Harvard vs. BU

Started by We Want Weder!, March 28, 2003, 01:03:54 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

jtwcornell91

QuoteMarty'74 wrote:
Sound like the BU announcer doesn't know the difference between a misconduct and a disqualification.
Bob Norton has consistently been referring to it as a DQ.  I thought I heard them announce that over the PA as well, but I may be wrong.


marty

So they are right that Lannon is DQ'd but they are calling it a misconduct.  They still confused me.  The Harvard announcers just said that it might be a DQ ::screwy::  and the reason they gave is that it could be reversed which although true is a bit wackey to postulate.
"When we came off, [Bitz] said, 'Thank God you scored that goal,'" Moulson said. "He would've killed me if I didn't."

Tom Shen \'01 \'02


Baby_Fan


jd212

Neither does the Harvard announcer. He's gone for tomorrow's game, but they're calling it a misconduct

jbeaber1998

5-3 BU now, two quick goals....

Greg Berge

Complete collapse, 6-3.

Adam 04

6-4 dom with a pp goal



Post Edited (03-28-03 18:33)
This is your life and it's ending one minute at a time.

CU at Stanford

Scoring update, folks???

Section A

BU won it 6-4
Ferris St. leads NoDak 4-1 in the 3rd period.

schoaff