2025-02-01 at Clarkson

Clearly, the problem this year has been me not starting threads. The Times regrets the error.

Let's Go Red!

Trotsky
Clearly, the problem this year has been me not starting threads. The Times regrets the error.

Let's Go Red!

Let's Go Red!!! Will probably watch on ESPN - I think the team itself is cursed, not me watching away games...

Shake off last night and put it to Clarkson!

From College Hockey News:

Mike Schafer apparently back behind the bench tonight for Cornell at Clarkson after serving a suspension last night. ... Kyle Penney and Ondrej Psenicka remain out, along with four other injured forwards -- three others who sat last night are back in.

On the Clarkson Hockey Roundtable (thanks ugarte for reminding me as to the existence of this website), the posters have been celebrating Casey’s departure and are very optimistic about their new coach. While Casey was there they consistently called for his firing. The posters criticize Casey for “dump and chase hockey” and are thrilled with their new coach’s “possession” style. They also still blame Casey for the losses this season, under the logic that the new coach inherited his players.

The “dump and chase” criticism is pretty funny. Casey certainly understands dump and chase hockey is not a high percentage play, and I’m sure his teams were doing it out of necessity rather than as a strategy. But the posters are under the impression dump and chase was Casey’s preferred style.

Handy list of teams we wish ill on:

Drt 26 Prn
Cgt 26 @ SLU
Clk 24 Cor
Hvd 22 pulling the maid
Uni 23 Brn

We have 19 points.

fastforward
From College Hockey News:

Mike Schafer apparently back behind the bench tonight for Cornell at Clarkson after serving a suspension last night. ... Kyle Penney and Ondrej Psenicka remain out, along with four other injured forwards -- three others who sat last night are back in.

DeSantis, O'Leary, and...Stanley?

BearLover
On the Clarkson Hockey Roundtable (thanks ugarte for reminding me as to the existence of this website), the posters have been celebrating Casey’s departure and are very optimistic about their new coach. While Casey was there they consistently called for his firing. The posters criticize Casey for “dump and chase hockey” and are thrilled with their new coach’s “possession” style. They also still blame Casey for the losses this season, under the logic that the new coach inherited his players.

The “dump and chase” criticism is pretty funny. Casey certainly understands dump and chase hockey is not a high percentage play, and I’m sure his teams were doing it out of necessity rather than as a strategy. But the posters are under the impression dump and chase was Casey’s preferred style.

Casey had more success at Clarkson than any coach there since the '90s, when the landscape was VASTLY different. There are no shortage of delusional, ignorant fans on any team's message board/thread. Clarkson will be lucky to have a program in 5 years.

Trotsky

fastforward
From College Hockey News:

Mike Schafer apparently back behind the bench tonight for Cornell at Clarkson after serving a suspension last night. ... Kyle Penney and Ondrej Psenicka remain out, along with four other injured forwards -- three others who sat last night are back in.

DeSantis, O'Leary, and...Stanley?

Here’s Hoping!

adamw
Clarkson will be lucky to have a program in 5 years.

I assume because D-3 in other sports? I sure hope not. Denver, CC, NoDak and others in the same boat IINM.

adamw

BearLover
On the Clarkson Hockey Roundtable (thanks ugarte for reminding me as to the existence of this website), the posters have been celebrating Casey’s departure and are very optimistic about their new coach. While Casey was there they consistently called for his firing. The posters criticize Casey for “dump and chase hockey” and are thrilled with their new coach’s “possession” style. They also still blame Casey for the losses this season, under the logic that the new coach inherited his players.

The “dump and chase” criticism is pretty funny. Casey certainly understands dump and chase hockey is not a high percentage play, and I’m sure his teams were doing it out of necessity rather than as a strategy. But the posters are under the impression dump and chase was Casey’s preferred style.

Casey had more success at Clarkson than any coach there since the '90s, when the landscape was VASTLY different. There are no shortage of delusional, ignorant fans on any team's message board/thread. Clarkson will be lucky to have a program in 5 years.

Perhaps, but they managed to hire away from the AHL a seemingly very good coach who is evidently recruiting well with his connections in Quebec/major juniors.

Trotsky

adamw
Clarkson will be lucky to have a program in 5 years.

I assume because D-3 in other sports? I sure hope not. Denver, CC, NoDak and others in the same boat IINM.

Denver and NoDak are D1 across the board

scoop85

Trotsky

adamw
Clarkson will be lucky to have a program in 5 years.

I assume because D-3 in other sports? I sure hope not. Denver, CC, NoDak and others in the same boat IINM.

Denver and NoDak are D1 across the board

Thanks.

Per Schafer: Psenicka, Penney and Donaldson could be back next week; with Major back the following week.

Still no sign of Devin. Perhaps it is time to think about him petitioning the Ivies for another year.

scoop85

Trotsky

adamw
Clarkson will be lucky to have a program in 5 years.

I assume because D-3 in other sports? I sure hope not. Denver, CC, NoDak and others in the same boat IINM.

Denver and NoDak are D1 across the board

But, very relevantly, mid-major in football and basketball, so their athletic departments don’t have excess revenue to throw around for “revenue sharing.”

BearLover

adamw

BearLover
On the Clarkson Hockey Roundtable (thanks ugarte for reminding me as to the existence of this website), the posters have been celebrating Casey’s departure and are very optimistic about their new coach. While Casey was there they consistently called for his firing. The posters criticize Casey for “dump and chase hockey” and are thrilled with their new coach’s “possession” style. They also still blame Casey for the losses this season, under the logic that the new coach inherited his players.

The “dump and chase” criticism is pretty funny. Casey certainly understands dump and chase hockey is not a high percentage play, and I’m sure his teams were doing it out of necessity rather than as a strategy. But the posters are under the impression dump and chase was Casey’s preferred style.

Casey had more success at Clarkson than any coach there since the '90s, when the landscape was VASTLY different. There are no shortage of delusional, ignorant fans on any team's message board/thread. Clarkson will be lucky to have a program in 5 years.

Perhaps, but they managed to hire away from the AHL a seemingly very good coach who is evidently recruiting well with his connections in Quebec/major juniors.

Because he's an alum. And Casey has a long history of being one of the top recruiters around. But really, I don't know why I'm engaging with you, since you will always twist everything imaginable to fit your gloom and doom narrartive. Someone take away my keyboard.

BearLover

scoop85

Trotsky

adamw
Clarkson will be lucky to have a program in 5 years.

I assume because D-3 in other sports? I sure hope not. Denver, CC, NoDak and others in the same boat IINM.

Denver and NoDak are D1 across the board

But, very relevantly, mid-major in football and basketball, so their athletic departments don’t have excess revenue to throw around for “revenue sharing.”

They have the exact opposite issue to what you believe. Denver doesn't even have a football program - which is a positive. They may have less revenue, but it also means they don't need to throw $20 million in revenue sharing at it. Listen to my recent podcast with Denver AD Josh Berlo.

Denver will have just as much money as any Big Ten school to devote to paying hockey players. Michigan, for example, is capped at $22 million to spend. How much of that will go to hockey? More than likely, less than what Denver will spend.

adamw

BearLover

adamw

BearLover
On the Clarkson Hockey Roundtable (thanks ugarte for reminding me as to the existence of this website), the posters have been celebrating Casey’s departure and are very optimistic about their new coach. While Casey was there they consistently called for his firing. The posters criticize Casey for “dump and chase hockey” and are thrilled with their new coach’s “possession” style. They also still blame Casey for the losses this season, under the logic that the new coach inherited his players.

The “dump and chase” criticism is pretty funny. Casey certainly understands dump and chase hockey is not a high percentage play, and I’m sure his teams were doing it out of necessity rather than as a strategy. But the posters are under the impression dump and chase was Casey’s preferred style.

Casey had more success at Clarkson than any coach there since the '90s, when the landscape was VASTLY different. There are no shortage of delusional, ignorant fans on any team's message board/thread. Clarkson will be lucky to have a program in 5 years.

Perhaps, but they managed to hire away from the AHL a seemingly very good coach who is evidently recruiting well with his connections in Quebec/major juniors.

Because he's an alum. And Casey has a long history of being one of the top recruiters around. But really, I don't know why I'm engaging with you, since you will always twist everything imaginable to fit your gloom and doom narrartive. Someone take away my keyboard.

I don’t think my comment was particularly adversarial tbh.

Cornell at Clarkson is my second-favorite favorite RS game every year. I love the history and tradition of the ECAC and I hope it will outlive me. I mean FFS low bar.

adamw

BearLover

scoop85

Trotsky

adamw
Clarkson will be lucky to have a program in 5 years.

I assume because D-3 in other sports? I sure hope not. Denver, CC, NoDak and others in the same boat IINM.

Denver and NoDak are D1 across the board

But, very relevantly, mid-major in football and basketball, so their athletic departments don’t have excess revenue to throw around for “revenue sharing.”

They have the exact opposite issue to what you believe. Denver doesn't even have a football program - which is a positive. They may have less revenue, but it also means they don't need to throw $20 million in revenue sharing at it. Listen to my recent podcast with Denver AD Josh Berlo.

Denver will have just as much money as any Big Ten school to devote to paying hockey players. Michigan, for example, is capped at $22 million to spend. How much of that will go to hockey? More than likely, less than what Denver will spend.

I listened to the podcast. The fact Berlo wouldn’t even commit to opting into the settlement was telling. The fact is, their athletic department either breaks even or loses money, like every athletic department in the country outside of the power 4 football schools. They have no revenue to throw around. I agree Michigan probably won’t distribute much/any of the $22m to hockey, but Denver can’t either. Unless they have major influxes of revenue or cost-cutting measures on the way.

BearLover

adamw

BearLover

scoop85

Trotsky

adamw
Clarkson will be lucky to have a program in 5 years.

I assume because D-3 in other sports? I sure hope not. Denver, CC, NoDak and others in the same boat IINM.

Denver and NoDak are D1 across the board

But, very relevantly, mid-major in football and basketball, so their athletic departments don’t have excess revenue to throw around for “revenue sharing.”

They have the exact opposite issue to what you believe. Denver doesn't even have a football program - which is a positive. They may have less revenue, but it also means they don't need to throw $20 million in revenue sharing at it. Listen to my recent podcast with Denver AD Josh Berlo.

Denver will have just as much money as any Big Ten school to devote to paying hockey players. Michigan, for example, is capped at $22 million to spend. How much of that will go to hockey? More than likely, less than what Denver will spend.

I listened to the podcast. The fact Berlo wouldn’t even commit to opting into the settlement was telling. The fact is, their athletic department either breaks even or loses money, like every athletic department in the country outside of the power 4 football schools. They have no revenue to throw around. I agree Michigan probably won’t distribute much/any of the $22m to hockey, but Denver can’t either. Unless they have major influxes of revenue or cost-cutting measures on the way.

Here’s an article on this point: [duclarion.com]

BearLover

adamw

BearLover

scoop85

Trotsky

adamw
Clarkson will be lucky to have a program in 5 years.

I assume because D-3 in other sports? I sure hope not. Denver, CC, NoDak and others in the same boat IINM.

Denver and NoDak are D1 across the board

But, very relevantly, mid-major in football and basketball, so their athletic departments don’t have excess revenue to throw around for “revenue sharing.”

They have the exact opposite issue to what you believe. Denver doesn't even have a football program - which is a positive. They may have less revenue, but it also means they don't need to throw $20 million in revenue sharing at it. Listen to my recent podcast with Denver AD Josh Berlo.

Denver will have just as much money as any Big Ten school to devote to paying hockey players. Michigan, for example, is capped at $22 million to spend. How much of that will go to hockey? More than likely, less than what Denver will spend.

I listened to the podcast. The fact Berlo wouldn’t even commit to opting into the settlement was telling. The fact is, their athletic department either breaks even or loses money, like every athletic department in the country outside of the power 4 football schools. They have no revenue to throw around. I agree Michigan probably won’t distribute much/any of the $22m to hockey, but Denver can’t either. Unless they have major influxes of revenue or cost-cutting measures on the way.

You didn't listen closely I guess, because the reason for not committing to opting in, yet, is because of the potential roster cap, and general uncertainty, not because of lack of resources. Even if they don't opt-in, nothing prevents them from doling out revenue in some way -- which they will -- at least as much as Michigan does, which is all that matters. If you don't think they have revenue to "throw around," then, yet again, you know not of what you speak. Again, they'll have at least as much as the B10 schools have -- and again, that's all that matters in this context.

BearLover

BearLover

adamw

BearLover

scoop85

Trotsky

adamw
Clarkson will be lucky to have a program in 5 years.

I assume because D-3 in other sports? I sure hope not. Denver, CC, NoDak and others in the same boat IINM.

Denver and NoDak are D1 across the board

But, very relevantly, mid-major in football and basketball, so their athletic departments don’t have excess revenue to throw around for “revenue sharing.”

They have the exact opposite issue to what you believe. Denver doesn't even have a football program - which is a positive. They may have less revenue, but it also means they don't need to throw $20 million in revenue sharing at it. Listen to my recent podcast with Denver AD Josh Berlo.

Denver will have just as much money as any Big Ten school to devote to paying hockey players. Michigan, for example, is capped at $22 million to spend. How much of that will go to hockey? More than likely, less than what Denver will spend.

I listened to the podcast. The fact Berlo wouldn’t even commit to opting into the settlement was telling. The fact is, their athletic department either breaks even or loses money, like every athletic department in the country outside of the power 4 football schools. They have no revenue to throw around. I agree Michigan probably won’t distribute much/any of the $22m to hockey, but Denver can’t either. Unless they have major influxes of revenue or cost-cutting measures on the way.

Here’s an article on this point: [duclarion.com]

That article doesn't contradict anything I said in any way. I also go to most home Denver games - and I've seen the Clarion there maybe twice? I wouldn't suggest they have much insight into their hockey program.

adamw

BearLover

BearLover

adamw

BearLover

scoop85

Trotsky

adamw
Clarkson will be lucky to have a program in 5 years.

I assume because D-3 in other sports? I sure hope not. Denver, CC, NoDak and others in the same boat IINM.

Denver and NoDak are D1 across the board

But, very relevantly, mid-major in football and basketball, so their athletic departments don’t have excess revenue to throw around for “revenue sharing.”

They have the exact opposite issue to what you believe. Denver doesn't even have a football program - which is a positive. They may have less revenue, but it also means they don't need to throw $20 million in revenue sharing at it. Listen to my recent podcast with Denver AD Josh Berlo.

Denver will have just as much money as any Big Ten school to devote to paying hockey players. Michigan, for example, is capped at $22 million to spend. How much of that will go to hockey? More than likely, less than what Denver will spend.

I listened to the podcast. The fact Berlo wouldn’t even commit to opting into the settlement was telling. The fact is, their athletic department either breaks even or loses money, like every athletic department in the country outside of the power 4 football schools. They have no revenue to throw around. I agree Michigan probably won’t distribute much/any of the $22m to hockey, but Denver can’t either. Unless they have major influxes of revenue or cost-cutting measures on the way.

Here’s an article on this point: [duclarion.com]

That article doesn't contradict anything I said in any way. I also go to most home Denver games - and I've seen the Clarion there maybe twice? I wouldn't suggest they have much insight into their hockey program.

Well, the article says that were they to opt in (something their AD sounded very uncertain about), they’d have a budget of only $3m to spread among all of their athletes, including women (the DoE recently ruled male and female athletes would need to receive the same amount under revenue sharing) and their basketball team, which is competing within a world of NIL and trying to make the NCAA tournament and will demand much more money than the other sports.

BearLover

adamw

BearLover

BearLover

adamw

BearLover

scoop85

Trotsky

adamw
Clarkson will be lucky to have a program in 5 years.

I assume because D-3 in other sports? I sure hope not. Denver, CC, NoDak and others in the same boat IINM.

Denver and NoDak are D1 across the board

But, very relevantly, mid-major in football and basketball, so their athletic departments don’t have excess revenue to throw around for “revenue sharing.”

They have the exact opposite issue to what you believe. Denver doesn't even have a football program - which is a positive. They may have less revenue, but it also means they don't need to throw $20 million in revenue sharing at it. Listen to my recent podcast with Denver AD Josh Berlo.

Denver will have just as much money as any Big Ten school to devote to paying hockey players. Michigan, for example, is capped at $22 million to spend. How much of that will go to hockey? More than likely, less than what Denver will spend.

I listened to the podcast. The fact Berlo wouldn’t even commit to opting into the settlement was telling. The fact is, their athletic department either breaks even or loses money, like every athletic department in the country outside of the power 4 football schools. They have no revenue to throw around. I agree Michigan probably won’t distribute much/any of the $22m to hockey, but Denver can’t either. Unless they have major influxes of revenue or cost-cutting measures on the way.

Here’s an article on this point: [duclarion.com]

That article doesn't contradict anything I said in any way. I also go to most home Denver games - and I've seen the Clarion there maybe twice? I wouldn't suggest they have much insight into their hockey program.

Well, the article says that were they to opt in (something their AD sounded very uncertain about), they’d have a budget of only $3m to spread among all of their athletes, including women (the DoE recently ruled male and female athletes would need to receive the same amount under revenue sharing) and their basketball team, which is competing within a world of NIL and trying to make the NCAA tournament and will demand much more money than the other sports.

If Denver is required to give equal value to women's players, then everyone else they're competing with in hockey will be in the same boat. The bottom line remains, schools like North Dakota and Denver have nothing to worry about vis-a-vis "the big schools" when it comes to hockey. Clarkson is in a disastrous spot. Cornell remains to be seen -- though I am leaning on the side that Cornell will not be as negatively affected as some would think. They'll recruit the same players as always. The problem is moreso the consolidation of power elsewhere, making it harder to compete against the elite teams, moreso than Cornell backsliding - though the effect may look the same. It remains to be seen. All of college athletics is a mess right now - and it may be my cue to retire. Some may like that.

ESPN+ link not working for me. Sadness.

Edit: Fixed by going through the site search. Happiness.

Stanley???

Welcome back Hoyt Stanley.

Stanley 1-0

adamw

BearLover

adamw

BearLover

BearLover

adamw

BearLover

scoop85

Trotsky

adamw
Clarkson will be lucky to have a program in 5 years.

I assume because D-3 in other sports? I sure hope not. Denver, CC, NoDak and others in the same boat IINM.

Denver and NoDak are D1 across the board

But, very relevantly, mid-major in football and basketball, so their athletic departments don’t have excess revenue to throw around for “revenue sharing.”

They have the exact opposite issue to what you believe. Denver doesn't even have a football program - which is a positive. They may have less revenue, but it also means they don't need to throw $20 million in revenue sharing at it. Listen to my recent podcast with Denver AD Josh Berlo.

Denver will have just as much money as any Big Ten school to devote to paying hockey players. Michigan, for example, is capped at $22 million to spend. How much of that will go to hockey? More than likely, less than what Denver will spend.

I listened to the podcast. The fact Berlo wouldn’t even commit to opting into the settlement was telling. The fact is, their athletic department either breaks even or loses money, like every athletic department in the country outside of the power 4 football schools. They have no revenue to throw around. I agree Michigan probably won’t distribute much/any of the $22m to hockey, but Denver can’t either. Unless they have major influxes of revenue or cost-cutting measures on the way.

Here’s an article on this point: [duclarion.com]

That article doesn't contradict anything I said in any way. I also go to most home Denver games - and I've seen the Clarion there maybe twice? I wouldn't suggest they have much insight into their hockey program.

Well, the article says that were they to opt in (something their AD sounded very uncertain about), they’d have a budget of only $3m to spread among all of their athletes, including women (the DoE recently ruled male and female athletes would need to receive the same amount under revenue sharing) and their basketball team, which is competing within a world of NIL and trying to make the NCAA tournament and will demand much more money than the other sports.

If Denver is required to give equal value to women's players, then everyone else they're competing with in hockey will be in the same boat. The bottom line remains, schools like North Dakota and Denver have nothing to worry about vis-a-vis "the big schools" when it comes to hockey. Clarkson is in a disastrous spot. Cornell remains to be seen -- though I am leaning on the side that Cornell will not be as negatively affected as some would think. They'll recruit the same players as always. The problem is moreso the consolidation of power elsewhere, making it harder to compete against the elite teams, moreso than Cornell backsliding - though the effect may look the same. It remains to be seen. All of college athletics is a mess right now - and it may be my cue to retire. Some may like that.

I personally think revenue sharing doesn’t seem likely to be a big factor in hockey. Michigan won’t pay hockey players much because almost all the money will go to football, Denver/NoDak won’t because their schools don’t have much revenue to spend. Clarkson may be doomed, but for other reasons.

489-58 when Schafer's Big Red scores first. Hot damn.

Under Schafer, when Cornell scores first we are 489-56.

Jinx.

Trotsky
Cornell at Clarkson is my second-favorite favorite RS game every year. I love the history and tradition of the ECAC and I hope it will outlive me. I mean FFS low bar.

As a first-year Cornell fan, any paarticular reaso- AHHHHH TWO GOALS TWO TWO IS THAT KRAFT

We sure came out with hop.

Trotsky
Jinx.

Owe me a Coke

Cheel Fan favorite Jack O'Leary with an assist.

stereax

Trotsky
Jinx.

Owe me a Coke

That's unfortunate because you're getting a scotch.

Trotsky

stereax

Trotsky
Jinx.

Owe me a Coke

That's unfortunate because you're getting a scotch.

I'll take it! PK. DeSantis, everyone's favorite criminal on ice.

The record mentioned was 400-89-56. I think it was all time, too, and not just under Schafer

Anyone have the lines for tonight? The announcers just said 10 dmen dressed...

2-1, fuck.

If we ever have a POS PA like this you'll see me on the news.

stereax
Anyone have the lines for tonight? The announcers just said 10 dmen dressed...

[www.collegehockeynews.com]

Trotsky
If we ever have a POS PA like this you'll see me on the news.

Eh? What's so bad about him?

Trotsky

stereax
Anyone have the lines for tonight? The announcers just said 10 dmen dressed...

[www.collegehockeynews.com]

Where's Rayhill?

stereax

Trotsky
If we ever have a POS PA like this you'll see me on the news.

Eh? What's so bad about him?

Numbnuts gurgling professional style for a median IQ of 70. Fuck em.

stereax

Trotsky

stereax
Anyone have the lines for tonight? The announcers just said 10 dmen dressed...

[www.collegehockeynews.com]

Where's Rayhill?

I think they fucked up. He should be there. we have 10 D dressed.

Trotsky

stereax
Anyone have the lines for tonight? The announcers just said 10 dmen dressed...

[www.collegehockeynews.com]

The CHN lines are not correct (nor were they last night at SLU). I’d check the Cornell live stats.

stereax

Trotsky

stereax
Anyone have the lines for tonight? The announcers just said 10 dmen dressed...

[www.collegehockeynews.com]

Where's Rayhill?

He’s on the scoresheet the team posted but I can’t get it on here

Damn that was close.

Well, great movement anyway.

It’s not the lines but it is the accurate lineup: [cornellbigred.com]

Iceberg
The record mentioned was 400-89-56. I think it was all time, too, and not just under Schafer

Was going to say the same about 400-89-56. But they did say that was during Schafer's tenure.

Penalties will kill us

I hate to say shit like this but with Union winning this is essentially a must-win for a bye because the Knights are the only team we're going to catch for the 4.

Line chart

Trotsky

stereax

Trotsky
If we ever have a POS PA like this you'll see me on the news.

Eh? What's so bad about him?

Numbnuts gurgling professional style for a median IQ of 70. Fuck em.

LMAO fair. Was watching Union-Brown earlier and holy shit they said "the net came off its moorings" so often I'm convinced they don't actually have ice...

Faithful own this barn. Good work folks.

stereax

Trotsky

stereax

Trotsky
If we ever have a POS PA like this you'll see me on the news.

Eh? What's so bad about him?

Numbnuts gurgling professional style for a median IQ of 70. Fuck em.

LMAO fair. Was watching Union-Brown earlier and holy shit they said "the net came off its moorings" so often I'm convinced they don't actually have ice...

The nets at Brown are essentially just resting in a shallow divot in the ice. A fan could breathe and dislodge them.

stereax

Trotsky

stereax

Trotsky
If we ever have a POS PA like this you'll see me on the news.

Eh? What's so bad about him?

Numbnuts gurgling professional style for a median IQ of 70. Fuck em.

LMAO fair. Was watching Union-Brown earlier and holy shit they said "the net came off its moorings" so often I'm convinced they don't actually have ice...

I meant the public address announcer, not the game crew, who are fine.

RichH

stereax

Trotsky

stereax

Trotsky
If we ever have a POS PA like this you'll see me on the news.

Eh? What's so bad about him?

Numbnuts gurgling professional style for a median IQ of 70. Fuck em.

LMAO fair. Was watching Union-Brown earlier and holy shit they said "the net came off its moorings" so often I'm convinced they don't actually have ice...

The nets at Brown are essentially just resting in a shallow divot in the ice. A fan could breathe and dislodge them.

Flashback to Starr in the 90s. Although oddly it was only ever the Colgate net moorings.

5 minutes without a clear.

Trotsky
Faithful own this barn. Good work folks.

Like most ECAC barns tbh... that's a LOTTA red.

RichH

stereax

Trotsky

stereax

Trotsky
If we ever have a POS PA like this you'll see me on the news.

Eh? What's so bad about him?

Numbnuts gurgling professional style for a median IQ of 70. Fuck em.

LMAO fair. Was watching Union-Brown earlier and holy shit they said "the net came off its moorings" so often I'm convinced they don't actually have ice...

The nets at Brown are essentially just resting in a shallow divot in the ice. A fan could breathe and dislodge them.

LMAOOO that makes sense. They gave a Union kid a penalty for delay of game for pushing the net off its moorings, lol.

Castagna never does anything.

MACK GOAL, 3-1! And a likely Castagnassist. He heard y'all talking shit.

Trotsky
Castagna never does anything.

Never.

O'Leary with the Etienne Belzile Hat trick.

Trotsky
O'Leary with the Etienne Belzile Hat trick.

The what now?

It is odd how often the puck finds Jimmy Rayhill in scoring territory.

stereax

Trotsky
O'Leary with the Etienne Belzile Hat trick.

The what now?

3 assists

stereax

Trotsky
O'Leary with the Etienne Belzile Hat trick.

The what now?

I was thinking of our celebrated defenseman who never scored, but it wasn't Belzile.

Trotsky
It is odd how often the puck finds Jimmy Rayhill in scoring territory.

The missing piece...

The guy who the entire team tried to set up with an empty net in his final game, but he still didn't get one.

fastforward

stereax

Trotsky
O'Leary with the Etienne Belzile Hat trick.

The what now?

3 assists

The guy who got 10 assists over 4 years??

Trotsky
The guy who the entire team tried to set up with an empty net in his final game, but he still didn't get one.

Oh my god :')

How do you not pass at any point on a 2x0…

Oh hey time for a powerless play

Christian Felli.

2nd time they let it leave the zone

stereax

fastforward

stereax

Trotsky
O'Leary with the Etienne Belzile Hat trick.

The what now?

3 assists

The guy who got 10 assists over 4 years??

If you want a guy with a lot of assists...

Trotsky
Christian Felli.

LMAO. I see, thanks hahaha

BearLover
How do you not pass at any point on a 2x0…

The old give-n-keep

Trotsky

stereax

fastforward

stereax

Trotsky
O'Leary with the Etienne Belzile Hat trick.

The what now?

3 assists

The guy who got 10 assists over 4 years??

If you want a guy with a lot of assists...

Were the 60s and 70s Big Red just. scoring at will??

3-2. Same guy as last time. Sudovic?

No D in front of….grrrrr

Great. Just peachy.

Trotsky
The guy who the entire team tried to set up with an empty net in his final game, but he still didn't get one.

Christian Felli

Nm

I don't always have a frustrating season. But when I do, I do it while we watching democracy shat on by Clownazis.

stereax

Trotsky

stereax

fastforward

stereax

Trotsky
O'Leary with the Etienne Belzile Hat trick.

The what now?

3 assists

The guy who got 10 assists over 4 years??

If you want a guy with a lot of assists...

Were the 60s and 70s Big Red just. scoring at will??

Yes.

They were.

The following take is just plain wrong, but I'll say it anyway:

If you lose your stick, just go get another one. The team can survive without you for ten seconds.

Trotsky

stereax

Trotsky

stereax

fastforward

stereax

Trotsky
O'Leary with the Etienne Belzile Hat trick.

The what now?

3 assists

The guy who got 10 assists over 4 years??

If you want a guy with a lot of assists...

Were the 60s and 70s Big Red just. scoring at will??

Yes.

They were.

SEVEN GOALS PER GAME???

The Big Red needs to show a lot of character in the 3rd period. Forgot about the missing guys. Win this game.

Dafatone
The following take is just plain wrong, but I'll say it anyway:

If you lose your stick, just go get another one. The team can survive without you for ten seconds.

I've always felt this way but I don't know anything. it's only 5 second, because your replacement can jump the boards when you get close to the bench.

stereax

Trotsky

stereax

Trotsky

stereax

fastforward

stereax

Trotsky
O'Leary with the Etienne Belzile Hat trick.

The what now?

3 assists

The guy who got 10 assists over 4 years??

If you want a guy with a lot of assists...

Were the 60s and 70s Big Red just. scoring at will??

Yes.

They were.

SEVEN GOALS PER GAME???

Easy when you don't play defense.

Scersk '97

stereax

Trotsky

stereax

Trotsky

stereax

fastforward

stereax

Trotsky
O'Leary with the Etienne Belzile Hat trick.

The what now?

3 assists

The guy who got 10 assists over 4 years??

If you want a guy with a lot of assists...

Were the 60s and 70s Big Red just. scoring at will??

You forget that in that era, goalies were all 4'9" and weren't allowed to wear anything padded.

Yes.

They were.

SEVEN GOALS PER GAME???

Easy when you don't play defense.

stereax
SEVEN GOALS PER GAME???

Yup.

Scersk '97

stereax

Trotsky

stereax

Trotsky

stereax

fastforward

stereax

Trotsky
O'Leary with the Etienne Belzile Hat trick.

The what now?

3 assists

The guy who got 10 assists over 4 years??

If you want a guy with a lot of assists...

Were the 60s and 70s Big Red just. scoring at will??

Yes.

They were.

SEVEN GOALS PER GAME???

Easy when you don't play defense.

Christ almighty...