Clarkson Game Thread

Started by scoop85, December 04, 2021, 04:50:51 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

jtwcornell91

Quote from: osorojoUSCHO Hockey Guru wrote this headline: "Clarkson stages unreal rally to top Cornell . . ." "top"? New math? Clarkson graduate?

2 points > 1 point. :-(

billhoward

In 1969, Harvard rallied for 2 TDs, 2 2-point conversions in 2 minutes to end the Yale game at 29-all. Harvard Crimson headline: Harvard Beats Yale 29-29.


marty

Quote from: jtwcornell91
Quote from: marty
Quote from: Iceberg
Quote from: martyWas I seeing double before the penalty.  Looked like 4 Cornell players on the ice.

It becomes 4x4 after 2 minutes of OT

When you watch the replay the announcer said it was because the players called for roughing at the end of regulation came out at the end of their penalties to make it 4x4.

By that logic if there had been matching minors in regulation with the refs calling for the play to be 5x5 during the penalties then at the end of the penalty time they should come out and play 6x6.

This foolish 3x3 shit is a big turd on shaved ice.

I'm pretty sure the rule is that when a 4x3 power play ends in OT, the penalized player gets back on the ice, and they play 4x4 until the next whistle, when it goes back to 3x3.

Here is the clip showing 3 on 3 overtime play unexpectedly becoming 4 on 4 just before the penalty is called on Clarkson.
"When we came off, [Bitz] said, 'Thank God you scored that goal,'" Moulson said. "He would've killed me if I didn't."

jtwcornell91

Quote from: marty
Quote from: jtwcornell91
Quote from: marty
Quote from: Iceberg
Quote from: martyWas I seeing double before the penalty.  Looked like 4 Cornell players on the ice.

It becomes 4x4 after 2 minutes of OT

When you watch the replay the announcer said it was because the players called for roughing at the end of regulation came out at the end of their penalties to make it 4x4.

By that logic if there had been matching minors in regulation with the refs calling for the play to be 5x5 during the penalties then at the end of the penalty time they should come out and play 6x6.

This foolish 3x3 shit is a big turd on shaved ice.

I'm pretty sure the rule is that when a 4x3 power play ends in OT, the penalized player gets back on the ice, and they play 4x4 until the next whistle, when it goes back to 3x3.

Here is the clip showing 3 on 3 overtime play unexpectedly becoming 4 on 4 just before the penalty is called on Clarkson.

So I'm guessing what happened is that the matching minors that went on the clock at 19:56 of the third stayed on the clock, and then at 1:56 of the OT, they released so that the 3x3 became 4x4 until the next whistle (which happened to be for the minor on Clarkson).  I don't know what the rule says, but it seems like it would make more sense in that situation to take the penalties off the scoreboard and then release both skaters at the first whistle after their penalties ended.

marty

Quote from: jtwcornell91
Quote from: marty
Quote from: jtwcornell91
Quote from: marty
Quote from: Iceberg
Quote from: martyWas I seeing double before the penalty.  Looked like 4 Cornell players on the ice.

It becomes 4x4 after 2 minutes of OT

When you watch the replay the announcer said it was because the players called for roughing at the end of regulation came out at the end of their penalties to make it 4x4.

By that logic if there had been matching minors in regulation with the refs calling for the play to be 5x5 during the penalties then at the end of the penalty time they should come out and play 6x6.

This foolish 3x3 shit is a big turd on shaved ice.

I'm pretty sure the rule is that when a 4x3 power play ends in OT, the penalized player gets back on the ice, and they play 4x4 until the next whistle, when it goes back to 3x3.

Here is the clip showing 3 on 3 overtime play unexpectedly becoming 4 on 4 just before the penalty is called on Clarkson.

So I'm guessing what happened is that the matching minors that went on the clock at 19:56 of the third stayed on the clock, and then at 1:56 of the OT, they released so that the 3x3 became 4x4 until the next whistle (which happened to be for the minor on Clarkson).  I don't know what the rule says, but it seems like it would make more sense in that situation to take the penalties off the scoreboard and then release both skaters at the first whistle after their penalties ended.

I agree.  If the rules are as we now assume then four players in the box at the end of regulation would have resulted in a 5 on 5 as the penalties expired. But 6 players off for roughing at the end of the 3rd wouldn't have allowed a 6 on 6 when the penalties ended.
"When we came off, [Bitz] said, 'Thank God you scored that goal,'" Moulson said. "He would've killed me if I didn't."

jtwcornell91

Quote from: marty
Quote from: jtwcornell91
Quote from: marty
Quote from: jtwcornell91
Quote from: marty
Quote from: Iceberg
Quote from: martyWas I seeing double before the penalty.  Looked like 4 Cornell players on the ice.

It becomes 4x4 after 2 minutes of OT

When you watch the replay the announcer said it was because the players called for roughing at the end of regulation came out at the end of their penalties to make it 4x4.

By that logic if there had been matching minors in regulation with the refs calling for the play to be 5x5 during the penalties then at the end of the penalty time they should come out and play 6x6.

This foolish 3x3 shit is a big turd on shaved ice.

I'm pretty sure the rule is that when a 4x3 power play ends in OT, the penalized player gets back on the ice, and they play 4x4 until the next whistle, when it goes back to 3x3.

Here is the clip showing 3 on 3 overtime play unexpectedly becoming 4 on 4 just before the penalty is called on Clarkson.

So I'm guessing what happened is that the matching minors that went on the clock at 19:56 of the third stayed on the clock, and then at 1:56 of the OT, they released so that the 3x3 became 4x4 until the next whistle (which happened to be for the minor on Clarkson).  I don't know what the rule says, but it seems like it would make more sense in that situation to take the penalties off the scoreboard and then release both skaters at the first whistle after their penalties ended.

I agree.  If the rules are as we now assume then four players in the box at the end of regulation would have resulted in a 5 on 5 as the penalties expired. But 6 players off for roughing at the end of the 3rd wouldn't have allowed a 6 on 6 when the penalties ended.

Actually four penalties at one stoppage wouldn't make it 3x3 in regulation (which is what you'd need to get 5x5 when all the penalties had released).  You'd need matching minors, then a minor for one side, then a minor for another side, all within the last two minutes of regulation.

Actually, a 5x3 in either regulation or OT could result in 5x5 OT if both penalties ended without a whistle in between.