Douglas Murray has not played for the Canadiens in the playoffs so far. Healthy scratch every game.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Josh '99Absolutely correct. The red/white scrimmage is what I was referring to. During a regular game the band plays when there's stop in the action and that is fine with me but at the red/white it is just over the top (for me) with the bands battling back and forth and seems way too loud. Now, GET OFF MY LAWN!Quote from: KeithKIf I'm reading kicksave's comments correctly, he's speaking in particular about the Red-White Game, which is sort of a special case because there's a White Band and a Red Band competing with each other (although everyone knows that the Red Band is sub-par) and both sound louder than normal because fewer bodies in Lynah means harsher echoes off concrete, and not so much about the virtues of the band in general. Though I could be wrong.Quote from: kicksaveNow here comes the rant which will be very unpopular on this forum but I'm gonna do it anyway. The band is too damn loud and obnoxious. Everytime there's a break in the action you can't even talk to your neighbor because the band is going all out. I realize they need their practice but it is just too much and when the crowd is sparse it just seems to echo and seems louder than normal. I truly don't go to a hockey game to listen to a band. I go to watch and talk about hockey. Sorry I'm just not a fan.Some of us think that the band adds to the atmosphere of a college hockey game. Yes I'm sure echoing is probably annoying but that's an attendance question, not a band problem. Here's the thing. Having the band play is a lot better than having Jock Jams blasted over the PA. If you want a quieter spot to talk hockey you probably need to find a time machine 'cuz arenas fill every available moment with sound these days. It's like it's a law or something.
Quote from: Jeff Hopkins '82I have a feeling you'd have a different opinion if it was your son getting sodomized. Joe Paterno was an extremely powerful man in that community. When he became aware of what was happening he should have put an end to it immediately and personally. Don't give me this chain of command crap. Joe Paterno COULD have and SHOULD have done more.Quote from: css228Quote from: ugarteOne act. An act that was a cover up of the rape of a minor that enabled the rape of many more. Fuck Joe Paterno and his memory. I don't care how much money Penn State was able to raise off of the sham that was the Paterno Way.Countless students got a world class education because of what he did for the university. I understand that he failed his duty and I'm not trying to excuse him of that, but many people are better off today because Paterno coached at Penn State. All the good he did does not cancel out his failings, but his failings do not cancel out the good either.
He didn't fail his duty. His supervisors failed THEIR duty. He reported the incident to his supervisors and THEY covered it up. And that includes the current governor of PA, who was the local DA at the time.
It's like this: you reprimand and discharge the soldiers that abused the prisoners at Abu Ghraib. But you ream out the generals who tried to cover it up. But you expect the lesser officiers in between to use the chain of command to fix the problem.
Quote from: BeeeejQuote from: imafrshmnQuote from: BeeeejI can't speak to Age's ultimate reasons for deactivating it, but I do know that it was being abused to target individual users.
This is such a lame reason if true. Facebook has a "Like" button but no "Dislike" because heaven forbid if people are "attacked" or get their feelings hurt online for posting something. Does ELynah really need to be this way? Do people really take their ratings personally or seriously? Golly. It's just an amusement. We might as well have automatic censoring of foul language.
I don't entirely disagree, but really... which is lamer: That a petty individual user might vent his disagreement with another individual user by scuttling the second user's rating with flames, or that we'd rather that not happen?
Nobody has to take their rating "seriously" for such a juvenile act to be obnoxious and unwarranted.