ELynah Forum

General Category => John Spencer Is Dead => Topic started by: Trotsky on April 11, 2006, 11:50:42 AM

Title: MLB RPI
Post by: Trotsky on April 11, 2006, 11:50:42 AM
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/stats/rpi

It would be a fairer way to choose the wildcard...  ::uhoh::
Title: Re: MLB RPI
Post by: Anne 85 on April 17, 2006, 08:31:58 PM
You're just saying that because the Mets are ranked second.
Title: Re: MLB RPI
Post by: Beeeej on April 18, 2006, 09:23:46 AM
The Mets wouldn't be ranked second if they weren't 10-2.

Beeeej
Title: Re: MLB RPI
Post by: jtwcornell91 on April 18, 2006, 11:29:03 AM
Bradley-Terry, anyone?

I know Ken has applied it to assorted European soccer leagues.
Title: Re: MLB RPI
Post by: DeltaOne81 on April 18, 2006, 11:55:34 AM
Ha, Mets 3rd. Yankees 3rd from last.

Yeah, yeah, I know, it won't last. That's why I gotta enjoy it while I can :-D
Title: Re: MLB RPI
Post by: Trotsky on April 25, 2006, 02:18:26 PM
[quote Anne 85]You're just saying that because the Mets are ranked second.[/quote]
Actually, when I posted it, the Mets were 3 games ahead in their division but ranked something like 12th because they had played nobody but Washington and Florida.
Title: Re: MLB RPI
Post by: RichH on April 25, 2006, 02:35:18 PM
[quote Trotsky][quote Anne 85]You're just saying that because the Mets are ranked second.[/quote]
Actually, when I posted it, the Mets were 3 games ahead in their division but ranked something like 12th because they had played nobody but Washington and Florida.[/quote]

You forgot Canisius.
Title: Re: MLB RPI
Post by: Beeeej on April 25, 2006, 05:51:22 PM
[quote RichH][quote Trotsky][quote Anne 85]You're just saying that because the Mets are ranked second.[/quote]
Actually, when I posted it, the Mets were 3 games ahead in their division but ranked something like 12th because they had played nobody but Washington and Florida.[/quote]

You forgot Canisius.[/quote]

You forgot Poland.

Beeeej
Title: Re: MLB RPI
Post by: KeithK on April 28, 2006, 06:20:30 PM
[quote Trotsky]http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/stats/rpi

It would be a fairer way to choose the wildcard...  ::uhoh::[/quote]Fairest way to choose the wild card?  Second place teams GO HOME!
Title: Re: MLB RPI
Post by: DeltaOne81 on April 28, 2006, 11:22:50 PM
[quote KeithK][quote Trotsky]http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/stats/rpi

It would be a fairer way to choose the wildcard...  ::uhoh::[/quote]Fairest way to choose the wild card?  Second place teams GO HOME![/quote]

Broken record, Keith... Keith, broken record

There, now you've been introduced, so you can know what not to act like :-P
Title: Re: MLB RPI
Post by: Trotsky on May 08, 2006, 02:38:59 PM
[quote KeithK][quote Trotsky]http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/stats/rpi

It would be a fairer way to choose the wildcard...  ::uhoh::[/quote]Fairest way to choose the wild card?  Second place teams GO HOME![/quote]

No argument from me, man.  I'm all for no divisions -- just two league champions play the WS as God and Barney Dreyfuss intended.

Conservativism in civil society; progressivism in politics -- the unbeatable combination.