Quinnipiac @ Cornell, Game 2 Postgame

Started by Jordan 04, March 10, 2007, 09:45:15 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Will

[quote Pete Godenschwager][quote Oat][quote sah67]I thought Mugford played a superb game tonight.  And yes, even when he led the charge that started the huge fight ;)[/quote]

Mugford sprinted in and pulled a swim move through 3 Q guys... as Davenport stood and watched quietly from the crease.[/quote]

You really want our starting goaltender, arguably the most important position in all of team sports, to risk a game DQ by getting into a fight?[/quote]

Maybe Oat is a Scrivens fan? :-P
Is next year here yet?

LynahFaithfulS

[quote Jim Hyla][quote LynahFaithfulS]On another penalty related note, what was Seminoff's 10 minute misconduct for???[/quote]

When he heard about his penalty, he slammed his stick against the boards right in  front of Feola. Automatic call.::doh::[/quote]

that wasn't smart on Seminoff's part...but that's worth TEN minutes?!

Dpperk29

[quote LynahFaithfulS][quote Jim Hyla][quote LynahFaithfulS]On another penalty related note, what was Seminoff's 10 minute misconduct for???[/quote]

When he heard about his penalty, he slammed his stick against the boards right in  front of Feola. Automatic call.::doh::[/quote]

that wasn't smart on Seminoff's part...but that's worth TEN minutes?![/quote]

the theory behind 10 minute misconducts is that it punishes the player... not the team.
"That damn bell at Clarkson." -Ken Dryden in reference to his hatred for the Clarkson Bell.

LynahFaithfulS

[quote Dpperk29][quote LynahFaithfulS][quote Jim Hyla][quote LynahFaithfulS]On another penalty related note, what was Seminoff's 10 minute misconduct for???[/quote]
When he heard about his penalty, he slammed his stick against the boards right in  front of Feola. Automatic call.::doh::[/quote]
that wasn't smart on Seminoff's part...but that's worth TEN minutes?![/quote]
the theory behind 10 minute misconducts is that it punishes the player... not the team.[/quote]
Oh. I see.  Thanks :)

upperdeck

that puck that was blown early was never covered.. it came out within a split second of hitting the goalie he never had any control. the only reason it didnt go in is that it was sliding so slowly. and the only reason he didnt see it was he never bothered to  move into postion to see the puck instead stayed above the goal line. he had that problem several times in being late getting back to watch the play, including the big penalty that decided the game..