Wednesday, May 15th, 2024
 
 
 
Updates automatically
Twitter Link
CHN iOS App
 
NCAA
1967 1970

ECAC
1967 1968 1969 1970 1973 1980 1986 1996 1997 2003 2005 2010

IVY
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1977 1978 1983 1984 1985 1996 1997 2002 2003 2004 2005 2012 2014

Cleary Jell-O Mold
2002 2003 2005

Ned Harkness Cup
2003 2005 2008 2013
 
Brendon
Iles
Pokulok
Schafer
Syphilis

ECAC Media and Coaches polls

Posted by nyc94 
ECAC Media and Coaches polls
Posted by: nyc94 (---.cable.mindspring.com)
Date: September 21, 2010 02:18PM

Apologies if this has already been posted.
[www.dailygazette.com]

First-place votes in parentheses
Coaches
1. Yale (11) 121
2. Cornell (1) 92
3. Union 86
4. RPI 79
5. Colgate 69
6. Dartmouth 67
7. Harvard 62
8. Quinnipiac 54
9. St. Lawrence 52
10. Princeton 43
11. Brown 34
12. Clarkson 33

Media
1. Yale (25) 354
2. Cornell (2) 288
3. Union (1) 276
4. Colgate (2) 263
5. RPI 211
6. Dartmouth 188
7. St. Lawrence 172
8. Quinnipiac 142
9. Princeton 135
10. Harvard 120
11. Brown 118
12. Clarkson 82
 
Re: ECAC Media and Coaches polls
Posted by: nyc94 (---.cable.mindspring.com)
Date: September 21, 2010 02:22PM

[www.unionathletics.com]

Coaches’ Preseason All-Conference Team:
Goaltender - A. York, Rensselaer
Defense – G. Hughes, St. Lawrence
Defense – E. Stephens, Dartmouth
Forward – B. Little, Yale
Forward – C. Polacek, Rensselaer
Forward – A. Smith, Colgate
 
Re: ECAC Media and Coaches polls
Posted by: pfibiger (---.se.biz.rr.com)
Date: September 21, 2010 02:44PM

From a post on USCHO, the media went with Keith Kincaid in goal and Nick D'Agostino instead of George Hughes on defense for the preseason all-league team.

 
___________________________
Phil Fibiger '01
[www.fibiger.org]
 
Re: ECAC Media and Coaches polls
Posted by: scoop85 (173.84.100.---)
Date: September 21, 2010 03:46PM

Given all the offense we've lost -- not to mention the ECAC's top goalie -- it's rather surprising that we're ranked so high. I look at it as the ultimate compliment to Schafer's coaching.
 
Re: ECAC Media and Coaches polls
Posted by: Trotsky (---.dc.dc.cox.net)
Date: September 21, 2010 04:22PM

scoop85
Given all the offense we've lost -- not to mention the ECAC's top goalie -- it's rather surprising that we're ranked so high. I look at it as the ultimate compliment to Schafer's coaching.
Could also be a reflection of a down year for the league. Or maybe the voters just aren't thinking about it that hard. ;-)
 
Re: ECAC Media and Coaches polls
Posted by: Beeeej (Moderator)
Date: September 21, 2010 04:51PM

Trotsky
scoop85
Given all the offense we've lost -- not to mention the ECAC's top goalie -- it's rather surprising that we're ranked so high. I look at it as the ultimate compliment to Schafer's coaching.
Could also be a reflection of a down year for the league. Or maybe the voters just aren't thinking about it that hard. ;-)

Perhaps they looked at the six goal-scorers from the ECAC semis and finals and realized only one of them left?

(I doubt it, but it's still nice to think about.)

 
___________________________
Beeeej, Esq.

"Cornell isn't an organization. It's a loose affiliation of independent fiefdoms united by a common hockey team."
- Steve Worona
 
Re: ECAC Media and Coaches polls
Posted by: Chris 02 (---.jsc.nasa.gov)
Date: September 22, 2010 01:23PM

Can someone explain how they got the points in the coaches poll?

My usual take is if there are 12 places in the poll, a 1st place vote is worth 12 pts, 2nd is worth 11 pts, and so on.

Yale got 11 first place votes, which is 132 pts > 121 (printed number).

About the only way I could suggest this is if this poll is skewed (1st place worth 11, and last place vote = zero), Yale would get 11 first place votes and one last place vote. This would work if all the coaches submitted a poll with only 11 teams (and didn't even rank their own team for example).
 
Re: ECAC Media and Coaches polls
Posted by: ursusminor (---.nrl.navy.mil)
Date: September 22, 2010 02:03PM

Your last statement is essentially correct. Each of the coaches submitted a ballot with only 11 teams not including their own school.
 
Re: ECAC Media and Coaches polls
Posted by: KeithK (---.external.lmco.com)
Date: September 22, 2010 02:41PM

...which means that 1st place is worth 11 points and last place (11th on the ballot) is worth 1.
 
Re: ECAC Media and Coaches polls
Posted by: David Harding (---.hsd1.il.comcast.net)
Date: September 22, 2010 10:44PM

For what it's worth, there is an error somewhere in the reported numbers for the media poll. There are 30 participants, based on the 30 first place votes cast. If voting is based on a 12 to 1 scale, the total of all points should be
30*(12+11+10+...+1) = 30*(12*13/2) = 2340. Add up the numbers and you get 2349.
 
Re: ECAC Media and Coaches polls
Posted by: Jim Hyla (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: September 23, 2010 02:37PM

David Harding
For what it's worth, there is an error somewhere in the reported numbers for the media poll. There are 30 participants, based on the 30 first place votes cast. If voting is based on a 12 to 1 scale, the total of all points should be
30*(12+11+10+...+1) = 30*(12*13/2) = 2340. Add up the numbers and you get 2349.
Too much free time.

 
___________________________
"Cornell Fans Made the Timbers Tremble", Boston Globe, March/1970
Cornell lawyers stopped the candy throwing. Jan/2005
 
Re: ECAC Media and Coaches polls
Posted by: billhoward (---.hsd1.nj.comcast.net)
Date: September 23, 2010 08:58PM

David Harding
... the total of all points should be 30*(12+11+10+...+1) = 30*(12*13/2) = 2340. Add up the numbers and you get 2349.
Chicago just reported in.
 

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login