Playoff Tickets

Started by daredevilcu, March 02, 2008, 11:29:18 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

redhair34

[quote Rita]I think I maybe relying on Jason's radio calls.[/quote]

I hope that will be available.

upperdeck

the problem is that when a team does the games there are two entities trying to make money.. now you have  B2 and the ECAC trying to make money.. do they really think $8 for a dinky video feed is really about worth half the price of being there live?  its too bad the SUN doesnt do a little research into this and get the info out.. how many really watch. what is the real cost. and dont forget in the past if we paid for a road teams feed we could have bought the entire month for less than the $24 it will cost now for three games..   the should also offer a deal for the weekend package or at least let you watch other games as well as the local ones..

Rita

FWIW, I just wrote a letter to Jeremy Hartigan and Steve Hagwell (politely) expressing my displeasure with this contract. I did point out several of the things people had already mentioned:

1) A fan could end up paying as much as $64 to watch his/her team in the ECAC playoffs

2) In the past, opening and QF round video were available through the home team's internet package

3) No mention on whether the $8 fee also includes archive access to the game

4) No "discount" for the person who already has a subscription to his/her school's video service.

5) I also mentioned that I would have been willing to pay ~ $40 for a playoff package if it included access to all the ECAC playoff games both live and via an archive service. However, with  what B2 charging on a per game basis, I will not be subscribing.

It is probably too late to do anything about the agreement with B2 this year, but it might (?) give them something to think about next season. I realize that the ECAC needs to market the games and make them available to as wide an audience as possible, however, I feel that they "alienated" the loyal fans with this contract

According the ticket office release, the audio feed will be available on RedCast.

Jim Hyla

[quote redhair34][quote Jim Hyla][quote redhair34][quote David Harding]
Live Streaming Video
ECAC Hockey and B2 Networks have partnered up for exclusive coverage of live streaming video of all ECAC Hockey Tournament games. Each game will be available on a pay-per-view basis through B2 Networks at a cost of $8 per game. There is no full-tournament package available. Because B2 Networks has exclusive rights to the tournament, live streaming video will NOT be available through the Cornell RedCast system. Links to this weekend's games on B2 Networks will be available on Tuesday at www.CornellBigRed.com.
[/quote]

What a bunch of bullshit.  I want some money back from athletics.[/quote]

Give me a break. Playoff games are usually separate from the regular season. [/quote]

In the past (at least 3 years) quarterfinal games were ALWAYS included in the package. If they play 3 games this weekend--the cost to watch those games is more than half what it cost to watch an entire season of games.

But, gee Jim I guess if you say otherwise I should probably reconsider.[/quote]

Well, if you want to quote my whole post, you'll see that I also said if a national network gets the games, the local is shut out. That's standard policy; it has nothing to do with Cornell. It's the ECAC that determines the policy for their tourney, not CU.

Look at what happens for NCAA games; they make the rules not the school. SU has beer for sale at the Dome, but if it's an NCAA playoff and the NCAA doesn't want beer, guess what, there's no beer. You can scream at the school all you want, but they don't control it.

So, if you said you were going to yell to the ECAC, go ahead, it won't help, but go ahead. However, if you want to complain about CU, then you're barking up the wrong tree. They don't control it. Last year there was no b2, so I'm not surprised they showed it through CU. This year is just different. So yeah, maybe you should reconsider and scream to the ECAC.

Now, if this tournament is different than all others, and CU does have control, then I'm certainly willing to say I'm wrong. I doubt it, but it could be so.
"Cornell Fans Made the Timbers Tremble", Boston Globe, March/1970
Cornell lawyers stopped the candy throwing. Jan/2005

KeithK

[quote Jim Hyla]
So, if you said you were going to yell to the ECAC, go ahead, it won't help, but go ahead. However, if you want to complain about CU, then you're barking up the wrong tree. They don't control it. Last year there was no b2, so I'm not surprised they showed it through CU. This year is just different. So yeah, maybe you should reconsider and scream to the ECAC.

Now, if this tournament is different than all others, and CU does have control, then I'm certainly willing to say I'm wrong. I doubt it, but it could be so.[/quote]
Yes, the ECAC controls the tournament contract, not Cornell.  But in a 12 team conference individual schools have more influence than in the 300+ team NCAA Division One.  So if you can convince Cornell to support your position you've got a leg up on convincing the ECAC.  B2 probably does not have a long term contract, so changes may be possible (theoretically, at least).

I suspect the fundamental issue here is that there isn't that much money to made broadcasting college hockey games on the web.  The market is just too small.  In order to produce a somewhat professional product and make some money they need to charge what seems like a hefty fee.  Remember that bandwidth, and thus costs, increases with every viewer in a way that doesn't happen for TV or radio.

They're counting on some folks being dedicated enough that they will fork out the cash, even at half the price of a ticket per game.  As much as I love Cornell hockey, $8 per game is too much for me to justify so I will either listen to radio or follow on the forum.

Rita

[quote KeithK][quote Jim Hyla]
So, if you said you were going to yell to the ECAC, go ahead, it won't help, but go ahead. However, if you want to complain about CU, then you're barking up the wrong tree. They don't control it. Last year there was no b2, so I'm not surprised they showed it through CU. This year is just different. So yeah, maybe you should reconsider and scream to the ECAC.

Now, if this tournament is different than all others, and CU does have control, then I'm certainly willing to say I'm wrong. I doubt it, but it could be so.[/quote]
Yes, the ECAC controls the tournament contract, not Cornell.  But in a 12 team conference individual schools have more influence than in the 300+ team NCAA Division One.  So if you can convince Cornell to support your position you've got a leg up on convincing the ECAC.  B2 probably does not have a long term contract, so changes may be possible (theoretically, at least).

I suspect the fundamental issue here is that there isn't that much money to made broadcasting college hockey games on the web.  The market is just too small.  In order to produce a somewhat professional product and make some money they need to charge what seems like a hefty fee.  Remember that bandwidth, and thus costs, increases with every viewer in a way that doesn't happen for TV or radio.

They're counting on some folks being dedicated enough that they will fork out the cash, even at half the price of a ticket per game.  As much as I love Cornell hockey, $8 per game is too much for me to justify so I will either listen to radio or follow on the forum.[/quote]

I too know that playoffs are the ECAC's show, but I am disappointed that it appears like they didn't work with the member schools  to come up with a package that works with what their fans/schools already have in hand and doesn't make them (the fans) feel like they are being totally screwed and "unappreciated".

I have a hard time believing that there will be that many "new" subscribers buying games at $8 a pop, to make up for those of us who have decided that this is just too much (given how much I have already spent for Cornell hockey video).

Kristoph

Do student season ticket gamers need to buy new ticks for the forthcoming weekend of hockey against Green? Do the three extra provided suffice? Just making sure, sorry. What I am coming to approach is: What about the tourney playoffs in Albany, New York? How to obtain? How to get there (not directions, but autobus)? This scenario is long off though. Beat Union (Onion?) first! Cheers, and LGR!

Kristoph

sah67

[quote redhair34][quote Rita]I think I maybe relying on Jason's radio calls.[/quote]

I hope that will be available.[/quote]

[quote cornellbigred.com]
Live Audio
While Cornell RedCast will not have the streaming video of this weekend's games at Lynah Rink, fans can still hear Jason Weinstein's radio call of the action from WHCU 870 AM through their normal RedCast subscription options. Each game this weekend will be available through the system
[/quote]

cdpt08

http://www.unionathletics.com/News/mhockey/2008/3/2/MIH030208.asp?path=mhockey&tab=

Or you can buy your tickets and go to the Union games in Schenectady.  For students, all session passes are only $15.  Adults $25 for all session passes.  I called today and got tickets next to the Cornell section.  I recommend getting your tickets to Union early, as its a very small rink and will probably sell out.  Hopefully we can get a lot of Cornell fans there.

However, we have to get to that point first, something I'm banking on...

jkahn

The Redcast information page, http://cornellbigred.com/Sports/general/2007/Redcasts.asp?tab=multimedia says:
Quote"* All home sprint football, men's basketball, women's basketball, men's ice hockey, men's lacrosse, women's lacrosse and wrestling contests."
I think the reasonable expectation, based upon both interpretation of the above and past practice, is that playoff games are included.  So we're getting shafted here.
By the way, you can get the NCAA basketball tournament live, on-line, for free:http://elf.elynah.com/read.php?7,127052
Jeff Kahn '70 '72

BCrespi

Beat Dartmouth first, you mean.  We certainly can't think ahead to Union, much less Albany, even though we have played well against DC so far this year.
Brian Crespi '06

CM cWo 44

FWIW, bought 4 tix today. They had plenty in every section on the townie side. There were none available for the student side, which are part of the season package (as of today).

CowbellGuy

[quote polar]They now include playoff tickets on the undergrad sheets. Should still be able to find plenty, I expect[/quote]
Sunday's "crowd" wouldn't have even been a sellout before the renovations.

If everyone with season tickets does now, in fact, have playoff games included, that means there were at least 438 tickets available for every game this year after season tickets were accounted for. Not sure how many tickets are reserved for the visiting team, but I can't imagine it's more than 100. So there were, at a minimum, over 300 unsold season tickets again, and that's assuming the ticket office didn't sell a single ticket for Sunday's game.

Several student sections were more than half empty at the start of the game and I don't think it peaked at more than 2/3 capacity. I guess Athletics' mismanagement of men's hockey is finally taking a visible toll.

Having said that, I thought the crowd that did show up was fairly impressive, except for the constant "Thank You Seniors" at the end. Just cause you can't get your lazy ass to Schenectady doesn't mean their season is over.
"[Hugh] Jessiman turned out to be a huge specimen of something alright." --Puck Daddy

redhair34

[quote CowbellGuy]Just cause you can't get your lazy ass to Schenectady doesn't mean their season is over.[/quote]

Damn straight ::rock::

upperdeck

not that there have been that many game 3's but everyone I have seen has had a poor crowd. I understand us Townie's not showing on a sunday night, but where are the kids? one reason they went an all or nothing and make us by the season tickets early was to make the home crowd better. most people wont just throw the tickets away.  and of course the policy of no refund unless you ask for it.. nice CS by CU..