So we'll get Michigan first round, correct?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: BearLoverIt's getting pretty tiring repeatedly going up against a far more talented Harvard team. Unless Cornell figures out a way to compete with Harvard in recruiting, Harvard beating Cornell and winning ECAC championships will continue to be the norm.
Looking at their roster, Harvard recruits heavily from Massachusetts prep schools. Cornell can't really compete with them there. Harvard also recruits a few players each year from the US National Team Development Program. Again, Cornell seems to be uncompetitive for these players. We have historically ended up with a few of these players, such as Bardreau, Bliss, Tschantz, and Fiegl, but these recruits were all basically depth guys on the Under 17/Under 18 teams and I don't think we've had a single recruit from the USNTDP since 2014.
It would be great if Cornell could shore up the above weaknesses by winning recruiting battles in upstate NY, and indeed we have gotten some good players from there and continue to (eg. Ryan Walsh, who is among the USHL scoring leaders and should be coming next year). But even still, a lot of those guys end up at schools like BU.
I'd be curious to know if the coaching staff has any sort of answer for Harvard's recruiting dominance. Our future recruiting looks good, but not Harvard levels of good. What's the plan?
Quote from: DafatoneOh, I thought it went from 0.0025 points if they were in 20th to none if they fell out of the top 20. Not such a huge game in that case.Quote from: chimpfoodA UConn loss here would be really bad as we might lose our quality win bonus.
It looks like the quality win bonus is a sliding scale based on the team's rank. So there isn't a cliff that you fall off of if a team goes from the bottom of the quality win bracket to out of it.