Date: February 17, 2002 08:45PM
yeah. the UVM win was more expected than a challenge. i guess i was just of a different mentality - 1 win closer to that elusive RS title (knock on wood) - and thuis excited. either way LGR and go Canada!
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.dial.spiritone.com)
Date: February 18, 2002 01:36AM
I'm with Melissa on this -- after so many accomplishments it's hard to imagine that each win wouldn't be celebrated at this point. The team is 1 win away from accomplishing something that prior to January I would have said would always elude them.
Standards change quickly. An RS title would have been something to call res ipsa loquitor successful just a few months ago.
Standards change quickly. An RS title would have been something to call res ipsa loquitor successful just a few months ago.
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: zg88 (---.twcny.rr.com)
Date: February 18, 2002 08:37AM
A wild guess...
Perhaps the team was upset that (on top of the loss to Dartmouth, of course), after building a 5-0 lead by the middle of the game, they "lost the 2nd half", 2-0. (???)
Perhaps the team was upset that (on top of the loss to Dartmouth, of course), after building a 5-0 lead by the middle of the game, they "lost the 2nd half", 2-0. (???)
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: CowbellGuy (---.biotech.cornell.edu)
Date: February 18, 2002 09:20AM
Prior to January 1? You've been predicting doom and gloom on USCHO right up until about a couple weeks ago...
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: tml5 (---.twcny.rr.com)
Date: February 18, 2002 10:30AM
The secret, Age, is to predict doom and gloom right up until your favorite team wins the championship, and then claim that you knew it all along.
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: Josh '99 (207.10.33.---)
Date: February 18, 2002 10:33AM
Tom Lento wrote:
In that case, you can claim you were anti-woofing.
The secret, Age, is to predict doom and gloom right up until your favorite team wins the championship, and then claim that you knew it all along.
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.metro1.com)
Date: February 18, 2002 01:58PM
> In that case, you can claim you were anti-woofing.
There is a special circle of hell reserved for anti-woofers. It's not nice to try to fool the hockey Gods.
There is a special circle of hell reserved for anti-woofers. It's not nice to try to fool the hockey Gods.
Re: Cornell @ Vermont, Feb 16
Posted by: tml5 (---.twcny.rr.com)
Date: February 18, 2002 07:36PM
Exactly. You think a mere mortal can fool the Hockey Gods?
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.