Friday, May 9th, 2025
 
 
CHN iOS App
 
NCAA
1967 1970

ECAC
1967 1968 1969 1970 1973 1980 1986 1996 1997 2003 2005 2010 2024

IVY
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1977 1978 1983 1984 1985 1996 1997 2002 2003 2004 2005 2012 2014 2018 2019 2020 2023 2024

Cleary Spittoon
2002 2003 2005 2018 2019 2020

Ned Harkness Cup
2003 2005 2008 2013
 
Brendon
Iles
Pokulok
Schafer
Syphilis

NCAAs quarterfinal Cornell vs. BU

Posted by 617BigRed 
Page: Previous1234567 8 
Current Page: 8 of 8
Re: NCAAs quarterfinal Cornell vs. BU
Posted by: VIEWfromK (172.56.68.---)
Date: April 15, 2025 07:16AM

fastforward

The Walsh face mask penalty was completely bogus

The rule couldn't be more cut and dry. You can't grab a facemask. It doesn't matter the scenario that leads up to it. We learned earlier in the season that it won't be tolerated. I don't think it's a play that should be an automatic major but it's what the rule book calls for.
 
Re: NCAAs quarterfinal Cornell vs. BU
Posted by: jtwcornell91 (Moderator)
Date: April 15, 2025 01:13PM

VIEWfromK
fastforward

The Walsh face mask penalty was completely bogus

The rule couldn't be more cut and dry. You can't grab a facemask. It doesn't matter the scenario that leads up to it. We learned earlier in the season that it won't be tolerated. I don't think it's a play that should be an automatic major but it's what the rule book calls for.

I think if they'd called it on the ice they would have given one of the two Terriers double-teaming him a minor, but since it was a replay challenge, they could only assess the major.

 
___________________________
JTW

@jtwcornell91@hostux.social
 
Re: NCAAs quarterfinal Cornell vs. BU
Posted by: VIEWfromK (172.56.69.---)
Date: April 15, 2025 02:24PM

jtwcornell91

I think if they'd called it on the ice they would have given one of the two Terriers double-teaming him a minor, but since it was a replay challenge, they could only assess the major.

I don't think anything would have come of that get together if not for the facemask. Walsh would have been better off with a punch than what he did do
 
Re: NCAAs quarterfinal Cornell vs. BU
Posted by: stereax (---)
Date: April 15, 2025 02:28PM

we're all talking about the facemask call but how about yegorov and lachance double-teaming kraft, literally throwing him to the ice, and no penalty being called on that? that's much more egregious of a missed call. the facemask sucks but that's how it is in the rulebook :/
 
Re: NCAAs quarterfinal Cornell vs. BU
Posted by: upprdeck (---.syrcny.fios.verizon.net)
Date: April 15, 2025 06:45PM

Calling it vs the Rule is the major problem

Its one thing to miss am elbow that knocks someone silly and replay to call it

Its another thing to call a facemask play like that as a major unless the tugging is egregious. Its a bad rule

Especially when punching is not allowed and when was the last time you saw them review those randomly other than when its a complete scrum?
 
Re: NCAAs quarterfinal Cornell vs. BU
Posted by: Scersk '97 (216.49.132.---)
Date: April 16, 2025 09:37AM

upprdeck
Calling it vs the Rule is the major problem

Its one thing to miss am elbow that knocks someone silly and replay to call it

Its another thing to call a facemask play like that as a major unless the tugging is egregious. Its a bad rule

Especially when punching is not allowed and when was the last time you saw them review those randomly other than when its a complete scrum?

The correct call was to call the facemask penalty and then "find" another major to call.

Basically, "Yep, you got your timeout back because technically there was a facemask there, but don't pull that crap again."
 
Re: NCAAs quarterfinal Cornell vs. BU
Posted by: stereax (---.cit.cornell.edu)
Date: April 16, 2025 10:41AM

Scersk '97
upprdeck
Calling it vs the Rule is the major problem

Its one thing to miss am elbow that knocks someone silly and replay to call it

Its another thing to call a facemask play like that as a major unless the tugging is egregious. Its a bad rule

Especially when punching is not allowed and when was the last time you saw them review those randomly other than when its a complete scrum?

The correct call was to call the facemask penalty and then "find" another major to call.

Basically, "Yep, you got your timeout back because technically there was a facemask there, but don't pull that crap again."
or even 5 for facemask and a minor for roughing
 
Re: NCAAs quarterfinal Cornell vs. BU
Posted by: jtwcornell91 (Moderator)
Date: April 22, 2025 12:31PM

stereax
Scersk '97
upprdeck
Calling it vs the Rule is the major problem

Its one thing to miss am elbow that knocks someone silly and replay to call it

Its another thing to call a facemask play like that as a major unless the tugging is egregious. Its a bad rule

Especially when punching is not allowed and when was the last time you saw them review those randomly other than when its a complete scrum?

The correct call was to call the facemask penalty and then "find" another major to call.

Basically, "Yep, you got your timeout back because technically there was a facemask there, but don't pull that crap again."
or even 5 for facemask and a minor for roughing

That was my point; unfortunately they can't call a minor based on a replay, but I like Scott's idea of calling 5 for "contact to the head roughing" or some such.

 
___________________________
JTW

@jtwcornell91@hostux.social
 
Page: Previous1234567 8 
Current Page: 8 of 8

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login