Cornell 2 Princeton 1

Starters:

Collins-Kennedy-Mowrey
Brisson-D'Agostino
Garman

Different gender, but depleted women's team leads Yale 3-0 on second-period even-strength goals by Rebecca Johnston (2) and Hayley Hughes. Shots 23-8 Cornell with six minutes to go in the second. Johnston has seven SOG.

Yikes, shots at Princeton are 14-3 Princeton after first period.

Collins puts Cornell up 1-0 on the pp.

Trotsky
Collins puts Cornell up 1-0 on the pp.

Causing Princeton's livestats to freeze immediately.

Another opportunity to hold a third period lead (tenuous as it is).

Shots 33-10 through 2 periods.

Women up 5-0 mid-third; hat trick for Johnston.

Stop me if you've heard this before. Tigers tie it at 18:12 of the third.

D'AGOSTINO!!!!!! 2-1 at 18:43.

Wow!

And BIG RED win it! Yeah !!!! LGR

Shots were 40-21. God bless Mike Garman.

Well, it's not snowoing in Las Vegas right now, but on the whole I'd rather have been at Hobey's place. This is really true: a late goal wins not loses for Cornell? Awesome.

So, any reason I should keep my Princeton video for the rest of the month, or cancel it now?

Jim Hyla
So, any reason I should keep my Princeton video for the rest of the month, or cancel it now?

Don't you want to watch the tigers whoop Colgate?

Rita

Jim Hyla
So, any reason I should keep my Princeton video for the rest of the month, or cancel it now?

Don't you want to watch the tigers whoop Colgate?

I do, but that's on ESPNU.

Great job by the men to bounce back and take the lead again immediately after Princeton tied it (on what was a fluky goal, a shot through traffic took a deflection somewhere and rainbowed up and in). Garman played a very good game - I wouldn't necessarily say a *great* game, only because I don't know that he made many spectacular saves, if any, but he did make *all* the easy saves. He really was not at fault at all on the Princeton goal.

Thank you Garman and D'Ag!!! On to Quinnipiac!

Josh '99
Great job by the men to bounce back and take the lead again immediately after Princeton tied it (on what was a fluky goal, a shot through traffic took a deflection somewhere and rainbowed up and in). Garman played a very good game - I wouldn't necessarily say a *great* game, only because I don't know that he made many spectacular saves, if any, but he did make *all* the easy saves. He really was not at fault at all on the Princeton goal.

Basically this. To amplify, I began to feel very "comfortable" with Garman for the same reason Josh mentioned, that he was making all the easy saves. That's a basis for a defensive strategy, the "rope-a-dope" that we used to play with Clarkson back in the 90s. Let them take all the outside tosses they want, gobble up the rebounds, win faceoffs, and then turn the other way.

Scersk '97

Josh '99
Great job by the men to bounce back and take the lead again immediately after Princeton tied it (on what was a fluky goal, a shot through traffic took a deflection somewhere and rainbowed up and in). Garman played a very good game - I wouldn't necessarily say a *great* game, only because I don't know that he made many spectacular saves, if any, but he did make *all* the easy saves. He really was not at fault at all on the Princeton goal.

Basically this. To amplify, I began to feel very "comfortable" with Garman for the same reason Josh mentioned, that he was making all the easy saves. That's a basis for a defensive strategy, the "rope-a-dope" that we used to play with Clarkson back in the 90s. Let them take all the outside tosses they want, gobble up the rebounds, win faceoffs, and then turn the other way.

Right, that was also what made Leneveu great: not that he made amazing saves, but that he almost never missed the straightforward ones. It meant the opposition had to do something special to even have a chance of scoring.

jtwcornell91

Scersk '97

Josh '99
Great job by the men to bounce back and take the lead again immediately after Princeton tied it (on what was a fluky goal, a shot through traffic took a deflection somewhere and rainbowed up and in). Garman played a very good game - I wouldn't necessarily say a *great* game, only because I don't know that he made many spectacular saves, if any, but he did make *all* the easy saves. He really was not at fault at all on the Princeton goal.

Basically this. To amplify, I began to feel very "comfortable" with Garman for the same reason Josh mentioned, that he was making all the easy saves. That's a basis for a defensive strategy, the "rope-a-dope" that we used to play with Clarkson back in the 90s. Let them take all the outside tosses they want, gobble up the rebounds, win faceoffs, and then turn the other way.

Right, that was also what made Leneveu great: not that he made amazing saves, but that he almost never missed the straightforward ones. It meant the opposition had to do something special to even have a chance of scoring.

And the opposite is what happened to McKee. He could be spectacular, but in his last year began to miss some routine ones.