Wednesday, February 5th, 2025
 
 
CHN iOS App
 
NCAA
1967 1970

ECAC
1967 1968 1969 1970 1973 1980 1986 1996 1997 2003 2005 2010 2024

IVY
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1977 1978 1983 1984 1985 1996 1997 2002 2003 2004 2005 2012 2014 2018 2019 2020 2023 2024

Cleary Bedpan
2002 2003 2005 2018 2019 2020

Ned Harkness Cup
2003 2005 2008 2013
 
Brendon
Iles
Pokulok
Schafer
Syphilis

2025-02-01 at Clarkson

Posted by Trotsky 
Page: Previous1 2 
Current Page: 2 of 2
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: stereax (172.56.4.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 08:36PM

Trotsky
stereax
SEVEN GOALS PER GAME???

Yup.
Wow...
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: Trotsky (185.169.0.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 08:39PM

stereax
Christ almighty...
Now show her the PIM...
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: Trotsky (185.169.0.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 08:40PM

Ping
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: stereax (172.56.4.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 08:41PM

Trotsky
stereax
Christ almighty...
Now show her the PIM...
Haha no I know a lot of games were goonfests at that time...
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: fastforward (---.hsd1.nj.comcast.net)
Date: February 01, 2025 08:42PM

Novel concept-PP with shots on net
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: stereax (172.56.4.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 08:42PM

fastforward
Novel concept-PP with shots on net
We can do that?
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: fastforward (---.hsd1.nj.comcast.net)
Date: February 01, 2025 08:42PM

stereax
fastforward
Novel concept-PP with shots on net
We can do that?
Not enough
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: Trotsky (185.169.0.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 08:44PM

PP has been good tonight, just no love.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: stereax (172.56.4.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 08:45PM

fastforward
stereax
fastforward
Novel concept-PP with shots on net
We can do that?
Not enough
I think we should get the women's team to drill the men about the powerplay until they get it through their head that they're allowed to have a decent one. Just a suggestion...
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: Trotsky (185.169.0.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 08:46PM

Pretty moves by Mack.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: fastforward (---.hsd1.nj.comcast.net)
Date: February 01, 2025 08:54PM

Sloppy passing
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: Trotsky (185.169.0.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 08:55PM

Both teams with some heedless but fun end to end. Somebody is going to make a dumb mistake.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: stereax (172.56.4.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 08:57PM

Trotsky
Both teams with some heedless but fun end to end. Somebody is going to make a dumb mistake.
What we call a "track meet". Away from my screen rn, are we still tied?
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: Trotsky (185.169.0.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 08:57PM

Yes, still 3-3.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: stereax (172.56.4.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 08:59PM

Sweet, okay. Sounded like a goal from where I was.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: fastforward (---.hsd1.nj.comcast.net)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:01PM

Grrrrrrrrr
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: Scersk '97 (104.28.55.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:01PM

Crap call considering what’s gone uncalled prior.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: Trotsky (185.169.0.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:02PM

Now would be a really nice time for a slapshot from the point, blocked, turned to a breakaway and a shorty.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: Scersk '97 (104.28.55.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:06PM

J.F. is… not svelte.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: Trotsky (185.169.0.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:09PM

Wow, where do I get a Richardson? That was great.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: Trotsky (185.169.0.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:11PM

Hope Walsh is ok.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: stereax (172.56.4.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:11PM

Trotsky
Wow, where do I get a Richardson? That was great.
PC Richard and Sons?
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: stereax (172.56.4.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:12PM

Trotsky
Hope Walsh is ok.
Shit, shit, shit
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: sah67 (---.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:15PM

Did we just have three D out there on that face off?
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: Trotsky (185.169.0.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:16PM

FFS
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: RichH (104.28.85.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:17PM

Trotsky
FFS

The discipline
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: sah67 (---.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:17PM

Dumb retaliation by Bancroft but somehow avoids getting penalized.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: Trotsky (185.169.0.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:18PM

Let's take the cheese.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: Trotsky (185.169.0.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:18PM

I thought they could onlly give 5 on a review?
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: sah67 (---.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:19PM

And now they’re going to review for…a major on Bancroft? It was idiotic but seemed like a minor roughing call at best.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: stereax (172.56.4.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:19PM

sah67
Did we just have three D out there on that face off?
We are playing 10 D tonight, so...
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: Trotsky (185.169.0.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:20PM

That's gotta be a major. :-(
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: sah67 (---.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:21PM

stereax
sah67
Did we just have three D out there on that face off?
We are playing 10 D tonight, so...

Rego just trying to pad his faceoff stats.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: Trotsky (185.169.0.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:21PM

OK, fucking win it.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: stereax (172.56.4.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:22PM

sah67
stereax
sah67
Did we just have three D out there on that face off?
We are playing 10 D tonight, so...

Rego just trying to pad his faceoff stats.
Insert the guy tapping on his head and smirking gif here.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: Trotsky (185.169.0.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:23PM

Castagna never does anything. Only 2 offensive zone faceoff wins in the last 30 seconds.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: stereax (172.56.4.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:24PM

Trotsky
Castagna never does anything. Only 2 offensive zone faceoff wins in the last 30 seconds.
Scrub. Demote him to the practice squad. Rayhill clears.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: Scersk '97 (104.28.55.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:25PM

DJ was just waiting for his chance! Gotta spin some metal!

It’s deranged. Two bands in the house.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: BearLover (---.sub-174-229-92.myvzw.com)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:25PM

The 3 D taking a faceoff in OT had to have been a mistake, that’s why Stanley was arguing.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: sah67 (---.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:29PM

Suda’s shootout streak ends on a poke check.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: Trotsky (185.169.0.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:29PM

2 point weekend. I'll take it.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: sah67 (---.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:30PM

“Cornell thinks they won it.” Clarkson announcer guy really paying attention.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: fastforward (---.hsd1.nj.comcast.net)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:30PM

Announcer:
Cornell thinks they won
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: stereax (172.56.4.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:31PM

We think, therefore we did...
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: stereax (172.56.4.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:31PM

Trotsky
2 point weekend. I'll take it.
2 is fine given the everything going on. Not ideal, but it is what it is. Get healthy, get unsuspended, and get back to it.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: sah67 (---.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:33PM

Not that 3x3 OT is ever my cup of tea, but that one was particularly putrid.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: BearLover (---.sub-174-229-92.myvzw.com)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:36PM

Trotsky
2 point weekend. I'll take it.
Not a good result for getting the bye particularly because Clarkson also got a point.

It’s promising that Shane has started to play well.

I guess we’re never getting Devlin and Wallace back?

Touching interview at the very end with the Clarkson captain who showed a ton of class and spoke really well. Even after he taunted the Cornell bench after scoring in the shootout.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: Trotsky (185.169.0.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:37PM

In a game I am sure very few of you care about, Dartmouth loses to Princeton and Cornell stays in the Ivy title race.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: stereax (172.56.4.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:38PM

BearLover
Trotsky
2 point weekend. I'll take it.
Not a good result for getting the bye particularly because Clarkson also got a point.
Bud, at this point I think we're all kinda in the understanding that we're probably not getting a bye and it is what it is. If we do, swell, but it's not terribly likely.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: stereax (172.56.4.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:38PM

Trotsky
In a game I am sure very few of you care about, Dartmouth loses to Princeton and Cornell stays in the Ivy title race.
GOOD. Fuck em. Are they also running frankenlines like we are?
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: Trotsky (185.169.0.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:40PM

stereax
Trotsky
In a game I am sure very few of you care about, Dartmouth loses to Princeton and Cornell stays in the Ivy title race.
GOOD. Fuck em. Are they also running frankenlines like we are?
It adds perspective that, down their suspensions, Dartmouth was swept, at home.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/01/2025 09:42PM by Trotsky.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: RichH (104.28.85.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:41PM

Trotsky
2 point weekend. I'll take it.

Back when all wins were 2 points and Houle was a player, 2 points in the North Country was a reason for celebration.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: BearLover (---.sub-174-229-92.myvzw.com)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:41PM

stereax
BearLover
Trotsky
2 point weekend. I'll take it.
Not a good result for getting the bye particularly because Clarkson also got a point.
Bud, at this point I think we're all kinda in the understanding that we're probably not getting a bye and it is what it is. If we do, swell, but it's not terribly likely.
The bye is the only material thing we’re playing for at this point in the regular season (I guess other than the Ivy title). So that’s the focus. It’s also not a terribly unrealistic goal given the teams ahead of us have tough remaining schedules. We basically need to pass two of Clarkson, Dartmouth, Union, Colgate.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/01/2025 09:43PM by BearLover.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: Trotsky (185.169.0.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:45PM

BearLover
I guess we’re never getting Devlin and Wallace back?
Schafer has been bearish on them returning since their injuries. I think it is probably best to assume they are gone for the season. Even if they are ready for the playoffs they will have missed an entire year of training and development. Even if fit they won't be the best options.

Injuries suck.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/01/2025 09:46PM by Trotsky.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: BearLover (---.sub-174-229-92.myvzw.com)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:46PM

Trotsky
BearLover
I guess we’re never getting Devlin and Wallace back?
Schafer has been bearish on them returning since their injuries. I think it is probably best to assume they are gone for the season. Even if the were ready for the playoffs they would have missed an entire year of development.

Injuries suck.
For awhile Schafer had been saying the hope or maybe even expectation was that everyone would be back in January.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: Trotsky (185.169.0.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:48PM

BearLover
Trotsky
BearLover
I guess we’re never getting Devlin and Wallace back?
Schafer has been bearish on them returning since their injuries. I think it is probably best to assume they are gone for the season. Even if the were ready for the playoffs they would have missed an entire year of development.

Injuries suck.
For awhile Schafer had been saying the hope or maybe even expectation was that everyone would be back in January.
I don't believe so. The assumptions for some players did slide, from before Christmas to after Christmas to early February. But I swear he has always thrown cold water on Devlin. Wallace I can't say, but I don't remember any encouraging noises.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: BearLover (---.sub-174-229-92.myvzw.com)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:48PM

Trotsky
In a game I am sure very few of you care about, Dartmouth loses to Princeton and Cornell stays in the Ivy title race.
It looks like Dartmouth is 5-2 in Ivy play with games remaining against H,Y,B. Cornell is 4-2-2 with games against Y,B. We basically need H to beat Dartmouth and then we and Dartmouth would be virtually tied.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: Iceberg (172.56.223.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:49PM

Trotsky
In a game I am sure very few of you care about, Dartmouth loses to Princeton and Cornell stays in the Ivy title race.

The one game where Thompson doesn't feel like an empty wind tunnel
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: andyw2100 (---.res.spectrum.com)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:52PM

stereax
BearLover
Trotsky
2 point weekend. I'll take it.
Not a good result for getting the bye particularly because Clarkson also got a point.
Bud, at this point I think we're all kinda in the understanding that we're probably not getting a bye and it is what it is. If we do, swell, but it's not terribly likely.

I wouldn't say that. (I am an optimist.)

The teams tied for third ahead of us are ahead of us by five points. We have eight games left to play...24 possible points. One of those two teams is Union, and we play them twice. The other team tied for third is Dartmouth, and they've played one more game than we have.

I say it's at least 50-50 (remember...optimist here) that we earn the bye.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: BearLover (---.sub-174-229-92.myvzw.com)
Date: February 01, 2025 09:57PM

andyw2100
stereax
BearLover
Trotsky
2 point weekend. I'll take it.
Not a good result for getting the bye particularly because Clarkson also got a point.
Bud, at this point I think we're all kinda in the understanding that we're probably not getting a bye and it is what it is. If we do, swell, but it's not terribly likely.

I wouldn't say that. (I am an optimist.)

The teams tied for third ahead of us are ahead of us by five points. We have eight games left to play...24 possible points. One of those two teams is Union, and we play them twice. The other team tied for third is Dartmouth, and they've played one more game than we have.

I say it's at least 50-50 (remember...optimist here) that we earn the bye.
It’s under 50-50, particularly given how badly we’ve played, but the odds aren’t horrible. Union and Clarkson have difficult remaining schedules and Dartmouth has played an extra game. Most of the teams ahead of us have to play each other (and us) several times.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: upprdeck (---.syrcny.fios.verizon.net)
Date: February 01, 2025 10:00PM

o fer the weekend on the PP and the breakaways. the difference between 6 and 2 pts
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: billhoward (---.oakpure.com)
Date: February 01, 2025 10:07PM

sah67
“Cornell thinks they won it.” Clarkson announcer guy really paying attention.
Um, maybe he's been been blinded by the light of his color guy's jacket.

This pattern harks back to the tartan slacks (more red black brown than green, tho) worn with leather jackets by NHL players in the '70s and in Slapshot.

Mom is no longer helping him dress. I hope to God this is not a Clarkson reunion year blazer. It would be okay as the lining.

 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: BearLover (---.sub-174-229-92.myvzw.com)
Date: February 01, 2025 10:09PM

upprdeck
o fer the weekend on the PP and the breakaways. the difference between 6 and 2 pts
Cornell PP (10.9%) is third worst in the country.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: stereax (172.56.4.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 10:11PM

Trotsky
stereax
Trotsky
In a game I am sure very few of you care about, Dartmouth loses to Princeton and Cornell stays in the Ivy title race.
GOOD. Fuck em. Are they also running frankenlines like we are?
It adds perspective that, down their suspensions, Dartmouth was swept, at home.
HAH. Again. Fuck em, I say :)
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: Dafatone (---.sub-174-215-244.myvzw.com)
Date: February 01, 2025 10:19PM

stereax
Trotsky
stereax
Trotsky
In a game I am sure very few of you care about, Dartmouth loses to Princeton and Cornell stays in the Ivy title race.
GOOD. Fuck em. Are they also running frankenlines like we are?
It adds perspective that, down their suspensions, Dartmouth was swept, at home.
HAH. Again. Fuck em, I say :)

That's the spirit!
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: arugula (---.s2163.c3-0.avec-cbr2.nyr-avec.ny.cable.rcncustomer.com)
Date: February 01, 2025 10:54PM


Was Murray injured against at. Lawrence?
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: marty (---.res.spectrum.com)
Date: February 01, 2025 10:55PM

Trotsky
I thought they could onlly give 5 on a review?

I just looked for this again. The rule changed before the season started. I thought they could call a minor on video review if not called on the ice but what this says is that the refs can wipe out a major penalty or downgrade a major to a minor. I don't read this as stating that a minor can be called on video review if no penalty was called on the ice - but that is what I thought some articles had said in September. It also seems that the officials can wipe out a major but not a minor.screwy

NCAA
When using video replay, officials will have the ability to review a major penalty and downgrade it to a minor penalty or no penalty. Officials can add to a major penalty during the review (game misconduct or disqualification).

The off season changes.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: arugula (---.s2163.c3-0.avec-cbr2.nyr-avec.ny.cable.rcncustomer.com)
Date: February 01, 2025 10:58PM

stereax
Trotsky
Castagna never does anything.
Never.

I really upset you guys. Sorry.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: arugula (---.s2163.c3-0.avec-cbr2.nyr-avec.ny.cable.rcncustomer.com)
Date: February 01, 2025 11:02PM

Trotsky
Castagna never does anything. Only 2 offensive zone faceoff wins in the last 30 seconds.

I’m apparently living rent free in your head. I’ll remember to never criticize any Cornell player ever again. JC has two non empty goals this year. Nominate him for the hobey baker.

Please also note, I said at the beginning that JC is good on face offs.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/01/2025 11:08PM by arugula.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: RichH (104.28.48.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 11:05PM

billhoward
sah67
“Cornell thinks they won it.” Clarkson announcer guy really paying attention.
Um, maybe he's been been blinded by the light of his color guy's jacket.

This pattern harks back to the tartan slacks (more red black brown than green, tho) worn with leather jackets by NHL players in the '70s and in Slapshot.

Mom is no longer helping him dress. I hope to God this is not a Clarkson reunion year blazer. It would be okay as the lining.

Every Canadian who makes it to the booth thinks they're Don Cherry.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: Trotsky (185.169.0.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 11:15PM

arugula
Trotsky
Castagna never does anything. Only 2 offensive zone faceoff wins in the last 30 seconds.

I’m apparently living rent free in your head.
You said a dumb thing one would expect on reddit. This is not, or at least was not, the place for that kind of lofo effort.

Be better.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: Trotsky (185.169.0.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 11:19PM

RichH
billhoward
sah67
“Cornell thinks they won it.” Clarkson announcer guy really paying attention.
Um, maybe he's been been blinded by the light of his color guy's jacket.

This pattern harks back to the tartan slacks (more red black brown than green, tho) worn with leather jackets by NHL players in the '70s and in Slapshot.

Mom is no longer helping him dress. I hope to God this is not a Clarkson reunion year blazer. It would be okay as the lining.

Every Canadian who makes it to the booth thinks they're Don Cherry.

I was thinking Lindsey Nelson.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: BearLover (---.sub-174-229-92.myvzw.com)
Date: February 01, 2025 11:23PM

Trotsky
arugula
Trotsky
Castagna never does anything. Only 2 offensive zone faceoff wins in the last 30 seconds.

I’m apparently living rent free in your head.
You said a dumb thing one would expect on reddit. This is not, or at least was not, the place for that kind of lofo effort.

Be better.
He said a totally reasonable thing, and moreover it was his own opinion on an internet hockey forum. Who cares?
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: Trotsky (185.169.0.---)
Date: February 01, 2025 11:27PM

BearLover
Who cares?

Yes, arguing with a fool is not worth further keystr
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: arugula (---.s2163.c3-0.avec-cbr2.nyr-avec.ny.cable.rcncustomer.com)
Date: February 01, 2025 11:46PM

Trotsky
BearLover
Who cares?

Yes, arguing with a fool is not worth further keystr

Weren’t you the guy in the other chat lecturing people to behave themselves?
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: arugula (---.s2163.c3-0.avec-cbr2.nyr-avec.ny.cable.rcncustomer.com)
Date: February 01, 2025 11:50PM

Trotsky
arugula
Trotsky
Castagna never does anything. Only 2 offensive zone faceoff wins in the last 30 seconds.

I’m apparently living rent free in your head.
You said a dumb thing one would expect on reddit. This is not, or at least was not, the place for that kind of lofo effort.

Be better.


What are you my mother? Be better? I offered an opinion about a seemingly underperforming hockey player which seems to have really bothered you.

Last time you slandered me because I deigned to defend urban living. Next time I suspect you’ll argue with me when I suggest that the sky is blue.

JC has two goals. Never mind. All Cornell players are all-stars.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: BearLover (---.sub-174-229-92.myvzw.com)
Date: February 01, 2025 11:54PM

Trotsky
BearLover
Who cares?

Yes, arguing with a fool is not worth further keystr
A poster on a hockey forum called the most talented and highest drafted player on the team a disappointment because that player has scored two goals the whole season and is averaging under half a point per game and now you’re calling the poster names lol
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: ice (---.phlapa.fios.verizon.net)
Date: February 02, 2025 04:35AM

Castagna has outstanding hockey sense and he is only 19. There are things that don't show up as stats.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: arugula (---.s2163.c3-0.avec-cbr2.nyr-avec.ny.cable.rcncustomer.com)
Date: February 02, 2025 08:22AM

ice
Castagna has outstanding hockey sense and he is only 19. There are things that don't show up as stats.

For sure. Lots of upside. But I’m not sure why saying that a scorer not scoring is disappointing struck a nerve or is controversial. A team full of guys with outstanding hockey sense who never score won’t cut it.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: BearLover (---.sub-174-229-92.myvzw.com)
Date: February 02, 2025 10:41AM

I’m pretty sure if you asked Castagna himself, he’d tell you this has been a really tough year and that he isn’t happy with his own play. He’d probably agree with arugula that his season has been a colossal disappointment. The extreme visceral reaction on this forum whenever anybody says something negative about the team is getting weird at this point. arugula’s post was obviously premised on Castagna being supremely talented and capable of much more. Which is true, and which is why his lack of production has been shocking.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: stereax (---.static.firstlight.net)
Date: February 02, 2025 12:47PM

BearLover
I’m pretty sure if you asked Castagna himself, he’d tell you this has been a really tough year and that he isn’t happy with his own play. He’d probably agree with arugula that his season has been a colossal disappointment. The extreme visceral reaction on this forum whenever anybody says something negative about the team is getting weird at this point. arugula’s post was obviously premised on Castagna being supremely talented and capable of much more. Which is true, and which is why his lack of production has been shocking.
I think part of the counterargument, though, is that Castagna, as one of the players expected to be the best on the team, gets matched to much harder competition than others on the team. At this point, though, I'm mostly just considering the entire regular season a bit of a wash and hoping we get hot down the stretch and into the playoffs. Everyone's injured, sick, suspended, or some combination of the three, and it's difficult to accurately judge a team when so much is going on behind the scenes that we're not even aware about. Hopefully Castagna kicks it up a notch for the playoffs.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: Snowball (---.nycmny.fios.verizon.net)
Date: February 02, 2025 08:09PM

Curious to know what people in this forum think about the 2 Friday night suspended guys being responsible for 4 of the 7 points in total on Saturday - Stanley with the 1st goal and O'Leary with an assist on all 3 goals.


Should strategic suspensions be a part of Cornell's game plans??!?
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: fastforward (---.hsd1.nj.comcast.net)
Date: February 02, 2025 08:45PM

Snowball
Curious to know what people in this forum think about the 2 Friday night suspended guys being responsible for 4 of the 7 points in total on Saturday - Stanley with the 1st goal and O'Leary with an assist on all 3 goals.


Should strategic suspensions be a part of Cornell's game plans??!?

Haha-a definite no for me
Perhaps the extra days rest and/or the wrath of Schaf spurred them
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: BearLover (---.sub-174-229-76.myvzw.com)
Date: February 02, 2025 10:06PM

adamw
BearLover
On the Clarkson Hockey Roundtable (thanks ugarte for reminding me as to the existence of this website), the posters have been celebrating Casey’s departure and are very optimistic about their new coach. While Casey was there they consistently called for his firing. The posters criticize Casey for “dump and chase hockey” and are thrilled with their new coach’s “possession” style. They also still blame Casey for the losses this season, under the logic that the new coach inherited his players.

The “dump and chase” criticism is pretty funny. Casey certainly understands dump and chase hockey is not a high percentage play, and I’m sure his teams were doing it out of necessity rather than as a strategy. But the posters are under the impression dump and chase was Casey’s preferred style.

Casey had more success at Clarkson than any coach there since the '90s, when the landscape was VASTLY different. There are no shortage of delusional, ignorant fans on any team's message board/thread. Clarkson will be lucky to have a program in 5 years.
News of this post has made its way over to the Clarkson Hockey Roundtable…
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: Trotsky (---.washdc.fios.verizon.net)
Date: February 03, 2025 12:10AM

Snowball
Curious to know what people in this forum think about the 2 Friday night suspended guys being responsible for 4 of the 7 points in total on Saturday - Stanley with the 1st goal and O'Leary with an assist on all 3 goals.

I think we could have used them Friday.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: Snowball (---.nycmny.fios.verizon.net)
Date: February 03, 2025 08:46AM

Well definitely we could have used them Friday.

I was thinking more in terms of motivation. Remember when Schaf took Ben Berard out of the line-up for a Friday game and then Berard scored a hat trick the next night:

[cornellbigred.com]
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: stereax (---.static.firstlight.net)
Date: February 03, 2025 09:08AM

Snowball
Well definitely we could have used them Friday.

I was thinking more in terms of motivation. Remember when Schaf took Ben Berard out of the line-up for a Friday game and then Berard scored a hat trick the next night:

[cornellbigred.com]
For sure. I think the cocktail of fight + suspension + getting kicked in the nuts by SLU will do that.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: BearLover (---.sub-174-229-76.myvzw.com)
Date: February 03, 2025 11:07AM

No. Not the brawl, not losing to StL, not anything, is going to inspire this team to turn its season around. There have been countless impetuses to do that already, and it has never happened. Clearly it’s not lack of inspiration or desire to win that explains the lack of results. It’s talent, coaching, and execution that is going to determine whether this team can turn things around. The brawl did nothing for this team other than cost them at least one game this past weekend.
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 02/03/2025 11:20AM by BearLover.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: Snowball (---.nycmny.fios.verizon.net)
Date: February 03, 2025 12:19PM

Ouch
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: BearLover (---.sub-174-229-83.myvzw.com)
Date: February 03, 2025 12:42PM

Snowball
Ouch
Sorry, that was overly harsh. I just don’t see it happening. If losing the last game of first semester to Colgate or losing 4-0 to ASU or losing to Sacred Heart didn’t light a fire, nothing is going to. I also don’t buy the premise that a fire needs to be lit in the first place.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: Snowball (---.nycmny.fios.verizon.net)
Date: February 03, 2025 01:19PM

No worries. Though it's usually only my father-on-law who can be so pessimistic:

Father-in-law: Don't you think we are leaving a terrible, horrible world for your kids?
Me: No, cancer will be cured in their lifetime

Bearlover, you be you, I'll continue to be Pollyanna:
- get more players back,
- get the powerplay going,
- Shane continues excellent play...

Ergo: ECAC tournament, Great end of season.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: billhoward (---.oakpure.com)
Date: February 03, 2025 02:38PM

Trotsky
Snowball
Curious to know what people in this forum think about the 2 Friday night suspended guys being responsible for 4 of the 7 points in total on Saturday - Stanley with the 1st goal and O'Leary with an assist on all 3 goals.
I think we could have used them Friday.
I added the AI enhancer and it suggested: Make no changes to the Trotsky typeface. Sarcasm Font came through as DataClass|Implied.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: BearLover (---.sub-174-229-83.myvzw.com)
Date: February 03, 2025 03:01PM

Snowball
No worries. Though it's usually only my father-on-law who can be so pessimistic:

Father-in-law: Don't you think we are leaving a terrible, horrible world for your kids?
Me: No, cancer will be cured in their lifetime

Bearlover, you be you, I'll continue to be Pollyanna:
- get more players back,
- get the powerplay going,
- Shane continues excellent play...

Ergo: ECAC tournament, Great end of season.
Oh, I don’t really disagree that we may well improve and go on a run, but I don’t think it will be because a brawl or loss lit a fire under the team.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: Snowball (---.nycmny.fios.verizon.net)
Date: February 03, 2025 03:22PM

Got it.

Let's Go Red!
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: VIEWfromK (172.56.64.---)
Date: February 04, 2025 10:25AM

Snowball

I was thinking more in terms of motivation. Remember when Schaf took Ben Berard out of the line-up for a Friday game and then Berard scored a hat trick the next night:

I have seen this go the other way though too. In 2012-13 (our most recent disappointing regular season?) after a Friday OT loss to top ten ranked Yale, Schafer benched leading scorer Greg Miller and they went out and played a lifeless 3-0 game in a home loss against Brown. It was one time where I was furious at a Schafer decision.
 
Re: 2025-02-01 at Clarkson
Posted by: Iceberg (172.56.221.---)
Date: February 04, 2025 10:40AM

VIEWfromK
Snowball

I was thinking more in terms of motivation. Remember when Schaf took Ben Berard out of the line-up for a Friday game and then Berard scored a hat trick the next night:

I have seen this go the other way though too. In 2012-13 (our most recent disappointing regular season?) after a Friday OT loss to top ten ranked Yale, Schafer benched leading scorer Greg Miller and they went out and played a lifeless 3-0 game in a home loss against Brown. It was one time where I was furious at a Schafer decision.

I've forgotten a lot about that season for good reason. That was the start of some mediocre years that didn't really end until some better players emerged (Angello, Vanderlaan, Kaldis, etc.) along with the shift in playing style.
 
Page: Previous1 2 
Current Page: 2 of 2

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login