Officials Protecting their Leagues?
Posted by JDeafv
Officials Protecting their Leagues?
Posted by: JDeafv (---.hsd1.in.comcast.net)
Date: January 06, 2013 09:23PM
In light of Schafer complaining about WCHA protecting their league and making stuff up, I took a look to see if there is any truth to this matter. A little analysis is dangerous, but here goes nothing. A few notes: includes 164 non-conference (nc) games with boxes available that are non-tournament games where the home team league is assumed to have provided the officials. Excludes common league opponents playing in NC games. PPO = power play opportunities.
This would suggest the ECAC is the worst offender. The ECAC gives their league an average of 1.23 more PPO / game when playing a NC opponent. The only league that is not biased would be Atlantic Hockey which appears to hate their teams.
Ok, but is this any different from the way penalties are called in the league? "D" mean Delta in the header.
This is a little weird. It suggests at home AH and HE schools are penalized less vs NC school whereas CCHA, ECAC and WCHA are penalized slightly more. All leagues except AH enjoy more PPO / game as the home team in NC games than they typically get in conference with ECAC being the worst again. As the visitor in NC games, CCHA and WCHA teams are penalized less than in conference, but HE, AH and ECAC are penalized more. The CCHA, ECAC and HE get fewer PPO / game on the road in NC games than in conference, but the WCHA and AH teams enjoy more PPO/game - including the WCHA that average 1 additional PPO / game as the visitor in NC games!
I'm sure there is some better analysis to be done (none of this takes the variance into account - how are PIM distributed anyway?!?!), but perhaps this is interesting to some people.
Here's some of the "raw" data (rows are visiting teams, columns are home teams):
A note on the raw data is that in EVERY league, the home team enjoys more PPO and fewer PIM!
@ Home Against NC Team NC Oppontents Apparent Protection Bias Average PIM PPO / Game Average PIM PPO / Game Average PIM PPO / Game AH 9.41 3.70 9.97 3.96 -0.55 -0.26 CCHA 12.72 4.47 14.04 4.07 -1.32 0.40 ECAC 12.93 5.03 14.38 3.81 -1.44 1.23 HE 10.98 4.74 11.48 4.45 -0.50 0.29 WCHA 13.28 3.87 14.20 3.44 -0.92 0.43
This would suggest the ECAC is the worst offender. The ECAC gives their league an average of 1.23 more PPO / game when playing a NC opponent. The only league that is not biased would be Atlantic Hockey which appears to hate their teams.
Ok, but is this any different from the way penalties are called in the league? "D" mean Delta in the header.
In Conference @ Home v NC Team On Road v NC Team @ Home v NC Team On Road v NC Team PIM PPO PIM PPO PIM PPO D PIM D PPO D PIM D PPO AH 10.96 3.89 9.41 3.70 11.43 3.79 -1.54 -0.19 2.02 0.10 CCHA 12.54 4.17 12.72 4.47 10.15 3.83 0.18 0.31 -2.57 -0.64 ECAC 12.82 4.17 12.93 5.03 13.71 4.19 0.12 0.86 0.78 -0.85 HE 12.87 4.37 10.98 4.74 16.56 3.58 -1.89 0.38 5.58 -1.16 WCHA 12.94 3.81 13.28 3.87 12.58 4.86 0.35 0.06 -0.70 1.00
This is a little weird. It suggests at home AH and HE schools are penalized less vs NC school whereas CCHA, ECAC and WCHA are penalized slightly more. All leagues except AH enjoy more PPO / game as the home team in NC games than they typically get in conference with ECAC being the worst again. As the visitor in NC games, CCHA and WCHA teams are penalized less than in conference, but HE, AH and ECAC are penalized more. The CCHA, ECAC and HE get fewer PPO / game on the road in NC games than in conference, but the WCHA and AH teams enjoy more PPO/game - including the WCHA that average 1 additional PPO / game as the visitor in NC games!
I'm sure there is some better analysis to be done (none of this takes the variance into account - how are PIM distributed anyway?!?!), but perhaps this is interesting to some people.
Here's some of the "raw" data (rows are visiting teams, columns are home teams):
164 Non-Conference Games Played V/H AH CCHA ECAC HE WCHA Ind AH - 11 19 7 2 - CCHA 4 - 6 1 12 - ECAC 7 8 1 16 10 - HE - 2 9 - 9 - WCHA 1 7 3 4 - 2 Ind 9 2 4 2 6 - NC Visit Team PIM / Game V/H AH CCHA ECAC HE WCHA Ind AH - 14.36 10.21 12.14 9 - CCHA 4 - 9 14 13.58 - ECAC 9.86 16.13 - 10.75 18.1 - HE - 12 21 - 16.67 - WCHA 10 18.71 18.67 9.5 - 6 Ind 16 9 13 11 13.67 - NC Home Team PIM / Game V/H AH CCHA ECAC HE WCHA Ind AH - 14.55 9.32 13.14 10 - CCHA 7 - 10.17 12 11.5 - ECAC 10.43 14.25 - 10.25 14.9 - HE - 13.5 19.67 - 16 - WCHA 10 15.29 16 9.5 - 20.5 Ind 10.22 6 9.5 10 14 - NC Visit Team PPO / Game V/H AH CCHA ECAC HE WCHA Ind AH - 4.27 3.89 4 3 - CCHA 3.25 - 3.33 5 3.75 - ECAC 4.14 5.5 - 3.5 3.6 - HE - 3.5 4.56 - 2.67 - WCHA 5 4.57 4 4.75 - 6 Ind 3.44 2.5 3.25 5 4.17 - NC Home Team PPO / Game V/H AH CCHA ECAC HE WCHA Ind AH - 4.55 4.42 3.57 2.5 - CCHA 2 - 4 6 4.42 - ECAC 4 4.88 5 4.13 3.8 - HE - 3.5 - - 4.44 - WCHA 5 5.43 8 4.5 - 3 Ind 3.78 4 3.75 5.5 4.17 - Conference Games Played V/H AH CCHA ECAC HE WCHA Ind AH 65 - - - - - CCHA - 72 - - - - ECAC - - 48 - - - HE - - - 56 - - WCHA - - - - 82 - Ind - - - - - - Conf Visit Team PIM / Game V/H AH CCHA ECAC HE WCHA Ind AH 11.83 - - - - - CCHA - 13.46 - - - - ECAC - - 13.25 - - - HE - - - 12.98 - - WCHA - - - - 12.99 - Ind - - - - - - Conf Home Team PIM / Game V/H AH CCHA ECAC HE WCHA Ind AH 10.08 - - - - - CCHA - 11.61 - - - - ECAC - - 12.38 - - - HE - - - 12.75 - - WCHA - - - - 12.88 - Ind - - - - - - Conf Visit Team PPO / Game V/H AH CCHA ECAC HE WCHA Ind AH 3.68 - - - - - CCHA - 4.01 - - - - ECAC - - 3.94 - - - HE - - - 4.27 - - WCHA - - - - 3.63 - Ind - - - - - - Conf Home Team PPO / Game V/H AH CCHA ECAC HE WCHA Ind AH 4.09 - - - - - CCHA - 4.32 - - - - ECAC - - 4.4 - - - HE - - - 4.46 - - WCHA - - - - 3.98 - Ind - - - - - -
A note on the raw data is that in EVERY league, the home team enjoys more PPO and fewer PIM!
Re: Officials Protecting their Leagues?
Posted by: Jim Hyla (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: January 06, 2013 09:39PM
Wow, too much time, but interesting.
___________________________
"Cornell Fans Made the Timbers Tremble", Boston Globe, March/1970
Cornell lawyers stopped the candy throwing. Jan/2005
"Cornell Fans Made the Timbers Tremble", Boston Globe, March/1970
Cornell lawyers stopped the candy throwing. Jan/2005
Re: Officials Protecting their Leagues?
Posted by: billhoward (---.hsd1.nj.comcast.net)
Date: January 06, 2013 10:02PM
Nice (and thanks for the explanations for those who had couldn't follow the data without a lot of study). Nate Silver, watch your rearview mirror. Someone is gaining on you.
Re: Officials Protecting their Leagues?
Posted by: Trotsky (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net)
Date: January 07, 2013 05:23AM
Super cool! Thanks!!!
Re: Officials Protecting their Leagues?
Posted by: MattS (---.nys.biz.rr.com)
Date: January 07, 2013 08:48AM
I think, and I could very well be wrong, that the AHA and ECAC use some of the same officials. Or at least they use to. What that might do to the conclusions I am not sure.
Re: Officials Protecting their Leagues?
Posted by: JDeafv (---.hsd1.in.comcast.net)
Date: January 07, 2013 09:02AM
MattS
I think, and I could very well be wrong, that the AHA and ECAC use some of the same officials. Or at least they use to. What that might do to the conclusions I am not sure.
It makes things look even worse for the ECAC. Excluding AH-ECAC games from the analysis on the assumption the officials shouldn't have a league bias because they come from both leagues shifts the ECAC "apparent bias" to even more protecting - with an average of 1.4 additional PPO / game when an ECAC team plays at home against a NC opponent. In addition, AH appears to hate their teams even more.
Apparent Protection Bias Average PIM PPO / Game AH -0.93 -0.30 ECAC -1.58 1.40
Re: Officials Protecting their Leagues?
Posted by: ursusminor (---.washdc.east.verizon.net)
Date: January 07, 2013 09:56AM
Isn't part of the reason that AHA teams get more penalties at home NC games than the opponents get, the fact that the opponents are usually the better teams and do not need to hack as much?
Re: Officials Protecting their Leagues?
Posted by: Trotsky (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net)
Date: January 07, 2013 10:08AM
ursusminor
Isn't part of the reason that AHA teams get more penalties at home NC games than the opponents get, the fact that the opponents are usually the better teams and do not need to hack as much?
There could be a similar effect due to home ice (correlating with "native" officials).
Re: Officials Protecting their Leagues?
Posted by: JDeafv (---.hsd1.in.comcast.net)
Date: January 07, 2013 10:27AM
Thanks for the nice comments! Kinda fun to look at this and here's another take:
Each league appears to have a home team bias. Meaning home team is getting more PPO and less PIM per game. So, shouldn't this continue for NC games? Is it any worse when a NC opponents come to town?
By my calculation, this makes the ECAC stand out even worse. The home team bias nearly accounts for the NC bias in PPO/game in the CCHA (additional 0.09), HE (additional 0.10) and WCHA (additional 0.08), because those officials appear to just favor the home teams consistently in those leagues regardless if the visitor is NC. However, the ECAC averages an additional 0.77 PPO/game more for league teams against NC teams.
As @ursusminor pointed out, the discrepancy in AH bias might be more structural and related not to officials, but the talent level of the teams. This suggest that lumping together the different NC opponents isn't a very good thing to do, but small sample size makes analysis of individual pairs of conferences unreliable (for example, only 1 AH team hosted a WCHA team).
Edit: make clear the home and visitor columns are for in-league games. I think this is the analysis @Trotsky is suggesting in the previous post (this was started before I saw that post).
Each league appears to have a home team bias. Meaning home team is getting more PPO and less PIM per game. So, shouldn't this continue for NC games? Is it any worse when a NC opponents come to town?
In Leauge Home In-League Visitor In-League Home Protection Bias Home Team Tack-On Bias v NC Average PIM PPO / Game Average PIM PPO / Game Average PIM PPO / Game Average PIM PPO / Game AH 10.08 4.09 11.83 3.68 -1.75 0.41 1.20 -0.67 CCHA 11.61 4.32 13.46 4.01 -1.85 0.31 0.53 0.09 ECAC 12.38 4.4 13.25 3.94 -0.87 0.46 -0.57 0.77 HE 12.75 4.46 12.98 4.27 -0.23 0.19 -0.27 0.10 WCHA 12.88 3.98 12.99 3.63 -0.11 0.35 -0.81 0.08
By my calculation, this makes the ECAC stand out even worse. The home team bias nearly accounts for the NC bias in PPO/game in the CCHA (additional 0.09), HE (additional 0.10) and WCHA (additional 0.08), because those officials appear to just favor the home teams consistently in those leagues regardless if the visitor is NC. However, the ECAC averages an additional 0.77 PPO/game more for league teams against NC teams.
As @ursusminor pointed out, the discrepancy in AH bias might be more structural and related not to officials, but the talent level of the teams. This suggest that lumping together the different NC opponents isn't a very good thing to do, but small sample size makes analysis of individual pairs of conferences unreliable (for example, only 1 AH team hosted a WCHA team).
Edit: make clear the home and visitor columns are for in-league games. I think this is the analysis @Trotsky is suggesting in the previous post (this was started before I saw that post).
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/07/2013 10:29AM by JDeafv.
Re: Officials Protecting their Leagues?
Posted by: jtn27 (---.nycmny.fios.verizon.net)
Date: January 07, 2013 12:11PM
One possibility (that I have no real support for) could be that refs in some leagues more strictly enforce penalties than refs in other leagues. If the ECAC refs are less strict, ECAC players become conditioned to assume they will get away with more borderline actions. On the other hand, if WCHA refs are strict, WCHA players will focus more on avoiding penalties. As a result, ECAC team look less disciplined when playing WCHA teams with WCHA refs.
___________________________
Class of 2013
Class of 2013
Re: Officials Protecting their Leagues?
Posted by: ursusminor (---.washdc.east.verizon.net)
Date: January 07, 2013 12:43PM
The ECAC refs seem more random than the other leagues' refs in calling penalties.jtn27
One possibility (that I have no real support for) could be that refs in some leagues more strictly enforce penalties than refs in other leagues. If the ECAC refs are less strict, ECAC players become conditioned to assume they will get away with more borderline actions. On the other hand, if WCHA refs are strict, WCHA players will focus more on avoiding penalties. As a result, ECAC team look less disciplined when playing WCHA teams with WCHA refs.
Re: Officials Protecting their Leagues?
Posted by: css228 (---.hsd1.pa.comcast.net)
Date: January 07, 2013 01:11PM
The ECAC refs seem more incompetent than the other leagues' refs in calling penaltiesursusminor
The ECAC refs seem more random than the other leagues' refs in calling penalties.jtn27
One possibility (that I have no real support for) could be that refs in some leagues more strictly enforce penalties than refs in other leagues. If the ECAC refs are less strict, ECAC players become conditioned to assume they will get away with more borderline actions. On the other hand, if WCHA refs are strict, WCHA players will focus more on avoiding penalties. As a result, ECAC team look less disciplined when playing WCHA teams with WCHA refs.
Re: Officials Protecting their Leagues?
Posted by: jtn27 (---.nycmny.fios.verizon.net)
Date: January 07, 2013 02:04PM
ursusminor
The ECAC refs seem more random than the other leagues' refs in calling penalties.jtn27
One possibility (that I have no real support for) could be that refs in some leagues more strictly enforce penalties than refs in other leagues. If the ECAC refs are less strict, ECAC players become conditioned to assume they will get away with more borderline actions. On the other hand, if WCHA refs are strict, WCHA players will focus more on avoiding penalties. As a result, ECAC team look less disciplined when playing WCHA teams with WCHA refs.
Randomness by the refs could contribute to a more cavalier attitude by the players, I guess. If an ECAC ref only calls a certain type of penalty 60% of the time it occurs versus 90% by a ref in another league, the ECAC players would probably be more likely to commit the penalty because they think they can get away with it. (Although I'm sure css228 will tell me that I'm being generous by assuming ECAC refs get the call right more than 20% of the time.)
___________________________
Class of 2013
Class of 2013
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.