ELynah Forum

General Category => Hockey => Topic started by: nyiballs on January 12, 2006, 11:30:51 AM

Title: [OT] Retiring Moose's #
Post by: nyiballs on January 12, 2006, 11:30:51 AM
As an Isles fan I had a deep hatred for Mark...  But to quote Vince Vaughn at the end of 'Anchorman,' "I hate you, but dammit do I respect you."

Messier's a class act, always has been.
Title: Re: [OT] Retiring Moose's #
Post by: Rosey on January 12, 2006, 11:35:59 AM
Not that I care all that much, but Age *did* go to the trouble of creating an offtopic forum just for this kind of stuff.

Kyle
Title: Re: [OT] Retiring Moose's #
Post by: Beeeej on January 12, 2006, 12:45:33 PM
I disagree that hockey, just because it's pro, is off-topic enough to be in a different forum.

But then reasonable people can disagree, and I suppose that's why the new poll is there.

Beeeej
Title: Re: [OT] Retiring Moose's #
Post by: Trotsky on January 12, 2006, 12:51:09 PM
An [OT] tag is fine for this.

Even as an Isles fan, I never hated Messier -- that Edmonton team was a pleasure to watch.  It was funny to hear him on Mike and the Mad Dog yesterday, gently letting down the hosts that his time with the Rangers was somehow the definitive experience of his career. ::rolleyes::    Nice gesture to retire his number, but he'll always be an Oiler and Gretz' teammate -- the rest is just a footnote.
Title: Re: [OT] Retiring Moose's #
Post by: KeithK on January 12, 2006, 01:15:12 PM
Agreed.  Hockey is appropriate enough to simply be [OT} flagged. Other Cornell sports probably are as well.  It's topics that have nothing to do with either "Cornell" or "hockey" that don't belong.  All IMNSHO.
Title: Re: [OT] Retiring Moose's #
Post by: ugarte on January 12, 2006, 01:26:51 PM
[quote KeithK]Agreed.  Hockey is appropriate enough to simply be [OT} flagged. Other Cornell sports probably are as well.  It's topics that have nothing to do with either "Cornell" or "hockey" that don't belong.  All IMNSHO.[/quote]That's how I would draw the line also.

My instinct was to think that "Moose" referred to Mike Mussina. I was less than shocked that Steinbrenner both had him killed and honored him. Then I stopped thinking.
Title: Re: [OT] Retiring Moose's #
Post by: Rosey on January 12, 2006, 02:21:28 PM
I consider myself slapped. ::laugh::

FWIW, I've been a huge fan of Messier's since I started watching the Rangers back in high school.  Didn't see him during his heyday with the Oilers, but I recall thinking he was pretty awesome nonetheless.  The point of this is simply to demonstrate that I'm an equal opportunity crank. :)

Cheers,
Kyle
Title: Re: [OT] Retiring Moose's #
Post by: Josh '99 on January 12, 2006, 11:16:25 PM
[quote Trotsky]An [OT] tag is fine for this.

Even as an Isles fan, I never hated Messier -- that Edmonton team was a pleasure to watch.  It was funny to hear him on Mike and the Mad Dog yesterday, gently letting down the hosts that his time with the Rangers was somehow the definitive experience of his career. ::rolleyes::    Nice gesture to retire his number, but he'll always be an Oiler and Gretz' teammate -- the rest is just a footnote.[/quote]I'm hardly one to disrespect the Great One, but for what it's worth, Messier won two Cups on teams without Gretzky; Gretzky won none on teams without Messier.
Title: Re: [OT] Retiring Moose's #
Post by: Josh '99 on January 13, 2006, 12:12:03 AM
For what it's worth, in the tribute video that aired before Messier's retirement ceremony, he refers to Rangers fans as the "Garden Faithful".  Shout out?  :-D
Title: Re: [OT] footnote?
Post by: RichS on January 13, 2006, 12:51:58 PM
His ten years in New York were hardly a "footnote" either in his hockey career or in his life.

He has talked about this many times, including during the Wed press conference and last night in the ceremonies.

Specifically for example, he said that his years in New York forever changed his life and those of his family members.  Sounds like a lot more than a footnote.

Hockey-wise, he has often said that coming to NY to try to win a Cup was his "greatest challenge" in his pro career.

It may not have "defined" him as a player but it certainly cemented his stature as a leader.  Again, far from a footnote.
Title: Re: [OT] footnote?
Post by: CowbellGuy on January 13, 2006, 01:25:20 PM
Everyone conveniently glosses over his defection to Vancouver. Maybe if NY had changed his life a wee bit more he wouldn't have chased a bit more cash elsewhere. I felt like they really went all-out for last night's ceremony. It was significantly more extravagant that what they did for Richter, who was not only the best goalie ever to play for NYR, but a carreer Blueshirt. I guess loyalty isn't that important to them. For the record, I feel the same way about Leetch.
Title: Re: [OT] footnote?
Post by: Josh '99 on January 13, 2006, 03:23:06 PM
[quote CowbellGuy]Everyone conveniently glosses over his defection to Vancouver. Maybe if NY had changed his life a wee bit more he wouldn't have chased a bit more cash elsewhere. I felt like they really went all-out for last night's ceremony. It was significantly more extravagant that what they did for Richter, who was not only the best goalie ever to play for NYR, but a carreer Blueshirt. I guess loyalty isn't that important to them. For the record, I feel the same way about Leetch.[/quote]You feel the same way about Leetch as you do about Richter?  Or about Messier?
Title: Re: [OT] footnote?
Post by: CowbellGuy on January 13, 2006, 03:53:42 PM
I feel the same way about Leetch as I do about Messier. Significantly tarnished their image with me by chasing $ elsewhere.
Title: Re: [OT] footnote?
Post by: Rich S on January 13, 2006, 07:44:20 PM
Not glossing over anything.

You're conveniently overlooking, perhaps, that Smith bungled the negotiations with the Messiers and didn't even return their calls while they were in Hilton Head, SC.

Smith admitted this later.

It wasn't that Mess chased the cash at all.  More like Vancouver chased him when they sensed there was a chance that Smith wasn't going to sign him.

As for Leetch, Sather TRADED him.  Leetch never wanted to leave.

I wonder if Sather willswallow his pride and pursue getting Leetch back this year.  The Bruins are going nowhere and Leetch can help their mediocre powerplay.