ECAC Predictions

[Ack]

Post Edited (02-12-04 23:39)

[dss28]

[Q]
But can you prove it by induction?
[/Q]

I never understood how or why we'd use induction for deductive logic.

[jeh25]

Mike Ack wrote:

Hayes...you're definitely not a facetimer, but maybe an outlier...

While you were in sitting, I was out lying.... oh wait. Nevermind.

(And just for the record, instead of doing my stats, I watched L&O on tivo.)

[jeh25]

dss28 wrote:

[Q]This pedantry was brought to you by the number n and the letter Q[/Q]

At least it wasn't brought to us by "n with property p."  I hated that little f*cker.

Actually, that was a pi, not an n.

You must be using some crippled substandard microsoft browser or something. :-P

[dss28]

Eh... bygones.  I'll reassert:

At least it was brought to us by '[symbol for pi that my browser doesn't support but turns it into an 'n']' and not "n with property p."  I hated that little f*cker.

Still works :-D



Post Edited (02-12-04 23:58)

[Jeff Hopkins \'82]

::help::

After reading all of this, it absolutely confirms my decision to become a chemical engineer.  I haven't used statistics, ever, and I've only used calculus once in 22 years.  Thank God!

JH

[Jeff Hopkins \'82]

Well, I assumed head to head was the first tie-breaker, but record versus the top four?!?

BTW, if there's a three way tie in points for third, who ARE the top four?  ::nut::

JH

[jtwcornell91]

Jeff Hopkins '82 wrote:

Well, I assumed head to head was the first tie-breaker, but record versus the top four?!?

BTW, if there's a three way tie in points for third, who ARE the top four?  ::nut::

The ECAC actually cleared all this up several years ago:

http://elf.elynah.com/read.php?f=1&i=33627&t=33626

[Jeff Hopkins \'82]

Actually it was a facetious question.  I was sure it was figured out.

JH