Quote from: Beeeej on March 16, 2026, 01:06:28 PMQuote from: Weder on March 16, 2026, 12:56:58 PMQuote from: The Rancor on March 16, 2026, 12:07:44 PMQuote from: ugarte on March 16, 2026, 11:53:20 AMQuote from: Trotsky on March 16, 2026, 11:09:52 AMDepends on motive. If they are innocently imitating, yes. If they are driven by profit, every fan could protest vociferously and the ROI would still demand they do it. MBAs cannot help themselves.This is didactic to the point of incoherence! Organic and sincere fan outrage is an indicator of where the profit lies! This is why you speak up! It's not like there is some payola involved that gets Cornell a fee to play certain songs during the break; if anything there's an expense to playing canned music. I am plenty anticapitalist but what's the point of doomsaying action?
I would not be at all surprised to learn that some Cornell donor profits in some way from the licence fee for playing the canned music during games. Such is the world.
Semi-tangent that I've always wondered -- is the pep band covered under some sort of university- or athletic-department-wide licensing agreement?
Pep bands and marching bands generally pay a licensing fee per song directly to the song's publisher in return for the right to rearrange it, and that includes performance rights. So there's no need for separate payment to, or inclusion in someone else's agreement with, an aggregator like ASCAP or BMI.
And for what it's worth, to my knowledge, neither the organization of composers that owns ASCAP nor the PE firm that owns BMI has a Cornell alum in a high-level position.
Would love to donate to the Pep Band to hear a cover of the Grateful Dead's 'Casey Jones' every game.
