Time well spent when your team is idle

[marty]

Here's something to stir up the pot.  Weren't we looking for the rule book last year?  I found this when reading a USCHO post.

http://www.ncaa.org/library/rules/2003/ice_hockey_rules.pdf

[kingpin248]

Not related to the NCAA rulebook (and I'm not sure if this has already been posted), but the ECAC has reverted to top 4/top 8 for tiebreaker comparisons (instead of the previous top 5/top 10).

http://hockey.ecac.org/Page_for_Men/championship/2003_tiebreaking_procedures

[jtwcornell91]

I mentioned it, but I didn't have a reference to back it up.  Thanks.

BTW, there was actually an explanation put out by the ECAC a few years ago, explaining what you do if you need to use a top 8 tiebreaker to determine who's in the top 4 and a top 4 tiebreaker to determine who's in the top 8.

BTW, does the Page_for_Men in the ECAC URLs make anyone else think of Hair Club for Men, or Entertainment for Men, or similar silly things?

[Greg Berge]

"Page for men" reminds me of steamy nights in post-war Singapore, earning steerage fare for the slow boat back to San Francisco.  But that's another story.