ECAC Final Seedings
Posted by ZooeyDog
ECAC Final Seedings
Posted by: ZooeyDog (---.ne.client2.attbi.com)
Date: March 01, 2003 09:35PM
According to the most awesome and excellent TBRW?:
1 Cornell
2 Harvard
3 Dartmouth
4 Yale
5 Brown
6 Union
7 Clarkson
8 Colgate
9 St. Lawrence
10 Vermont
11 RPI
12 Princeton
Meaning, first round affairs:
Princeton at Brown
RPI at Union
Vermont at Clarkson
St. Lawrence at Colgate
ZD
1 Cornell
2 Harvard
3 Dartmouth
4 Yale
5 Brown
6 Union
7 Clarkson
8 Colgate
9 St. Lawrence
10 Vermont
11 RPI
12 Princeton
Meaning, first round affairs:
Princeton at Brown
RPI at Union
Vermont at Clarkson
St. Lawrence at Colgate
ZD
Re: ECAC Final Seedings
Posted by: Luke 05 (---.twcny.rr.com)
Date: March 01, 2003 09:37PM
This means we play winner of SLU(t) and Colgate(tm) right?
Re: ECAC Final Seedings
Posted by: ZooeyDog (---.ne.client2.attbi.com)
Date: March 01, 2003 09:39PM
We play the lowest remaining seed. If all the other faves win, we get SLU/Colgate.
ZD
ZD
Re: ECAC Final Seedings
Posted by: DeltaOne81 (---.resnet.cornell.edu)
Date: March 01, 2003 10:27PM
I'll toss this on here as an end of the regular season fact...
Conference Pts (39) - Conference GA (29) = 10!!!
not only that, but
Conference Pts (39) - OVERALL GA (39) = 0!!!
In addition, in case your wondering, of the teams we could end up facing in the quarters (Colgate -> Princeton), Colgate has the highest RPIStr by a decent margain. So, RPI-wise at least, we'd like to play them.
Conference Pts (39) - Conference GA (29) = 10!!!
not only that, but
Conference Pts (39) - OVERALL GA (39) = 0!!!
In addition, in case your wondering, of the teams we could end up facing in the quarters (Colgate -> Princeton), Colgate has the highest RPIStr by a decent margain. So, RPI-wise at least, we'd like to play them.
Re: ECAC Final Seedings
Posted by: JMSMilr02 (---.sd.sd.cox.net)
Date: March 02, 2003 12:03PM
When was the last time the top five seeds at the end of the season were Ivies?
Re: ECAC Final Seedings
Posted by: kingpin248 (---.cshl.org)
Date: March 02, 2003 12:32PM
John Stead asks:
[Q]When was the last time the top five seeds at the end of the season were Ivies?[/Q]
Prior to this year, the Ivies had never held the top four seeds in the tournament. They had the top three in 85/86 (Harvard, Yale, Cornell).
[Q]When was the last time the top five seeds at the end of the season were Ivies?[/Q]
Prior to this year, the Ivies had never held the top four seeds in the tournament. They had the top three in 85/86 (Harvard, Yale, Cornell).
Re: ECAC Final Seedings
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.dial.spiritone.com)
Date: March 02, 2003 03:55PM
Just having Clarkson out of the top 5 alone is a rare event.
Re: ECAC Final Seedings
Posted by: Al DeFlorio (---.ne.client2.attbi.com)
Date: March 02, 2003 08:16PM
Greg wrote:
Let's hope the situation gets resolved soon. The ECAC needs its perennial national contenders strong.
Extenuating circumstances this year, I regret to say, for Clarkson.
Just having Clarkson out of the top 5 alone is a rare event.
Let's hope the situation gets resolved soon. The ECAC needs its perennial national contenders strong.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.