Sunday, April 28th, 2024
 
 
 
Updates automatically
Twitter Link
CHN iOS App
 
NCAA
1967 1970

ECAC
1967 1968 1969 1970 1973 1980 1986 1996 1997 2003 2005 2010

IVY
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1977 1978 1983 1984 1985 1996 1997 2002 2003 2004 2005 2012 2014

Cleary Spittoon
2002 2003 2005

Ned Harkness Cup
2003 2005 2008 2013
 
Brendon
Iles
Pokulok
Schafer
Syphilis

1980 Hockey Team

Posted by Craine 
1980 Hockey Team
Posted by: Craine (---.nyc.rr.com)
Date: February 08, 2002 11:31PM

Damn... That was cool....
 
Re: 1980 Hockey Team
Posted by: Josh '99 (---.stny.rr.com)
Date: February 09, 2002 01:58AM

Yo, you're right, that was awesome.
 
Re: 1980 Hockey Team
Posted by: AdamGanderson (---.syr.edu)
Date: February 09, 2002 11:45AM

Just in case any of you don't know what the esteemed Mr. Craine is talking about:

[sports.yahoo.com]

 
Re: 1980 Hockey Team
Posted by: Craine (---.nyc.rr.com)
Date: February 09, 2002 03:24PM

Cool... I've always wanted to be esteemed nut
 
Re: 1980 Hockey Team
Posted by: Robb (---.156.78.127.dial1.dallas1.level3.net)
Date: February 09, 2002 08:37PM

Just want to pat myself on the back a bit - as soon as Dorothy Hammill and Dick Butthead, er, Button carried the torch into the arena, I said to my wife, "I bet Eruzione gets to light it." Swear to Harkness.

 
Re: 1980 Hockey Team
Posted by: Al DeFlorio (---.ne.mediaone.net)
Date: February 10, 2002 02:45PM

The 1960 gold medal hockey team was honored at a dinner in Salt Lake City last night.

Jack Riley, their coach, lives across the street. He can be ornery--kinda like Ned--and has always felt his team's accomplishment is undervalued compared with the 1980 team. Likely the result of TV, Al Michaels, and the increased visibility of hockey in the US in 1980 (only the six original NHL teams in 1960, IIRC).

 
Re: 1980 Hockey Team
Posted by: ugarte (---.ipt.aol.com)
Date: February 10, 2002 03:19PM

The 1960 team is undervalued compared to the 1980 team. I don't think the 1960 team deserves to be relegated in that way, but I think the most important factor is being left out: how familiar the audience was with Tretiak, KLM, etc.

From my too-young-to-remember-1980-very-well-either eyes, the N.A. audience "knew" the 1980 Soviet team better than the 1960 audience "knew" the 1960 Soviet team. IIRC, North America had gotten to see the Soviets take on the best the NHL had to offer in the Canada Cup. In 1980, we thought that we were playing a team that had proven itself worthy of competing for, if not winning, a Stanley Cup if they were to join the NHL as a franchise. And in the Olympics, they were going to play a bunch of college kids.

I get the sense that in 1960 everyone knew that we had pulled off an upset, but only because the papers said so - not because the audience (as opposed to the cognoscenti) really knew how good the opposition was.
 
Re: 1980 Hockey Team
Posted by: Al DeFlorio (---.ne.mediaone.net)
Date: February 10, 2002 06:07PM

Very true, apple. Probably the best indication anyone had of the strength of the Russians--at least to those who paid attention to such things in 1960--was their 18-1 win over Riley's US team the year before.

 
Re: 1980 Hockey Team
Posted by: jy3 (---.twcny.rr.com)
Date: February 10, 2002 07:00PM

yeah i predicted eruzione to light it about half way thru the opening ceremonies :-) who else would have gotten the torch?
nut

 
Re: 1980 Hockey Team
Posted by: AdamGanderson (---.syr.edu)
Date: February 11, 2002 03:19PM

I firmly believe the word "cognoscenti" should be used far more often. It might just make this forum a better place. : )

 

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login